Farmers markets 8

We're all fairly familiar with the environmental and economic benefits of farmers markets -- they prevent food from traveling long distances, they keep money in the regional economy, they encourage organic farming, they keep land in the hands of local farmers and out of the hands of sprawly developers, etc. etc.

But as I strolled around the Ballard farmers market today, I was most struck by the social benefits.

It's completely different from the typical retail experience in America. You're forced to think about what's in season, how to cook something tasty from the limited palette nature offers at a particular time. People mill about in the open air, in close proximity. Chatting and socializing occupy at least as much time as "shopping." Much of that socializing is with and among the people selling; the gulf between vendors and buyers shrinks. Sellers are personally connected to and invested in their products -- eager to explain the benefits, offer samples, and talk about the history of their wares.

A vendor selling meats came out from behind his booth and approached us to explain that the fat in grass-fed beef is omega-3, "which is good for developing brains!" he said, pointing to our kids. We asked him if it could prevent brain shrinkage in adults ... pointing to our kids. He laughed and said, "we can't promise miracles."

This all happened, mind you, after we'd already bought and paid for the beef.

He wasn't trying to sell us anything. He was proud of what he'd sold us.

Is anyone -- the workers in China who made it, the sullen teenage cashier who sold it, the corporate executives who profit from it -- proud of that cheap plastic geegaw you bought at Wal-Mart last week?

I've said it before, but it's worth repeating: Americans aren't materialists, not really. Yes, they "consume" lots of "products," but they do not appreciate material itself: the social and physical history of objects, the tactile, visceral reality of matter. To the American shopper, material is just a promise: of status, of convenience, of happiness. In itself it is a temporary totem, ephemeral and replaceable; indeed, the logic of the American economy depends on it being replaced, on it never being good enough.

No one is a "consumer" at a farmers market. Everyone, buyer and seller alike, is a human being. Every product is an expression of labor and love. Every transaction is a social bond formed.

Most Americans have simply never experienced anything like it. If more of them did, the environmentalist's job might be easier.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. mtuckr Posted 8:09 am
    30 Apr 2006

    the marketI agree entirely.  I fell in love with the farmer's market last year, and within that I have already devoted my last semester in college to study sustainable agriculture.  In addition, with my bachellor's degree in business I am going to work on a farm as my first job.  
    I really like your notion that we are not materialists.  That applies perfectly to the food sector.
  2. AE Posted 11:39 am
    30 Apr 2006

    YesFarmers' markets are great.  Last year, when I was buying broccoli, I could ask the farmer about his pesticides and he gave me a thorough explanation.  I could see that he was hesitant to tell me at first, but he did.  Since I don't buy organic broccoli because of the larvae that hide in them, it worked out for us both.
    Milwaukee now has lots of farmers' markets, including a large one in the inner city.  Some of the farmers are Hmong immigrants and seem to be doing well.  We could use more organic farmers, however, in spite of the fact that Wisconsin has the second highest number; perhaps they all go to Madison, which has a huge market, famous I believe.
  3. atreyger Posted 3:30 am
    01 May 2006

    organic at farmer's marketsI agree that it is unfortunate that there are not as many organic stands as one would hope. BUT, in reality many of the vendors tend to be more organic than not, simply because the cost of certification is high, and these vendors are low/medium volume producers.
    Organic certification is a two-headed beast: really good on one side, since there is adherence to a standard, but high-cost for the producer and thus effectively shuts out low-volume growers. The same thing applies to wood certification. One way to really find out about a grower's practice is to ask them, and you will find out that many use minimal herbicides and pesticides.
    There is a new label that is coming out, which might be as useful, and hopefully have certain standards to adhere to: 'Homegrown' or something like that. Have not heard much about it, but wouldliketo hear more.
  4. LibertyFarm Posted 4:15 am
    01 May 2006

    food labelHere is a new food label from Eliot Coleman.  I think he's onto something.
  5. John Fish Kurmann Posted 11:13 am
    01 May 2006

    "Consumers" is absolutely what they areDavid, I think you're definitely onto something when you point out that Americans are not "materialists" in any deep sense, though they buy an enormous abundance of material things. What they are is what the growthbound capitalist economy demands they be, which is superconsumers: People who consume huge quantities of stuff--use it up, throw it away--and spit out the waste, typically even leaving that for other people to deal with. They don't value most of the stuff they buy, and why should they? It's mostly mass-produced junk which took no real craft, no personal touch or skill, to make.
    I think it goes deeper, however. Many people don't value what's around them, the places they live, the stuff they buy, because they aren't truly valued in our society. This disposable culture treats people as disposable, too, to be put to work at a young age and kept there until they either die or become too old to be useful any longer. Employees are, indeed, "human resources," and they're treated very much like "natural resources." Not as bad, mind you, but not because the economic system is too kindly for that. No, the robber barons tried ruthless exploitation in the era of laissez faire capitalism and they found out there are limits to the abuse workers will put up with. Better to give 'em enough pay and benefits to keep 'em quiet than to have to put down workers' uprisings and anarchist insurrections every so often.
    People who aren't valued can hardly be expected to value others, and certainly not things.

    The world is sacred and I am sacred as part of it.
  6. mrosloff Posted 1:12 am
    02 May 2006

    farmers markets ARE awesomeBoston, where I live, has several farmers markets, a couple of them downtown during the summer and most of the suburbs also have their own farmers markets in some location or another in season.  Having produce that has not traveled from another state or country IS a good idea, and having farmers markets is also very healthy for the community.  If only they could be better publicized and even more sustainable...  I think that people are too likely to go to the big chain supermarkets for produce because they're there anyway and can get everything in one place.  
    In Boston we also have another huge produce market - not a true farmers market, since almost none of the stuff being sold is locally grown, but it's a venue for produce wholesalers who normally sell produce to restaurants and supermarkets to sell to the public on Fridays and Saturdays.  Still a much more interactive buying experience than going to the supermarket, it reduces waste (anything that can't be sold to restaurants goes to the public) and it's a fraction of the price (last week I bought a pineapple for $1 and 3 red peppers for $1).  And it's done with very little of the overhead of a supermarket either - it's outdoors under makeshift tents, without using massive quantities of wasted resources (electricity, water, etc...) that many supermarkets use.  
  7. kmp Posted 1:41 am
    02 May 2006

    HmmmmmDon't get me wrong, I am all for a good farmer's market, but it's funny to see praise of Haymarket (the weekend produce market in Boston) - while I was reading this post, I remembered my frequent complaints that other cities all had wonderful farmer's markets, where local artisans would sell honey, hand cut soap, candles, bread and baked goods, fresh flowers and herbs, artisinal cheeses, wine, beer and cider, specialty meats, and of course, fruits and vegetables.  Boston was stuck with Haymarket - a filthy, slimy back-alley stuffed to overflowing with rotting vegetables, foul-smelling fish, enchanted tourists and tiny Vietnamese women stuffing 30lb of cabbage (for $3) onto shopping carts. Ah, the memories.
    Perhpas it was because I lived in the North End for many years, and had to walk through this morass every weekend in order to gain access to Boston "proper;" perhaps it was because I had been to beautiful, pleasant, diverse and abundant farmer's markets in such unlikely locations as Reno, NV, San Antonio, TX and Ann Arbor, MI.  Surely Boston could do better.
    Perhaps Haymarket has cleaned up it's act in the years since I left the Hub.... but it seems so unlikely.  My recommendation is to walk the little underground path to the North End and instead go shopping in the many little markets you'll find tucked into side streets, away from the bustle of Hanover St.  Fresh meats, gorgeous vegetables, tomatoes to die for... coffee and herbs from Polcaris that I still buy every time I am town.. I haven't eaten so well (for so little money!) since.
    Kaela
  8. dreamcatcher Posted 12:41 pm
    02 May 2006

    Farmer's markets -- not with NAIDs, etc.If our govt. has its way, they will force the Animal ID legislation (NAIS) through to national law ASAP -- along with Premise ID and other inter-related laws to control & limit our choices to industrialized foods, seeds, plants, animals.  Go to some of the stop animal ID sites (e.g., http://nonais.org/index.php/about/) and see what's already in force in Texas for example.  If you like Farmer's Markets & the idea of buying local (what Eliot Coleman would re-name "authentic") -- then read up on these further planned losses to our rights we take for granted.  Soon we will have ID chips (Wal-Mart items already have them and you probably are wearing/carrying some items with them broadcasting info about you whenever you enter certain areas).  The animal chips will not stop disease (the basic premise for them) -- only give more control of us to the govt. -- & we get to pay for this loss of liberty.  The wide diversity of foods we value at farmer's markets will be no more -- much like loose heads of lettuce
    Most seeds/plants are being controlled by a few mega companies (e.g., Monsanto) and heritage seeds (which you can save & grow again) are being bought out -- much the way the early solar & wind companies were.
    Free seeds handed out in third world countries were genetically modified to produce sterile offspring in essence so the already struggling fmrmers who saved the resulting seeds had a U.S.-funded & backed  harvest of shame. The result was starvation & a high rate of suicide for the unfortunate recipients.
    We are about to be bar coded in the name of protection -- do you care enough to read up on it?

    dreamcatcher

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement