Congested roads, free-flowing people

Commuters in Seattle avoid congested roads by driving less 5

Apparently, folks in Greater Seattle are responding to congestion by ... driving less! Which is, quite literally, no surprise at all. A comprehensive study of transportation patterns in cities across the globe found that high levels of congestion are linked with low overall energy consumption. When roads get congested, people adjust, and find alternatives to long, time-consuming commutes.

And that's what seems to be happening in Seattle. Highway congestion has grown in the region, as it has virtually everywhere in the U.S. But per-capita car ownership is on the decline, and total vehicle miles per capita has begun to level off. More importantly, the article cites evidence that growth management laws have concentrated much of the region's recent growth into already-urbanized areas -- the sorts of places where people don't have to make long treks to jobs or stores.

Towards the end of the Seattle Times article comes this telling snippet about a long-time Puget Sound area planner:

Cushman, who studied transportation here for more than 30 years before retiring in July, said he finds a certain irony in what's transpired, noting that the region's snail-like pace in making transportation decisions may actually have helped ease congestion. [Emphasis added.]

In the end, Cushman said, people get tired of waiting, and find their own solutions.

I'm not sure what to make of this, especially the bit in italics, since the whole article is premised on the notion that congestion is getting worse.

But really, it may come down to an issue of how to define congestion: Seattle hasn't built too many big roads recently, so many of its highways really are pretty full, especially at rush hour. But plenty of people are responding by choosing their homes and workplaces so that the congestion doesn't really affect them that much. Which may be one reason that, when measured per commuter, congestion delays in metro Seattle were, if anything, a bit lower [PDF] in 2005 as in 2000.

So maybe it's this: the roads are getting more congested, but the people aren't.

Clark Williams-Derry is research director for the Seattle-based Sightline Institute, a nonprofit sustainability think tank working to promote smart solutions for the Pacific Northwest. He was formerly the webmaster for Grist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 3:28 am
    16 Oct 2007

    Truth be toldIf we don't build one more lane congestion will maintain equilibrium, a steady state. People (like me) find ways to stay out of cars, especially in rush hour, telecommuting, online shopping, biking, a neighborhood that has anything I could ask for. Business is coming to my neighborhood to get my money. NYC would likely be less dense without its subways, but the streets would be no more congested.

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  2. ffletcher Posted 4:15 am
    16 Oct 2007

    Convert LanesConverting lanes that are now used for motor vehicles to lanes for human powered vehicles would improve safety, save energy, and reduce emissions, plus provide the humans powering such vehicles vital exercise.
  3. Icelander Posted 4:48 am
    16 Oct 2007

    Futurama becomes lifeFry proved his prescience yet again when he said "Nobody drives in New York. There's too much traffic"
  4. ac5p Posted 3:44 am
    17 Oct 2007

    Silly?There must be a better way of lowering gasoline consumption than by not building enough infrastructure for people.  How about adding a tax to gasoline?  Then people who really need to drive somewhere can get there without waiting.  In some states private roads are being proposed.  How will that reduce the consumption of energy?
  5. Payton Chung's avatar

    Payton Chung Posted 8:17 am
    17 Oct 2007

    Price, one way or anotherEither congestion or higher  costs for gas/parking/insurance/etc. result in a higher "cost of driving." That cost is either in time or in dollars. It's easier, under our paralyzed political system, to sit around and do nothing (which raises the time cost of driving) than it is to raise gas taxes, parking fees, insurance rates, etc.
    Raise the price of something and people will consume less of it. Pretty simple, eh?
    So yes, ac5p, you're right, we should raise the monetary cost of driving, and we should also raise the time cost as well (removing road and parking capacity, as Copenhagen does). The strategies are not just complementary, they're fundamentally the same strategy.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement