The National Wildlife Federation has done an in-depth assessment, Climate Action Toolbox, of Waxman-Markey’s American Clean Energy and Security Act.
Unlike other summaries, this analysis breaks ACES down from the perspective of the key federal policy elements needed to solve the climate crisis and build a clean energy future. It examines the legislation from the perspective of the new tools it gives us (and some tools that are still missing) for the work ahead to tackle climate change.
The “highlights” section is posted below, including this factoid: “The bill will save more than twice as much oil as we could get by opening up protected areas to offshore drilling.”
Highlights of NWF’s Toolbox Assessment of the American Clean Energy and Security Act
National Wildlife Federation (NWF) believes that passing the American Clean Energy and Security Act is one of the most important legislative efforts of our time. The legislation combines a clean energy plan, an energy efficiency plan, and a global warming plan that will create millions of new clean energy jobs, set America on a path of global warming action, and enhance America’s energy independence. NWF’s top priority for 2009 is to pass this important legislation while working to improve the legislation and defend it from efforts to weaken its impact. Here are some highlights of NWF’s Toolbox Assessment of ACES:
- ACES adds 33 important new tools to America’s toolbox for building a clean energy future and confronting global warming.
- ACES reduces global warming pollution significantly. ACES is a ‘fork in the road’ that puts the U.S. on a new pathway of reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. The pollution reductions in ACES by the year 2020 are equivalent to eliminating the pollution from 500 million cars—half the number of vehicles expected in the world in 2020 (see p. 8). ACES also establishes an important set of national scientific guidelines, scientific updates and policy reviews to steer and adjust U.S. efforts on global warming moving forward (p. 12).
- ACES creates jobs and invests in clean energy and efficiency, including $90 billion for state clean energy programs thru 2025 (p. 23). ACES’ energy saving provisions—which are only one part of the job creating potential of this legislation and a clean energy economy—will create approximately 250,000 jobs by 2020, rising to 650,000 jobs generated by 2030 (p. 15).
- ACES increases our energy security and reduces our dependency on oil. By 2020, ACES would save more than twice as much oil as we could get at peak production from opening up new areas of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) to drilling (p. 8). By 2030, ACES would save more oil than we currently get from drilling in all the Rocky Mountain States plus what we could get from opening the OCS.
- ACES saves America money that is currently spent on wasted energy. The energy efficiency provisions included in ACES, such as energy saving standards and building codes, could save approximately $750 per household by 2020 and $3,900 by 2030 (p. 15).
- ACES is fair to low-income and moderate-income families. ACES includes consumer energy bill protections for all families, and it has added provisions to fully protect low-income families through refundable tax credits and an energy rebate program, which the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates will add up to as much as $700 annually for some households (p. 25).
- ACES is a vital lifeline for America’s wildlife and natural resources. ACES provides funding for the most comprehensive program ever contemplated in legislation for protecting and restoring the natural resources that replenish America’s water supplies, provide fish and wildlife habitat, and support rural economies. Funding comes from polluter payments and is expected to average approximately $2.6 billion per year through 2030 - a small fraction of the economic benefits that natural resources provide (p. 24).
- ACES protects tropical rainforests by investing $40 billion of polluter payments thru 2019 into forest protection programs (p. 10, 24).
- 76% of ACES’ allowances from 2012-2030 are used for clean, green and fair climate solutions that serve the public interest (p. 21; also see pie chart). About 40% of allowances are auctioned federally or by states in 2012, growing to about 80% by 2030.
- ACES is affordable, costing households “less than a postage stamp a day,” according to analysis by the U.S. EPA (p. 9).
- ACES includes features to promote global progress. The bill includes important new funding for international commitments as well as incentives to encourage developing countries to reduce emissions (p. 19-20). This funding should be increased as the bill advances.
- ACES reduces the federal deficit by $24 billion through 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
- ACES is missing 4 tools that will be needed in the climate action toolbox. Importantly, the bill should preserve EPA’s ability under the Clean Air Act to require existing power plants, refineries and other sources to meet up-to-date carbon pollution standards (p. 11).
- ACES should also be strengthened by bolstering clean energy standards to create more clean energy jobs.
Related Posts:
Comments
View as Threaded
ngapsis Posted 12:56 pm
19 Jun 2009
and fair climate solutions that serve the public interest…About 40% of allowances are auctioned federally or by
states in 2012, growing to about 80% by 2030."uhh, what? if electric utilities and merchant coal get 35% of the allowances AND natural gas gets 9%, how can 76% been given to clean, green, fair climate solutions (35+9=44; 100-44=56%)? also, 4.1% of allowances are allocated for carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. CCS is a half-assed means of greewashing dirty, inefficient coal. go here, read who/what get the allowances for yourself:http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090515/allowanceallocation.pdf
Permalink
ngapsis Posted 1:33 pm
19 Jun 2009
renewable energy resource or other qualifying energy resource…" (http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2454/text?version=ih&nid=t0:ih:406).what exactly are the "other qualifying energy resources"? landfil gas, wastewater treatment gas, coal mine methane, and other qualified waste-to-energy resources. if you can use these, which already occur, for generating energy, awesome.but what are "other qualified waste to energy resources"? the bill defines it as "energy from the combustion of municipal solid waste or construction,
demolition, or disaster debris, or from the gasification or
pyrolization of such waste or debris and the combustion of the
resulting gas at the same facility…"(http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2454/text?version=ih&nid=t0:ih:313).so, burning trash is a renewable source of energy now? yeah, it's abundant, but burning it is definitely NOT helping to lower emissions. i may be knit picking parts out of this bill but this is obviously a concession to trash incineration. this bill still needs work .
Permalink
ShellyT Posted 5:18 pm
19 Jun 2009
passing the American Clean Energy and Security Act is one of the most
important legislative efforts of our time. The legislation
combines a clean energy plan, an energy efficiency plan, and a global
warming plan that will create millions of new clean energy jobs,"That paragraph is a big tip-off that reducing emissions to try to stop climate change is not the purpose of this bill. What we need is a bill that has reducing emissions as its main purpose. This all-encompassing approach just leads to everything being watered down. I think this bill should be opposed unless it is greatly strengthened in numerous ways and unless it will meet the goals set by science in reducing emissions. We are in a climate crisis and this is a much too lazy approach for a crisis."ACES reduces global warming pollution significantly. ACES is a
‘fork in the road’ that puts the U.S. on a new pathway of reducing U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions. The pollution reductions in ACES by the year 2020 are equivalent to eliminating the pollution from 500 million cars—half the number of vehicles expected in the world in 2020 (see p.
8)." Not according to what I have read! ACES probably won't reduce any emissions pollution until 2027 due to offsets and extra offsets and allowances. And what difference will some moderate pollution reductions by 2020 make if they are not enough to stop tipping points? After that, it's all over, folks. Steven Chu thinks we are headed for 550 ppm and if this bill doesn't address that seriously, and it doesn't, then it's not enough. This bill has become a joke.We need a tax on carbon ASAP and dividends to every American citizen from the big polluters. How is that complicated? We need a much more serious approach to this like closing down coal plants as soon as possible, a plan for that, not some ridiculous dreamy pursuit of CCS. CCS won't work. We need money for research and development for solar panels and batteries, not some carbon trading market.It's like politicians don't even know what climate change is, or don't care. Do they want civilization to survive, or not? I think members of Congress must have the keys to some self-sufficient biodome somewhere where they can survive climate change while the rest of us fry. Who doubts that? We're expendable! "Give 'em a nice little cap and trade bill so they think we're doing something .... "
If we take this bill to Copenhagen, the world is not going to be happy with us. We need to do a lot better than this. Congress, wake up! We're on to you!
Permalink