File under: dubious accomplishments 9

New York Times Magazine manages the somewhat astounding feat of conducting a thoroughly boring interview with Bill McDonough, one of the most interesting people on the planet.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Related Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement

  1. caniscandida Posted 4:00 am
    20 May 2007

    "boring"Well, the NYTimes Magazine is mostly pretty boring.  And Deborah Solomon is a remarkably annoying interviewer.
    But at least for those of us who are ill-educated and had never heard of Bill McDonough, the interview brought out a few bits of not at all boring information.

    Chickens are our cousins!

    So are other sensitive animals!

    Enough is enough!

    No more factory farms!

    Permalink

  2. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 4:10 am
    20 May 2007

    Bored By Victoria's?Well, the NYTimes Magazine is mostly pretty boring.
    The lingerie ads were pretty good...that and the crossword puzzle.
    The rest is a lot of gas.

    John Bailo, The "Denier Guy"


    You Read It Here First

    Permalink

  3. Steven T Posted 1:44 pm
    20 May 2007

    So goes the TimesBill seemed put off by the reporter's rather "basic" approach.  If so, I don't blame him.  In the old days one would expect more of a Times reporter.
    I'd agree with David that Bill is one of the more interesting people on the planet, but he does have similar limitations in his thinking as Amory Lovins, e.g., that sustainability is a "design" problem.
    Yes and no.  It is also a fundamentally political problem.  
    Consultants seem to be much more successful in the corporate world when they can present a schemata that clearly separates politics from design, but pushed too far this can be devil's bargain.

    Permalink

  4. GreenEngineer Posted 5:35 am
    21 May 2007

    For Canis...And for anyone else who is not familiar with McDonough's work and philosophy, this is sort of the definitive Bill McDonough presentation:
    </param></param></embed></object>
    It's from Bioneers in 2000, so the work references are a bit dated, but the presentation of his design philosophy is solid.

    Permalink

  5. GreenEngineer Posted 5:35 am
    21 May 2007

    GrrrFor some reason, the embedded Youtube isn't coming through.  Here's a link instead.

    Permalink

  6. GreenEngineer Posted 5:37 am
    21 May 2007

    Sustainability as a design problemIn response to Steven T: I don't think that McDonough believes that sustainability is purely a design problem.  He acknowledges at various points the need for regulation and government involvement, if only to provide the necessary incentives to good design.  But he focuses on design, because he's a designer, not a politician.

    Permalink

  7. David Roberts's avatar

    David Roberts Posted 5:46 am
    21 May 2007

    Here's the video:

    grist.org

    Permalink

  8. caniscandida Posted 6:47 am
    21 May 2007

    intelligence vs. stuffThanks, GreenEngineer.  That was a very well spent, very educational 45 minutes.
    One thing I learned is that the greatest male Celt who ever lived is neither James Joyce nor Tom Jones.
    How this guy became "dean," or whatever, of the University of Virginia, while planning sedition and revolution, is not easy to understand ...
    And by the way, on the subject of the Founding Fathers, did Benjamin Franklin really "speak Mohawk"?!
    Anyway, clearly BMcD is brilliant, and remarkably entertaining.  And I understand now DR's judgment of the NYTimes Mag's interview as "thoroughly boring."  Seeing BMcD doing his act just confirms my feeling about Deborah Solomon's nauseating narcissism.
    BMcD sure knows his way around PowerPoint, doesn't he.  And I love the cute graph with "stuff" on the horizontal axis and "intelligence" on the vertical, and the arrow looping back as it rises.
    But I am not sure I understand what he means by "spirit," and what he means by "relationships between spirit and matter."  Obviously, he has a great respect for Native American wisdom.  And his statement, early on, regarding our responsibility to "children of all species" is about as ethically enlightened as you can get.  I wish he had talked more about those things.

    Chickens are our cousins!

    So are other sensitive animals!

    Enough is enough!

    No more factory farms!

    Permalink

  9. GreenEngineer Posted 8:46 am
    21 May 2007

    spirit and matterTo me, the meaning of "respecting the relationship between spirit and matter" is a matter of acknowledging Einstein's dictum that "Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
    Spiritual matters are hard for designers to grapple with, and in our techno-reductionist perspective, we are often tempted to dismiss those things we we know on some level are important but cannot easily fit into our preferred framework for knowledge.  McDonough is saying, basically: Don't do that.

    Permalink

    10. Add a Comment

    You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.