As you can see toward the end there, everything comes down to the fact that nobody -- outside of rarefied energy experts -- believes that alternatives to fossil fuels are here, ready, and reliable. Everything hinges on getting that message out.
Colbert on offshore drilling 17
-
Posted 9:57 AM on 15 Aug 2008
by David Roberts -
Posted in
-
Read More About
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Related Stories
Gore on the Daily Show: extended dance remix
Blowing up our clean energy future
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
odograph Posted 10:02 am
15 Aug 2008
I think that's a better argument than those concerning alt-fuels.
But what alternatives were you thinking of when you wrote "alternatives to fossil fuels are here, ready, and reliable"? Are we just talking bicycles and mass-transit that only a hippie can love?
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 2:19 pm
15 Aug 2008
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 2:52 pm
15 Aug 2008
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 4:47 pm
15 Aug 2008
The problem there though is that all the focus is on Hydrogen and BioFuels.
We need to move that focus onto Revolutionary Efficiency, and Electricity.
And frankly the only way thats going to happen is when we start getting the real deal onto the roads.
So sadly, we're kinda stuck in limbo for the next year and a half.
-David Ahlport
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 4:49 pm
15 Aug 2008
Or even the Tata Nano.
-David Ahlport
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 5:23 pm
15 Aug 2008
Great attitude Odo, you show that you are part of the problem instead of being part of the solution. And guess what, I'm not a hippie, I think they're generally annoying, and I walk, ride my bike, and take public transit.
A far more correct statement is that only those who are so selfish that they don't care about the natural environment could love cars.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 5:35 pm
15 Aug 2008
A gradual decresae in oil demand over many years, that starts now with tire pressure, engine tuneups, biking, carpooling, mass transit use, things that take less investment capital. Get that steady 5% decrease the first couple of years from these easier measures.
Then keep the steady decrease going as more capital intensive mass production of plugin hybrids, solar systems, ground source heat pumps (replacing heating oil use), and upgrading freight rail kicks in.
Obama could outline a practical plan with steady reduction targets that would allow us all to sacrifice and invest a little at first, then more and more collectively as the economy turns around.
Confidence is the human psychology behind curing recession. A clear plan that everyone can particpate in would restore that confidence. It's FDR and the fireside chat telling everyone to pitch in. That same great strategy all over again.
JFKesque? Well yes, "Ask not what your country can do..." time people. Obama has what it takes to get that going.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
odograph Posted 1:54 am
16 Aug 2008
I'm a realist though about how well basically hippie solutions are accepted.
But if you want some good news you can run with, bicycle fatalities are both low and falling further:
http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811017.PDF
I think one of the reasons those non-hippies don't ride is fear.
(BioD, you seemed to restate my efficiency goal ... no word on "alternatives to fossil fuels [] here, ready, and reliable"?
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 2:06 am
16 Aug 2008
The ideals are the same, dirty hippie, anti-war, pro-environment, anti-corporate monopoly, basically a non-violent movement.
Admitting one embraces non-violence as a cultural movement places one firmly in the dirty hippie camp, like it, admit it, or not.
Non-violence is a courageous path, dissing it is a nervous laugh.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
odograph Posted 2:20 am
16 Aug 2008
(wolvie, irony alert!)
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 3:20 am
16 Aug 2008
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 3:46 am
16 Aug 2008
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
odograph Posted 4:10 am
16 Aug 2008
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 5:13 am
16 Aug 2008
Check out the documentary.
http://magicsoapbox.com/doc/
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 3:07 pm
17 Aug 2008
I don't at all agree that if one embraces non-violence or a pro-environment ideology that one is a hippie. These ideas were around millennia before hippies existed. Personally I'm a punk rocker, but that has nothing to do with these ideologies. And many hippies just want to get high and party, and have no particular politics. Stereotypes are one thing, but reality is usually quite different.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:01 pm
17 Aug 2008
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 10:15 am
18 Aug 2008
You live in northern Wisconsin, check out the punk scene in Green Bay, it's supposed to be one of the best in the country. When you do, you'll find that the propaganda propounded by the corporate media has nothing to do with punks. Yes, slam dancing is like football to music, but other than that the vast majority of punks I know are very peaceful and non-violent. The punk look is just a "fuck you" to society, which we hate.
Permalink