Update: Clinton suspended her campaign for the presidency on June 7, 2008.
During her years representing New York state in the U.S. Senate (2001 to the present), Hillary Clinton has earned an 87 percent lifetime voting score from the League of Conservation Voters (lower than it might have been because she's missed some votes while campaigning for president). She has tended to run with the Democratic pack on environmental policy, but in November 2007 she unveiled a comprehensive and ambitious climate and energy plan.
Read an interview with Hillary Clinton by Grist and Outside.
Key Points
- Proposes a Strategic Energy Fund that would raise $50 billion over 10 years by taxing the "excess profits" of oil companies and cutting their tax breaks. The money would be invested in "clean energy technologies," including renewable energy, energy efficiency, "clean coal," plug-in hybrids, cellulosic ethanol and other biofuels, and more. Clinton describes it as "an Apollo Project-like program dedicated to achieving energy independence."
- Calls for cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Would accomplish this through a cap-and-trade system that would auction off 100 percent of emissions permits, making polluters pay for the CO2 they emit.
- Emphasizes the creation of "green-collar jobs" in the fields of clean energy and energy efficiency. Aims to create up to 5 million clean-energy jobs over the next decade.
- Made her campaign carbon-neutral in April 2007, one month after John Edwards did.
- Calls for the U.S. to cut its consumption of foreign oil by two-thirds of projected levels by 2030.
- Supports a goal to get 25 percent of the U.S. electricity supply from renewable sources by 2030.
- Supports raising fleet-wide fuel-economy standards to 40 miles per gallon by 2020 and 55 mpg by 2030.
- Has advocated for a summer "gas-tax holiday" to ease consumer prices at the pump. The proposal would suspend the 18-cent federal gasoline tax and 24-cent diesel tax from Memorial Day to Labor Day, to be paid for by a tax on oil-company profits.
- Supports coal-to-liquid fuels if they emit 20 percent less carbon over their lifecycle than conventional fuels. On June 19, 2007, voted in favor of an amendment that would provide loans for coal projects, including liquefied coal; the amendment did not pass.
Video and Audio
Watch Clinton explain her positions on climate change and energy issues at a Nov. 17, 2007, Grist-sponsored forum:
Watch a "Hillcast" from March 1, 2007, in which Clinton explains her energy vision:
Watch Clinton discuss her energy plans on May 30, 2007, at a rally in Las Vegas:
Listen to a clip of Clinton's interview with Grist and Outside:
Quotable Quotes
- "I know that we have got an important debate going on right now about how we are going to help families deal with these gas prices. They have gone up so fast, so out of sight in the minds of the people that I talk with and I think it's time that we really had a concerted strategy. You've heard me say this and I'll say it again. I think its time to give Americans a break this summer and to make the oil companies pay the gas tax out of their record profits."
-- May 6, 2008, in a victory speech in Indiana
- "We're going to create at least 5 million additional jobs in green energy. Jobs making public buildings more energy efficient. Jobs weatherizing homes to make sure that people get more value for their dollar, to save on home heating and cooling bills. Jobs that will re-open shuttered factories to build the clean energy technologies."
-- April 1, 2008, in a speech to the Pennsylvania AFL-CIO
- "I am concerned about [mountaintop-removal mining] for all the reasons people state, but I think it's a difficult question because of the conflict between the economic and environmental trade-off that you have here. I'm not an expert. I don't know enough to have an independent opinion, but I sure would like people ... to come up with some approach that would enable us to retrieve the coal but would enable us to do it in a way that wouldn't damage the living standards and the other important qualities associated with people living both under the mountaintop and people who are along the streams. You know, maybe there is a way to recover those mountaintops once they have been stripped of the coal."
-- March 19, 2008, in an interview with West Virginia Public Radio
- "The risks of inaction [on climate change], for those who still cling to the outmoded and disgraced view that there is no need for action, are abundantly clear. The consequences are so dire that this election has to focus on this issue. We cannot afford to fiddle while the world warms because we've already seen and we know conclusively what that will do to us."
-- Nov. 17, 2007, speaking in Los Angeles at the Global Warming and America's Energy Future forum sponsored by Grist
- "[O]ur values demand that we be good stewards of the planet for our children and our children's children. We are failing that simple moral test if we continue to stand by as the Earth warms faster than at any time in the past 200,000 years. ... We can fix these problems together by changing to a clean energy future fueled by innovation and efficiency."
-- May 23, 2006, in a speech on energy policy delivered at the National Press Club
Comments View as Flat
Hudson Posted 7:50 pm
09 Aug 2007
Hmmm.
I have serious doubts about Clinton's environmental "cred." I'll cite just two examples of why:
- She was on the board of a notorious polluter, the Lafarge cement company, which burned during her tenure (and continues to burn) major quantities of coal and hazardous waste in their kilns.
- On a more personal level, I was involved with a successful six-and-a-half-year fight against a proposal which, at the time, would have been the largest coal-fired cement plant in the country. Clinton was my Senator. I met with her face-to-face, thanks to someone to whom she owed a big favor, in Washington. She assured me personally that she was on our side against the polluter, and that she would help. She could have made a big difference to thousands of people fighting the good fight. But she never came through... However, after we won, she claimed to have been fighting with us all along.
This was sadly what I'd always heard about Hillary Clinton, but I didn't believe it until it happened to me personally.See my Grist interview for more info on the fight referenced in #2.
--Sam Pratt
Permalink
wendypenner Posted 9:03 pm
17 Nov 2007
Clinton and new coal?
Does she favor a moratorium on new coal power plants?
Permalink
TitanGreens Posted 12:57 am
17 Jan 2008
Clinton in the 2008 Climate Cup
The wild and wacky team at TitanGreens.com took a stab at determining the "greenest candidate" with a fake tournament entitled the 2008 Climate Cup. How will Hillary and rest of the Democratic hopefuls fare under the high-stakes pressure of "The Cup"?
Check it out...
http://titancast.titantv.com/afdfefb5bcec4ccca2f2e5a9ec40 ...
Permalink
planetthoughts Posted 10:23 pm
04 Feb 2008
Sigh.
They all talk so well (that is why they are up there as finalists for president). But I am afraid none of the remaining candidates (except Mike Gravel, who I believe is not on the ballot here in NYS - I will find out in one hour) are serious enough about the environment. In fact, Hillary Clinton here seems to focus only on global warming. Maybe that is in order to avoid blank stares from the audience, but the real problems involve warming, and resources (water, soil) depleting, and other forms of pollution. And 2050? That sounds much too late.
Permalink
AuntBeth Posted 7:30 am
06 Feb 2008
Town Hall broadcast, 2-4-2008
Hillary referred to addressing climate change as the "equivalent of the space race".
I think that should be added.
Permalink
frw Posted 9:18 am
06 Feb 2008
Why only energy issues?
It's not just Hillary, but also Grist and the League of Conservation Voters that have sudden amnesia about every single environmental issue that doesn't directly relate to global warming. Toxins, loss f biodiversity, deforestation, protecting roadless areas, plummeting marine populations, solid waste (the floating mass of trash in the Pacific Ocean) etc. When the enviro.'s stop talking about all of those, I guess they aren't problems anymore. I guess we must have solved all those problems during the past seven years.
Permalink
planetthoughts Posted 9:32 pm
24 Apr 2008
Warming only all the time?
FRW, I am with you 100% i.e. the issues are bigger - and in a way more solvable - than just global warming and CO2 emissions. Oil and energy depletion, pollution, water shortages, and more, these are all vital problems. And they all originate due to a separation of people from our own life support systems, due to an attitude of humans vs. nature, the "conquering" of nature. Summarizing from Chief Seattle: "The Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the Earth". But forgetting that, we saw off the tree limb on which we are sitting. The crash will not be pretty, and may be permanently crippling. It is time to wake up. The answer is to live differently, and to throw out unresponsive governments, and to make this a more humane world for all life.
Permalink