Edible media: Daring to grow a real peach

David Mas Masumoto breaks down the joy and pain of farming. 2

This post marks the launch of "Edible Media," an occasional look at interesting or deplorable food journalism on the web.

Food coverage in The New York Times Sunday Magazine has been in a funk for a while now. Aside from the odd trenchant bit of commentary from Michael Pollan, the magazine's weekly food section has been slight and generally forgettable.

This past Sunday, though, the magazine ran a terrific piece on farming by David Mas Masumoto, a California fruit farmer and writer.

Ever wandered into a farmers market and seen a bleary-eyed farmer sitting behind mounds of gorgeous produce, and wondered why the hell he's charging so much? Read this piece.

Regarding a field full of ripe fruit but on the verge of a weed explosion, Masumoto conjures the most vivid description of weeds from a farmer's perspective I've ever read:

Innocent-looking for a day or two, [the weeds] kept growing, spreading thick over the landscape. Soon a tangled mass of fibers would compete for water, nutrients and sunlight, stunting the development of my crops, robbing fruits of the essentials they need to grow fat.

For Masumoto, a weed-riddled field means more than just potential financial hardship (though that threat is real and difficult enough). He's worried about compromising flavor.

There may still be farmers out there in it for the cash (though even owners of the biggest corn or cotton farms would probably do better cashing out and buying a fast-food franchise). Others do it to honor family tradition, others out of love for working the earth.

Masumoto's essay is a lucid, concentrated expression of a different style of farmer -- the kind obsessed with flavor. In an age of assembly-line peaches that never ripen properly and taste like a Kool-Aid simulacrum of peachiness, Masumoto lays down body and soul to create real fruit. He writes:

Organic farming challenged us: without chemicals, we had to weed by hand and adapt our equipment; constant monitoring was essential to get rid of worms and insects before they took over; plant diseases demanded experimenting with simple but unreliable treatments. It all took vast amounts of time, to anticipate weather, react quickly and respond to nature. The rewards, though, were wonderful: we worked to save heirloom peaches and nectarines with nectar that exploded on the palate, as well as grapes that made sweet, plump raisins.

The rewards, though, were wonderful. This is a remarkable statement. In a sedentary age, Masumoto has forsaken his right to a cubicle job and a house in the suburbs and chosen instead to do back-breaking work literally from dawn to dusk. The reward isn't financial; it's access to the fruit.

The essay's hook is Masumoto's 76-year-old father, who farmed the same land before him and literally has a stroke in the field after Masumoto has asked the old man to help him weed. I love how, in a potentially maudlin passage about the father's stroke, Masumoto reverts to his obsession: flavor.

I felt responsible. In my quest to grow the perfect peach and the sweetest raisin, had I contributed to the possible death of my father? I inherited his passion for work, one that was being rewarded by the growing organic marketplace and the public demand for real taste. The only way I knew how to meet that expectation was to work harder. The flavors that I sought for my fruit could never be manufactured. Such authentic flavors come only from nature -- and authentic work. But even if it kills you? I thought of the spirit of the artist who sacrifices everything for the sake of his work. Couldn't farmers be artists, too?

That's good stuff. Elizabeth David, one of the 20th century's greatest food writers, once declared that "cooking well is trouble." So is farming well. Few bother to do either these days.

But eat a real peach, or a ripe heirloom tomato, or make a proper omelet with well-raised butter and eggs, and all that back-breaking work is redeemed. Our society needs more Masumotos, and should figure out a way to make small-scale organic farming a more viable enterprise.

Grist food editor Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. Follow my Twitter feed; contact me at tphilpott[at]grist[dot]org.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. DianaJardine Posted 4:40 am
    15 Aug 2006

    There could be a wayand that way has been talked about a few times here on gristmill. Many people see agricultural subsidies as a great evil, as a market distortion or as something destructive. But this need not be the case.
    I don't pretend to know exactly how to do it, but subsidies could be reformulated so they make sense, so they help small farmers, so they encourage the production of good, local food. These are things that we care about as a society, things that should be more important than a free market or an "efficient" economy.

    Diana
  2. caniscandida Posted 5:30 am
    15 Aug 2006

    figuring out a wayYes, Tom, I had seen this essay and found it very moving.  I am glad you have thought well of it too, and recommended it so highly.
    I think I most appreciated the irony that this immigrant family, in spite of all the abuse and injustice that they suffered at the hands of Americans, especially in the first half of the 20th century, still returned to their dream, and resolutely made a profound personal investment in our land and culture.  And that decision seems to have been made primarily by the author's heroic father.
    I wish Masumoto would write more about the nature of his commitment to organic farming.  There is no quarrel whatsoever, of course, with his suggestion that "farmers can be artists."  To look at that, and all it might involve, from another perspective, organic farmers and their friends might want to read two of the greatest long poems ever written, about farming in the ancient Mediterranean: Hesiod's "Works and Days," by a real farmer in Archaic Greece (8th-7th centuries BCE); and, one of the most beautiful things ever written in Latin, Vergil's "Georgics," dedicated to Octavian, the future Augustus, the restorer of peace and of Italian prosperity, and which was read to him on his return (in 29 BCE) from his decisive defeat of Antony and Cleopatra.
    In the Connecticut Public Radio interview with Michael Pollan that I referred to last week in another thread, Pollan made this fascinating comment about organic farming: For decades now, university agriculture departments have invested lots of time, money and labor into researching how to improve the production of the big crops, especially corn, as huge, chemistry-reliant monocultures, perfectly suitable to the business model of Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill.  On the other hand, little or no university-based research has gone into developing easier, more practical ways of doing organic agriculture.  If more attention should ever become directed toward research in organic agriculture, and more resources become available, Pollan seems to hope that a good and revolutionary new age might before long be upon us.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement