Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, regularly has me on his Earthbeat radio show, so I'm returning the favor with this great letter to the editor he had in the Washington Post yesterday:
Fact: Virginia gets less than 1 percent of its electricity from "green" sources such as the wind or the sun. Fact: Virginia ranks 38th among U.S. states in energy efficiency. Fact: Climate change is real, and fossil fuel substitutes are needed, according to President Bush's State of the Union address last year. So how would Dominion Virginia Power respond to these facts?Whew! Talk about getting everything wrong.
- Savagely blow up entire mountains in southwest Virginia.
- Feed the resulting exposed coal to a proposed power plant that is unnecessary and would cost ratepayers at least $1.8 billion.
- Create lots more greenhouse gases in the process.
- Doom the good people of southwest Virginia to living with a brutal extraction industry that has no future.
And yet Gov. Tim Kaine supports the plan:
Astonishingly, Gov. Tim Kaine supports Dominion Virginia Power's controversial 585-megawatt coal plant proposed for Wise County. He supports this despite three more facts. First, a senior aide of the governor recently admitted that there's "less than 10 years' worth of commercially viable coal left in Virginia." Second, more than 200 Virginians packed a hearing room this month in Richmond to denounce the proposal being considered by the Virginia State Corporation Commission. Third, Kaine's energy plan includes passages explicitly discouraging the development of "conventional" power (i.e., fossil fuels) until the state has maximized efficiency and clean-energy development.
Maximized?
Virginia has one of the most bloated, inefficient electricity loads in America. Per capita use is roughly twice as high as it is in California and New York. Just phasing out inefficient light bulbs, as Congress has mandated beginning in 2012, would eliminate electricity consumption in Virginia equal to half the entire output of the Wise County plant. And using money-saving "smart grid" systems -- a technology that painlessly shuts off air conditioners for brief moments and invisibly manages other electricity use in homes -- could save the electricity equivalent of two Wise County plants. So why are we building this facility?
Thankfully, there's still time for Kaine and the legislature to kill this disastrous power plant idea and create, instead, a real and lasting energy prosperity for southwest Virginia and the rest of the state. Beyond efficiency, federal estimates show Virginia could get 12 percent of its electricity from wind farms using just a small area of land. Yet Dominion's wind-power investments equal less than 0.5 percent of its total mid-Atlantic generation capacity. And the best the state government has done on efficiency is offer a four-day tax holiday to Virginians who buy efficient bulbs and appliances.
The Clean Energy Future Act, a bill now before the Virginia General Assembly, would correct these glaring deficiencies. It would follow the lead of dozens of other states in setting robust but realistic statutory targets in clean power, efficiency and "green jobs."
Twenty five percent of the land area in beautiful Wise County, in the heart of Appalachia, has been destroyed by mountaintop removal and other mining in the past four decades. Let's save the mountains still standing and embrace durable, sustainable industries there such as cultural tourism, outdoor recreation and wind farms. Let's simultaneously retrain and support the coal miners who'd rather build solar panels and windmills anyway, if only they had a governor and legislature willing to stand up to Dominion and finally say stop!
Lots of other traditionally conservative states are saying no to new coal. It's time Virginia did, too.
This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
Another coal plant bites the dust
Blowing up our clean energy future
Comments
View as Flat
JohnMashey Posted 6:45 am
28 Jan 2008
I did a spreadsheet with:
Paid
Received
Difference = paid - Received
% Return = Received/Paid
and sorted by Difference, with a few interesting states:
CA -$63B, 75% [largest net contributor]
NY -$47B, 72% [2nd largest]
....
MD +$5B, 112%
....
VA +$13B, 126% [largest net recipient]
==
Also interesting is that of the 15 states that made net contributions [CA, NY, IL*, NJ, MI*, CT, MA, MN*, WA, WI*, PA, OR, NH*, DE*, VT}, 9 are with CA in fighting the EPA (* aren't), along with RI, ME, MD, FL, CO, UT, AZ, NM, i.e., 17 states total.
If your take those 17, of the money sent to the Federal Govt that didn't come back $290B), we paid 70%, despite being 46% of the population.
There seems to be a strong correlation between states that worry about energy&climate, and those who don't. It may well be that being well-subsidized by the rest of us helps a state ignore such issues...
-John Mashey
Permalink
TheGreenMiles Posted 7:09 am
28 Jan 2008
Join the discussion on global warming, recycling, and organic beer at The Green Miles!
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 7:18 am
28 Jan 2008
http://greyfalcon.net/costlycoal2
http://greyfalcon.net/ccs
Permalink
JMG Posted 8:43 am
28 Jan 2008
Save the world: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 5% annually.
Permalink
Delay And Deny Posted 9:45 am
28 Jan 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602099&sid=a ...
Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Coal rose to a record in Asia and advanced in Europe as floods in Australia and snow storms in China restricted output, spurring utilities to seek new supplies.
Anglo American Plc today said operations have resumed at five South African mines shut Jan. 25 because of power shortages. Coal prices at Australia's Newcastle port, a benchmark for Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, jumped 3.9 percent to a record $93.35 a metric ton in the week ended Jan. 25, according to globalCOAL. European coal advanced to a two-week high.
``It's difficult to see in the next 18 months to two years who would have the capacity to significantly increase supply,'' Graham Chapman, managing director at Richmond, U.K.-based consultant Energy Edge Ltd., said by telephone today.
Viva la Climate Resistance!
Permalink
Martha Hagood Posted 11:40 am
28 Jan 2008
Permalink
catman Posted 12:14 pm
28 Jun 2008
Permalink