Well, that record cooling trend in January, which was solid evidence (to some) that human-caused global warming was at an end, melted away as fast as the summer ice in the Arctic. Not only did February begin a frighteningly unsustainable warming trend for this year, it saw a record number of tornadoes.
Climate change is making a comeback! In your face, delayer-1000s! And as Jon Stewart -- or the Pope -- might say, damn you, polluters! But where is the news coverage? This is just more proof (as if we needed it) that the media is fundamentally conservative.
Let's start with the temperature. NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies has their monthly global temperature dataset out through Feb. 2008 (it starts in Jan. 1880). January was only 0.12 degrees C above the 1951-1980 mean (for that month) and a full 0.74 degrees C colder than Jan. 2007 (the warmest January record).
But Feb. 2007 was 0.26 degrees C above the monthly mean, and a mere 0.37 degrees C colder than Feb. 2008. The "legitimate science writer" David Appell explains the staggering implications (if we used the same reasoning as typical delayers):
... the world is warming up at 0.14 degrees C/month, or 3 degrees F per year, or a dramatic 30 degrees F per decade! By 2018, Fairbanks Alaska will be like Atlanta was this year. Atlanta will be ... well, like Hell ...
More seriously, this February ripped the tornado record books to shreds as if they had been caught in a giant whirlwind whose intensity had been amplifed by global warming. The country suffered through a stunning 232 tornadoes -- almost triple the previous record, a mere 83 tornadoes in 1971. (Reliable records go back to 1950.)
There is some recent research by NASA that "the most violent severe storms and tornadoes may become more common as Earth's climate warms." More interestingly, the famed blogging nonalarmist meteorologist Jeff Masters explains:
Each of the past three years has seen an unusually early start to tornado season. One would expect to see a shift in tornado activity earlier in the year in a warming climate, along with an earlier than usual drop off in activity in late spring. We can see that in both 2005 and 2006 that tornado activity dropped off much earlier than usual, and it will be interesting to see if 2008 follows a similar pattern. Note that there is a very high natural variability in tornado numbers, and the record for fewest ever January and February tornadoes was set just six years ago in 2002, when only four twisters occurred. It will be at least ten more years before we can say with any confidence that a warming climate is leading to an earlier peak in tornado season.
That spin is a tad nonalarmist for me, especially given that we were just in a brutal one-month regional global-warming-is-over-and-global-cooling-has-begun trend (at least over land in North America). Let's just say that the party is over, delayer-1000s -- you know who you are.
Hopefully we can get back to serious discussions about how we will avoid quadrupling carbon dioxide concentrations from preindustrial levels, and maybe even move on to discussing how we can avoid doubling them to 550 ppm.
Comments
View as Flat
atreyger Posted 12:16 pm
13 Mar 2008
I don't think that you can expect people to follow your alarms if you base it on one year. What if next year we have 9 of the hottest months ever, but January and February are colder than average? Or if there are only three tornadoes, and your idea is in shreds?
Permalink
Angry African Posted 1:12 pm
13 Mar 2008
http://www.angryafrican.net
Permalink
GSchmidt Posted 3:03 pm
13 Mar 2008
Okay, this time around, the snow in Baghdad was mentioned in support of the "it's cold, now wouldn't you care for some of that global warming."
Where I now live in the Baltics, it's been the warmest winter (as in the season) since something like 1928, February has hardly seen any snow.
Back in Austria, this season has brought snow (as opposed to the winter before), and immediately there is less reporting about possible challenges of climate change to skiing industry. However, föhn winds had also brought temperatures up to +15 centigrade, quite a few times.
We had "the one" big storm for this decade (so it sounded in news) in 2007... then January of this year brought "Paula," March brought "Emma"...
I wouldn't say it's global warming, but it sure is different.
Dr. Gerald Schmidt
Positive Ecology Project
http://www.positive-ecology.org
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 1:30 am
14 Mar 2008
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080313_The_Eleph ....
Notice also that global warming comes right after same-sex marriage in the catalogue -- very high praise (right word?) indeed.
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Sam Wells Posted 4:57 am
14 Mar 2008
The question is the amount of aerosol in the water vapor plumes, and where the water vapor plumes go. Dry areas may end up with "dry" lightning storms that create more wildfire, and some coastal water may see more tropical cyclone action.
Or perchance the Bermuda and Continental high pressure cells this summer will become so embedded that it will be like Australia, hot and no rain at all. I've given up on prognosticating just because it's gotten so darn weird. -sammie
Onward through the fog
Permalink
StillSkeptical Posted 7:28 am
14 Mar 2008
Sir, if only you were so capable.
Permalink
stevenearlsalmony Posted 11:16 pm
14 Mar 2008
Although an unwelcome one, a message has somehow got to be responsibly transmitted both to and by the human community's richest, most powerful and famous leaders -- the ones who own mass media, organize public opinion, form government policy and implement action plans -- so that the word goes out from this moment in space-time to our children because the time for ubiquitous, self-limiting behavior change is at hand for the family of humanity. Indeed, the time has come for leadership to acknowledge and accept human limits and Earth's limitations, and act accordingly. Unrestricted human consumption, rampant economic globalization and unregulated propagation activities are now occurring on a colossal scale worldwide. These distinctly human, global "overgrowth" activities appear to be giving rise to emerging global environmental threats that can be reasonably and sensibly managed, modified or otherwise changed, as necessary. We can choose a different behavioral repertoire: for example, less per capita consumption, slowed economic expansion, and the acceptance of humane and voluntary reproduction limits.
Hopefully too much time has not been wasted, too much of the environment irreversibly degraded, too many species massively extirpated, many too many resources recklessly dissipated and too much of the world we inhabit utterly compromised by our relentless consumption, production and propagaton activities in these early years of Century XXI.
Permalink
StillSkeptical Posted 12:21 am
15 Mar 2008
You can continue the series as long as you WANT to.
You MUST continue the series forever!
This is what all this climate change nonsense is about. Energy equals life, and life is unacceptable to the malthusians, all because they are fixated on the second kind of infinity
Permalink
tico89 Posted 3:22 am
15 Mar 2008
I can see that global warming will definitely be a population check, in fact in some--extremely distorted--way it may even be good in that, by sending humanity into crisis and drastically cutting the excess population. But surely the people who believe that are the ones who reject climate change or refuse to do anything about it...not the ones who want to change before it's too late.
So I don't quite get it. I'd welcome any enlightenment
If I share initials with 'Global Warming', is that a sign?
Permalink
gzuckier Posted 4:30 am
28 Mar 2008
"But Feb. 2008 was 0.26 degrees C above the monthly mean, and a mere 0.37 degrees C colder than Feb. 2007."
Permalink