Craig Venter and his microbes

If you know what we mean 2

There's an interesting story in The Atlantic about Craig Venter, the guy who successfully sequenced the human genome (using private capital). Now he's working on engineering microbes designed specifically to convert biomass directly into ethanol. He also has grander, longer-term plans to have them produce other kinds of fuels like natural gas from sewage sludge and hydrogen from sunlight.

I thought this was interesting:

... Venter believes the government needs to make a steady commitment to alternative energy. But not with props like the 51-cents-a-gallon ethanol subsidy. The government should be funding research rather than actual products, he argues, so as not to create "a false industry that collapses once the subsidies collapse." And not with the sort of large-scale, Manhattan Project-style effort that many pundits have called for. If you put everyone into a laboratory in New Mexico or Nevada and tell them to come up with a solution, Venter says, it will just be the Human Genome Project all over again: a slow-motion process waiting for the kind of private-sector kick in the pants that he provided. Instead, Venter wants to see the government fund a variety of competing companies and research projects. "I'd rather see a thousand points of light than one dull bureaucracy," he says. "We don't have to have a single industrial-complex solution to this problem."

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 11:03 am
    16 Jan 2007

    You found a gem there, DaveHe is walking proof of the concept. Now to convince the power brokers to shake off the profit takers.

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  2. froggy Posted 11:28 am
    16 Jan 2007

    a second part...there should be a second part to that paragraph...the part about the gov to not pay for green energy in subsidies but tax the black energy how they should be taxed. and that tax $$$ goes (in part) to research. green energy doesnt need a handout that makes them dependent, green energy needs a level playing field based on complete accounting.



    froggy

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement