Grist Election Central 2008

The outcomes of environmentally notable races and ballot measures 3

Senate | House | Governors | Ballot Initiatives

California Prop. 1A
Would partially fund a high-speed train linking Southern California with the Bay Area and the Sacramento/San Joaquin Valley.

Yes
No
Backgrounder
Video about 1A

-----------------------------------------------------------------

California Prop. 2
Would prohibit the confinement of livestock in a manner that does not allow them to turn around freely, stand up, lie down, or extend their wings and limbs.

Yes
No
Article
Backgrounder
Update: Farm industry upset over passage

-----------------------------------------------------------------

California Prop. 7
Would require utilities to generate 20 percent of their power from renewable energy sources by 2010, 40 percent by 2020, and 50 percent by 2025.

Yes
No
Backgrounder
Anti-7 op-ed
Pro-7 op-ed

-----------------------------------------------------------------

California Prop. 10
Would authorize $5 billion in bonds to be dispersed as cash payments to purchasers of certain high-fuel-economy and alternative-fuel vehicles, or to be invested in renewable energy R&D, production, and education.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

San Francisco Prop. H
Would require 51 percent of the city's electricity be sourced from "renewable sources" by 2017, 75 percent by 2030, and 100 percent -- or all that is "technologically feasible or practicable" -- by 2040.

Yes
No
Backgrounder
More background & a pro-H video

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Colorado Amendment 58
Would raise taxes on oil and gas companies operating in Colorado and allocate the revenues to college scholarships, wildlife conservation, renewable energy, energy-impacted areas, and water treatment.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Colorado Amendment 52
A counter-initiative to Amendment 58, it would maintain the present tax structure and redirect a majority of the funds presently going to the Department of Natural Resources -- for mineral extraction, clean energy, and low-income energy assistance programs -- to a new transportation trust fund to ease congestion on the I-70 corridor. If both ballot measures pass, Amendment 52 would supersede 58, as 52 is a constitutional amendment while 58 is a statutory change.

Yes
No

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Florida Amendment 4
Would institute a property-tax exemption for property placed under permanent conservation protection.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Minnesota Clean Water, Wildlife, Cultural Heritage, and Natural Areas amendment
Would raise the state sales tax by three-eighths of 1 percent in order to increase state funding for natural resource protection and cultural heritage programs.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Missouri Prop. C
Would require 15 percent of the state's electricity come from clean energy sources by 2021, and would require that utilities raise consumer rates no more than 1 percent per year to pay for the renewable energy.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Ohio Issue 2
Would authorize the state to borrow $400 million for environmental conservation.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Ohio Issue 3
Would create a constitutional amendment to protect property rights and rights to the reasonable use of water.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Washington Prop. 1
Would provide $18 billion to support mass-transit services and expand light rail into several communities south of Seattle.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Washington I-985
Would open high-occupancy vehicle lanes to all traffic during specified hours, require traffic light synchronization, increase roadside assistance funding, and dedicate certain taxes, fines, tolls, and other revenues to traffic-flow purposes.

Yes
No
Backgrounder

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Senate | House | Governors | Ballot Initiatives

Previous 1 2 3 4

Advertisement
Advertisement

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement