... by feeding carbon sinks to our cars, trucks, and buses.
My wife pointed me to an article on biodiesel in the business section of the Seattle Times yesterday. I discussed this issue once before. But hey, if the Times can repeat the same story over and over, why can't I?
Let me parse this article out.
Plaza says Imperium's contract provides palm oil exclusively from sustainable farms, and it plans to perform audits to make sure that proviso is honored.
You can't possibly verify where a given gallon of palm oil came from, especially in a third world nation where graft and bribes are still standard operating procedure. What would you do if the person you send to Indonesia on a verification mission discovers that your competitors have hogged up all the palm oil from the "sustainable" plantations (whatever those are supposed to be) and that they are sending you oil from newer plantations (ones that more recently usurped rainforests)? Try to envision how effective this strategy will be.
"Quick! Shut down the refinery and lay everyone off! Recall that last shipment! We are using palm oil being grown on recently cleared rainforests!" Spare me. Had he said, "We will not be using oil imported from third world tropical countries because the incentive to destroy rainforest carbon sinks is just too great and there really is no effective way to verify sustainability," I would have been deeply impressed. You will also note that nowhere in this article was global warming mentioned.
Eric Bowen, an energy expert with Sigma Capital in San Francisco, said that among the 100 biodiesel business plans he's reviewed there are three types of companies: agribusiness giants like Archer Daniels Midland with lots of cash and talent; old hippies working on small projects that will mostly fail; and a new breed of "pure-play" venture-backed companies focused on making large volumes of biodiesel.
There's been talk of Eastern Washington farmers growing canola seeds as a local source of vegetable oil, but the idea has sputtered due to a lack of processing facilities.
Well, old hippies (70s-era environmentalists) and local production enthusiasts, it looks like the profit motive is going to roll over you, along with the planet's biodiversity.
Some people like biodiesel because it is renewable and pollutes less than regular diesel fuel. Others are intrigued by its potential to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.
I'm not the only one who can be repetitive. Now that low sulfur diesel is here, diesel vehicles will soon be as clean as gasoline ones. So at that point, you can scratch the cleaner-than-diesel argument. Also scratch the potential to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, for several reasons, the most comical being that this refinery plans to use foreign oil to make much of its fuel.
The renewable argument is mostly a matter of definition. Yes, you can grow more every year, usurping food crops, water, land, and rain forests while feeding the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico with fossil-fuel-derived fertilizers and pesticides ... but how can you call that sustainable (renewable)?
It's interesting that ethanol is taking the lion's share of critique from environmentalists when it is biodiesel that's exacerbating the razing of rainforests around the world. Even here in the U.S., it takes five times as much land for soy oil to produce the same amount of mileage as corn ethanol.
Nationally, there are several companies trying to prove biodiesel isn't just for altruists anymore. One competitor, Bioselect Fuels of Galveston, Texas, has oil-industry veterans in management, and investment capital from Chevron. It says it is pursuing a strategy similar to Imperium's, using large-scale refineries, cheap ocean transportation and diverse sources of vegetable oil.
New refineries are being announced almost on a weekly basis, bringing refinery capacity up to 1.4 billion gallons a year.
That's right, it sure isn't for altruists anymore. Lots of biodiesel refiners are planning to import cheap oil from tropical countries.
Imperium, he said, is in the third camp. Bowen said he's not sure the company has "a secret sauce" for success, but Chief Executive Martin Tobias, who took Seattle-based Loudeye public in the dot-com heyday, has to be taken seriously. "Whether these guys are riding a bubble of biodiesel or building a business for the long term is a fair and open question" ...
This biofuel craze is in no way analogous to the dot-com craze. In the latter case, entrepreneurs were testing the free market waters and most failed, as is the norm. Here, the government is guaranteeing profitability, and if the last thirty years of ethanol subsidies are any indicator, the government may continue to support the profit margins of investors for decades to come. This means accelerating loss of rainforest has nowhere to go but up.
Imperium does not receive direct subsidies for making it, but distributors get a $1 a gallon discount on the fuel's federal excise tax, a savings that can be passed to consumers.
The above attempt to deflect growing criticism is proof that ranting whiners like myself are making inroads. But seriously, how much biodiesel would they be selling to distributors if consumers had to pay an extra dollar a gallon?
Local governments like King County Metro and the city of Seattle are also among Imperium's best customers. Plaza says he's gotten a lot of support from elected officials and travels once a month to Washington, D.C., to lobby for their help.
This is called subsidization in sheep's clothing. Help with what ... profitability? Seeking profit in this manner does not sit well with me at all. Washington State's growing biodiesel industry is now dominated by its wealthy elite partnering with our politicians. Is it just me or is there is something wrong with this picture?
Comments
View as Flat
atreyger Posted 11:07 am
11 Dec 2006
However, I do not see a reason for why the majority of the population would care to pay the extra premium to pay for certified biofuels just like they do not care to pay for certified wood. It is much too expensive of a price to pay for exactly the same quality of a product. At least with organic foods, there is a perceived difference in the final products' chemical constitency, even if it is not visible.
If, and that is a big if, the demand was high enough, the as-of-yet non-existent certification would most likely require the refineries to use either only certified oil or stop the process if it is not or switch to mixing up runs of biofuel sourcing.
Permalink
Tom Philpott Posted 12:00 pm
11 Dec 2006
Victual Reality
Permalink
naturist Posted 12:03 pm
11 Dec 2006
There are, in fact, many, many crops far better to the purpose, all of which produce far more oil per acre, and many of which do not require the use of prime farmland or petro-chemical fertilizers for that matter.
Secondly, the author seems to take the tack that it is futile to seek to replace petroleum, so why even bother. The futility of such a world view is sad to behold. And totally unjustified.
But such pesimism leads me to ask why the author doesn't get up off his butt and contribute to the solution instead of merely complaining about why this is no solution.
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 4:34 pm
11 Dec 2006
Soy oil is a valuable commodity traded on the futures market as a food vegetable oil. Typically, the value of soy oil accounts for 38 to 40 percent of the soybean crush. But the energy boom has pushed the value of soy oil to 41 and 42 percent. Soy oil is a byproduct, which is not the same as a waste product. The price of the oil may rise with demand until supply catches up, making the soy meal the byproduct. Likewise, the price of soy meal may go down with an increase in supply unless an increase in demand can be developed in parallel. The bottom line: we will have to grow more soybeans to meet the demand for biodiesel. Where would those other users now go for their oil? If food producers have to turn to palm oil you have just pushed the problem from our shores to Orangutan habitat. If they have to buy it from South America, you are destroying the Amazon.
There are, in fact, many, many crops far better to the purpose, all of which produce far more oil per acre, and many of which do not require the use of prime farmland or petro-chemical fertilizers for that matter
This is true, but here in the U.S. we are making almost all of our biodiesel out of soybeans, and also importing palm oil. Maybe you should take your case to the refiners? I'm just the messenger.
Secondly, the author seems to take the tack that it is futile to seek to replace petroleum, so why even bother. The futility of such a world view is sad to behold. And totally unjustified.
I don't think it is futile to seek to replace petroleum. I just don't want to see it replaced with something worse. You agree that converting rainforest carbon sinks into palm oil plantations is worse? How about stuffing ten acres of soybean oil into your average American gas tank annually?
But such pessimism leads me to ask why the author doesn't get up off his butt and contribute to the solution instead of merely complaining about why this is no solution
Admittedly, there is a fine line sometimes between pessimism and realism. There is also a difference between complaining and critique. As for getting off my butt and contributing to the solution, well, I do what I can.
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Help acquire and protect ecological hotspots, give to a conservation organization: http://www.saveourbiodiversity.com
Permalink
benjamin2012 Posted 12:16 am
12 Dec 2006
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 3:48 am
12 Dec 2006
You did a better job of making my point than I did.
Benjamin,
All normal human beings have to be cool. What is cool depends on your peer group. Depending, coolness may be a penis gourd, lip disc, tatoo on your ass, shiny red Prius or Hummer. All human beings want to look good in their peer's eyes. That is why most of us comb our hair and wear clothes. By making envrionmentally sound choices cool, we can do great things.
Your pals have their hearts in the right place. They are cool if they are using soy made from waste. Most likely, they are supporting the soy lobby. They are also proabably unaware of the other downsides of soy biodiesel. Their beaters are polluting the air much worse than a gasoline car becasue today's diesel cars don't have pollution controls. That smell of combusted vegetable oil is soot heading for your lungs. They are also unaware that by using soy they have doubled their ecological footprints by usurping ten acres of soy oil to fill their tanks every year. Soy takes less fertilizer than corn, but uses five times more land area. If you are interested in other downsides to soy biodiesel, drop in here
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Help acquire and protect ecological hotspots, give to a conservation organization: http://www.saveourbiodiversity.com
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 3:59 am
12 Dec 2006
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Help acquire and protect ecological hotspots, give to a conservation organization: http://www.saveourbiodiversity.com
Permalink