Dear Umbra,
While I usually love your column, I have to take issue with encouraging people to eat sushi. This is the second "green" site I have seen that proposes the solution to overfishing is to eat different fish.
Saying "of course you can continue to eat at sushi restaurants without feeling guilty" amounts to pandering to people who are concerned about environmental problems but are not willing to make meaningful change to improve them. If you are truly concerned about the health of the world's oceans, you should be encouraging people to stop eating sushi and any fish. I do not believe these "conscientious meat-eaters" truly exist. No matter how you change the system (grass-fed, organic, free-range), animal agriculture is innately harmful to the ecosystem.
According to Umbra, you can have your fish and eat it too. I say if you want to save the fish, stop eating them.
Benjamin Martin
Wallingford, Conn.
Dearest Benjamin,
I take umbrage with your excellent letter. (Ha. I've written this dang column for what seems like 32 years and not once have I used that terrible pun. Oh, wait, I did use it one other time. What a fab search engine we have.)
Do you have to kiss your sushi good-bye?
Photo: iStockphoto
I didn't say the solution was to eat different fish. I said the solution is to learn about the fish you are eating, become disgusted by some of it, and revel in the atmosphere at the sushi restaurant. Sushi isn't all fish -- in fact, the Japanese word only refers to the rice, she said defensively.
You do have an excellent point about fish-eating. If one truly cares for all the fishes of the world, one should stop eating all the fishes of the world. In theory. But if that were the sum total of my approach to advice, I would shortly be out of work. Picture the crank-fest that would be this downer of a column: Umbra, what should I do about light bulbs? If you were truly ecological, you would never need new light bulbs because you would never turn on the lights. What about green movers? Sorry, nothing requiring internal combustion engines can truly be "green." What about bathroom mold? Why is there mold in the bathroom? Are you using water, you wastrel?
Even though I strongly believe, with all the rest of you, that we need to consider the environment in all our choices, I do not believe that no or none is the only answer. I also believe in less, fewer, different, selective, imaginative. Because recruitment is our path to success. No one wants to join a No Fun Club, and no one wants to read Umbra Says No Again on a twice-weekly basis.
My duty is to provide a humorous way to mediate the consumer-fest that is our lives, and periodically remind us all of the main points of environmental action. Only a little wrist-slapping. Some of the wrist-slapping relates to food. Eating less, or no, meat is a main action we can take to reduce our impact on the environment. Land meat uses lots of water, pollutes water, and takes up a lot of space. Air meat is either an endangered no-no or socially unacceptable (squab, anyone?). Sea meat is often non-sustainably harvested (but is generally not agriculture, I must point out).
However, not all fishing is an ocean-bottom-scraping, groundwater-salinating, run-depleting disaster story, just as not all land meat is a travesty of wasted resources. Some fisheries are well-regulated, self-regulated, species-regenerating, and income-generating models of how the world needs to operate as a whole, lest we destroy Earth as we know it.
In fact, fishery success stories are among the most exciting environmental news stories I read. Supporting sustainably run fisheries is similar to buying organic food: With your money, you show food suppliers that eco-labels matter to consumers. Soon enough, producers -- in our example, fisherpersons -- are able to risk the change to ecological management because they can rely on the resultant market-based rewards.
Humans need to eat, and I cannot delude myself into believing the Revolution will come and make everyone vegetarian. You can, if you want. Be who you are. And eat all the sushi you like -- it's only vinegared rice.
Unagi,
Umbra
What can China teach us about electric bikes?
Has Big Organic passed its sell-by date?
One year later, a Happy Meal doesn't decompose
Comments
Post a Comment +
Impacts of all food productionI hate to say it, but almost all large scale food production is harmful to the environment. The fertilizer applied to the huge farms in the midwest leaches into the Mississippi and results in the growing Dead Zone in the gulf. This is just one example among many of the environmental impact of producing the grains, fruits and vegetables that we consume.
There are sustainable farmers just as there are sustainable fisheries, but in both cases we ...read more
Have your sushi and eat it too.....sushi filled with brown rice, shitake mushrooms, garnet yam, sundried tomatoes, smoked tofu, avocado and a little mirin is amazing..you don't need to eat fish to enjoy the best sushi and all the wasabi and ginger you can handle.
J.S.
bad analogiesIt is quite surprising that Umbra should make this false equivalence: refusing to eat fish is not at all analogous to refusing to turn on lights or refusing to use indoor plumbing. So, sure, I understand if she does not want to re-title her column "Umbra says No! yet again." But every now and then, it is the right thing to do, to set down one's foot.
A couple of nights ago, ABC News closed its Charles Gibson show with a look at an experimental aquaculture ...read more
moderationmoderation in all things.
this is what my wisest of wise mothers taught me.
it serves me well in this life.
in this REAL world that we chose to live in (or we'd all be in yurts somewhere else OFF the grid)it is dang-gone near impossible to escape large scale comercial anything, no matter how hard we try.
THANK YOU UMBRA for your nod to real people who live in the real world.
Human populationI believe that all environmental and sustainability problems of planet Earth always boil doin to one single source: excess of human beings on this planet. It is sad to say, but we have become a cancer that is consuming everything and ultimately will destroy our host and thus ourselves. So, to me, the only solution to all these problems would be to drastically reduce the human population within a very short period of time and then keep it low.
No more ...read more
Moderation sounds good..but we do not want moderate amounts of torture, slavery, terrorism, or species extinction right? The point- not everything is a slippery slope where we need to search for a middle ground- there are some rights and wrongs, some dos and donts, some things to support and others to avoid. Sometimes the answers are not so complex.
And sometimes fish is a better choice...As Jessa mentioned, large scale production of grains and vegetables is far from environmentally benign.
And some kinds of fishing are clearly the best choice for their envrironment.
Take a well-managed wild salmon fishery (e.g. Alaska). To maintain the salmon fishery, you need healthy, clean, and free-flowing rivers. Many other animals and plants also depend on these rivers. Fishing in this case is a wilderness-compatible industry ...read more
I don't disagree...BUT....how do you think that fish in Alaska gets to your plate in the continental 48? A: it doesn't swim- it takes tons of energy to refrigerate fish and ship it thousands of miles- much more energy than producing grains and shipping then (on a calorie basis). Also, much of the fish sold as wild is not- it is farmed but people cheat to make extra money.
fish transitGood questions, J.S.
In answer...
Thousands of years before refrigeration, salmon was smoked or dried for preservation. I suspect, with the removal of water and the fact that it doesn't need to be refrigerated, that the transport cost per calorie isn't higher than any other dried food (perhaps better). And smoked salmon is very tasty.
As for fresh fish - it suffers from the same problem as fresh produce. Eating anything fresh that's not local and in season ...read more
Fish FarmsI figured I'd add that I once read that in Fish farms...they CATCH fish to feed the fish, or USE fish...which were caught...
So, in practice, many fish farms, which help "prevent overfishing" are really just re-distributing the over-fishing; you may be saving salmon, but Screwing sardines....