One might expect that ethanol plants would be unconditionally embraced in the farm belt, but farm families are not immune to NIMBY-ism. When plans for an ethanol distillery were announced for the outskirts of Sparta, Wis., residents concerned about emissions, odor, and, yes, the view, printed up T-shirts: "Good idea. Bad location." Residents of New Castle, Ind., are also lobbying against a proposed plant. "We're not against ethanol production whatsoever," says activist Lonnie Nation. "But if you put it where they want to, you're going to be squeezing all our homes between an ethanol plant and a prison. What will that do to home values?" Big Ethanol says opposition has been overstated.
Not Behind My Farm
Farm Belt residents not gung-ho about ethanol plants 1
-
Posted 2:53 PM on 13 Nov 2007
-
Posted in
-
Read More About
Related Stories
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success
‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
blueberrysushi Posted 2:23 am
14 Nov 2007
Another problem with NIMBY is that the politics of geography are complex, and NIMBYism implies that there is simply an aversion to having industrial/big ag/nuclear facilities near one's home. But people often oppose how they run or the very idea of them (as with nuclear waste facilities). In the latter case, people may only protest when the facilities will be located in their communities, but they may be opposed to them in principle, not just because of the impact to their view.
As for the ethanol facility, the "farm belt" is not composed of farmers. Even in the most ag-dependent counties in the U.S., farmers are going to make up a small proportion of the population. I'm not surprised people there would oppose this.
Permalink