Dear Umbra,
With rising -- OK, skyrocketing -- gas prices, I would like to invest in a car that gets good mileage and is reliable. However, I can't afford a new Toyota Prius. Do you have any suggestions for environmentally friendly used cars that those of us on a budget might be able to invest in? Living in Wyoming, I have to travel long distances on a frequent basis, and public transportation is a joke here, so any suggestions would be appreciated!
Lindy Johnson
Sheridan, Wyo.
Dearest Lindy,
Until today, I thought general guidelines were all the car-purchase advice I was qualified to give. Car experts are people with grease under their fingernails, not papercuts on their fingertips. Then I remembered that I have years of experience buying, owning, repairing, and hearing friends talk about cars. I'm actually very opinionated. So here goes.
First, let me simply regurgitate the basic steps: Figure out the smallest type of car you could use. Look on Consumer Reports' list of most reliable used cars or the Car Talk guys' site to pick three or four that you could afford and enjoy driving. Visit Environmental Defense's Tailpipe Tally and the feds' fuel-economy guide to get an estimate of their spewments. Eliminate any stinkers, and start shopping.
Now, I gotta be me, and me has two words for you: Honda Civic.
From my experience, and that of friends and family, I would buy a Honda Civic (or maybe an Accord) if I were looking for a fuel-efficient, affordable, reliable, used, gas-powered car. They're small, they're cheap, they come in nice colors, and they last forever.
Toyotas are also notoriously reliable, but "retain value" on the used market (aka, "cost more"). Anytime you ask a Toyota fanatic about their brand loyalty, they'll say 100k is just the engine getting broken in. And a friend of mine just traded in a Subaru with over 200k on it, but you'll be hard-pressed to find a Subaru with similar fuel economy to a Civic. I won't mention other names, as I am polite, and if you ask me to talk about American cars, Volkswagens, or Saabs, I will speak about the weather.
Ha! An actual opinion of cars. And I bet you'll have an opinion about my opinion.
Here's another resource, besides me, the web, and your own self-reflection: mechanics. They fix cars. Next time you're near your mechanic, or any mechanic, saunter in and ask what their top lemons and best picks are. If you've already chosen a range of models and model years to consider -- say, a '98-'02 Honda Civic -- ask the mechanic if one of those years is a clunker.
Most of all, trust your instincts.
Jedi-ly (and not Jetta-ly),
Umbra
Comments
View as Threaded
dreadsword Posted 5:51 am
03 Oct 2005
Permalink
vegbakpaker Posted 5:51 am
03 Oct 2005
Permalink
JPatrick Posted 6:46 am
03 Oct 2005
Though the Civic has 160,000 miles, it runs beautifully and uses no oil. I love the car because of its great economy and the way it still drives like it is hardly broken in. I prefer the shifting on the old Toyota, but the Civic is practical, economical, and comfortable. My only regret is that Honda no longer makes a Civic wagon. And I do wonder why.
I don't plan to buy a new car since my Civic Wagon is very cherry. It is so much more useful than the Morris but is fun to drive.
I know we are supposed to believe in progress, but the '90 Civic Wagon is a classic.
Permalink
tdwagner Posted 7:23 am
03 Oct 2005
Permalink
dmsw Posted 8:12 am
03 Oct 2005
Permalink
baad Posted 8:53 am
03 Oct 2005
That's the argument I used to put my wife in a Corolla anyway.
I drive a Honda Insight automatic and can't imagine that I would ever do as badly as 40 something miles per gallon. Of course the manual transmission Insight drivers would probably scoff at my 50 plus miles per gallon.
Permalink
lfunston Posted 9:38 am
03 Oct 2005
That means '95, '00, and '04. Still you're talking about one of the most reliable and fuel efficient cars out there.
Permalink
wallrock Posted 1:22 am
04 Oct 2005
Permalink
marc Posted 6:30 am
04 Oct 2005
The ultimate gas miser may be not the Civic, but the Geo Prism.
Somehow Honda has gained a rep for eco-heroism that I think is based more on marketing than reality
Permalink
2349 Posted 1:02 pm
04 Oct 2005
I have owned a total of 4 cng cars and will never go back (I gave the other 2 to my nephew who loves them too).
Permalink
Gladys Posted 1:18 pm
04 Oct 2005
Nothing bad ever happened.
You could even roll the windows up and down without a key.
35 miles to the gallon on the highway.
What has happened to Subaru? I feel lost and confused.
At a loss in Albuquerque.....
Permalink
TheSSG Posted 5:53 am
05 Oct 2005
Most people are leary of buying a 88-91 EF or a 92-95 Civic, but those are my favorites; cheaper, lighter, the EFs have the 4-wheel Double wishbone suspension too.
A EG Civic HB VX will get you around 50mpg, and those can usually be had for around $2000 here in the midwest. An EF Hatchback can net you 40+mpg, while costing around $1000.
Only problems on these older ones is rust...but that's a stage one weight reduction!!! :)
Permalink
dianectaylor Posted 1:43 pm
08 Oct 2005
I would NEVER buy another Honda.
Permalink
Harry Spider Posted 5:16 am
24 Oct 2005
I bought a Honda Civic HB, DX in 1988. It now has more than 360,000 miles on it. Over 40 mpg regularly, 47 on long highway trips (at 75 mph, with a/c in use).
Head gasket is starting to leak; mpg down to about 37, consumes coolant. Maybe replace the motor, far cheaper than I thought.
In 17 years, it broke down once (faulty ignitor, was replaced at factory expense). CV joints wore out; other things consumed but no excessive repairs ever. Best car investment I ever made.
Stylish car, sporty, fun to drive, good hauling capacity (with seats down), RELIABLE and great fuel economy... other models may exceed one, but no car that I know of can surpass this car in all categories.
A friend is a service manager at Honda. He regularly sees 88-91 era Civics with 300k + miles, several have 400k or more. Even the newer Civics can't match that.
Permalink
Hodbrid Posted 3:22 pm
16 Aug 2007
The new, 2007 Honda CR-V is more powerful, more stylish and more comfortable than the previous-generation 2006 models. Its new suspension geometry delivers an improved ride and better, more responsive handling.
Buyers choose from three models, the LX, the EX and the EX-L. The latter comes trimmed in leather and can be fitted with an optional navigation system that incorporates a rearview video camera for safe and easy backing. All have four doors and seat five.
The engine, still an inline four cylinder, employs variable intake valve timing to optimize horsepower and torque for acceleration and cruising speeds. The transmission is a new, five-speed automatic. Real Time all-wheel drive is offered on all three models. The U.S. EPA rates the front-wheel drive CR-V at 23/30 city/highway miles per gallon and the all-wheel drive at 22/28.
Thus, buyers looking for peppy performance, snazzy styling and easier financing have better choices. But for Honda loyalists looking for something better than their current CR-V or an SUV to step up into from their Civic, the '07 is the logical way to go.
Permalink
bailsout Posted 5:29 am
13 Feb 2008
Now I have discovered my favorite way of transport the Honda Helix scooter. Top speed 70 mph and 60+ mpg. Fun to ride! Very dependable and easy to ride- automatic, electric start, comfortable seating posture and good wind protection from the fairings and windshield.
Permalink