Should the mush left over after the ethanol process -- known as distillers grains -- be fed to farm animals?
There's been little real debate around that question, even though a) heavy use of distillers grains as cow feed has been linked to deadly E. Coli 0157H7 outbreaks; and b), the mush has been shown to contain all manner of residues from the ethanol process, including industrial chemicals and antibiotics.
While questions surrounding distillers grains as animal feed hang around, the pet-food industry is seriously considering adding the stuff to cat and dog food; indeed, a few producers already are. According to a pet-food industry consultant:Currently, only a few of the "value brands" of petfood are brave enough to incorporate DDGS [a common type of distillers grains] in their formulas.
However ...
Considering consumers generally have a favorable view of "green" ethanol and petfood companies have a need to recapture some lost margin encountered with rising commodity prices, it may be time for the broader industry to explore its use.
In other words, hey guys, corn is expensive and distillers grains are relatively cheap. Hel-lo-o!
Will Africa’s farmland become a ‘resource curse’?
Top 25 reasons to give a damn about climate change
Global boiling declares war on Thanksgiving
Comments
View as Threaded
Orfintain Posted 10:00 am
06 Oct 2008
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 12:18 pm
06 Oct 2008
All kinds of drugs are being prescribed for this at great cost, while the problem remains the additives in the food that dogs don't naturally eat.
With ethanol waste added to food, pet health will suffer and healthcare costs will soar.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
turanga leela Posted 5:36 am
07 Oct 2008
Permalink