In a letter [PDF] made public today, former deputy EPA administrator Jason Burnett indicates that both the Office of the Vice President and the Council on Environmental Quality have attempted to censor discussion of the consequences that global warming poses to human health.
Burnett, who went public about the administration's obstruction after leaving the EPA in early June, detailed the interference in a letter to Environment and Public Works Chair Barbara Boxer responding to an inquiry [PDF] she sent to him last week. In the letter, which was made public today, Burnett outlines several instances of White House interference with the agency's findings.
He says that in December, the White House asked him not to send the endangerment findings, though Burnett had already emailed them to the White House Office of Management and Budget. Upon realizing the document had already been sent, Burnett says he received a "phone call from the White House" asking him to to send a follow-up email saying that the document "had been sent in error."
"I explained I could not do this because it was not true," writes Burnett.
He also notes that in the fall of 2007, the Council on Environmental Quality and the Office of the Vice President asked him to work with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention to remove portions of their report detailing the threats that climate change poses to human health.
And in January of this year, when EPA officials were preparing their testimony to Boxer's committee for a hearing about the decision to deny California a waiver, an official in the Office of the Vice President called Burnett to tell him that they wanted the phrase "greenhouse-gas emissions harm the environment" altered in the prepared remarks. Burnett refused, and in the end the testimony was presented as prepared.
EPW chair Boxer held a press conference today on this new information. "I have met with Mr. Burnett, who informed me that he resigned from the agency after concluding that no constructive action on global warming would take place during this Administration," said Boxer. "What a sad day it is for the American people that they lost a brilliant professional who wanted to protect us from the ravages of global warming."
"We now know that this censorship was part of a master plan," Boxer continued. "History will judge this Bush administration harshly for recklessly covering up a real threat to the people they are supposed to protect."
Boxer is asking that EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson release every document related to the Agency's endangerment finding, including the email that the White House has refused to open. She's also requesting that the EPA release their Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on global warming emissions in its original form. She called for Johnson's resignation if he doesn't bring forward these documents, and pledged to do everything within the committee's power to obtain those documents.
Boxer said that the EPW Committee will hold a hearing on July 22 on the most recent evidence of the health threats posed by global warming, in which Burnett will be called as a witness. She said they will also host a hearing in the fall and draft a committee report on the findings for the next administration.
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success
For McCain, it’s really all about the fake snow
Comments
View as Flat
christophersj Posted 3:14 pm
08 Jul 2008
It looks like, except for AP, this was released late in the day and got lost in the shuffle. Let's hope it gets more coverage tomorrow (Wednesday).
Permalink
dobermanmacleod Posted 9:12 pm
08 Jul 2008
In my opinion, those VP Cheney is trying to protect are the same people that Republican policy is designed to benefit, and it continues to amaze me why the common man keeps supporting the Republican party even though it is directly against their best interests. It is sort of like arguing about family values while your house is being burglarized. I console myself by repeating the mantra: America is a democracy, so gets the government it deserves.
We must be really bad.
Permalink
Ariell Posted 10:24 pm
08 Jul 2008
Permalink
Bob Wallace Posted 1:32 am
09 Jul 2008
The Republican Party has been very successful in identifying and exploiting issues that caused people to vote for them (and often against their own interests).
They've used the Communist threat, racism, sexism, homophobia, abortion, and fear to gain votes.
Now Communism is dead. Racism dying out (the Helms generation is going). Women have largely reached parity. People are no longer afraid of gays. The most objectionable types of abortion are outlawed. And the current Administration has hollered "WOLF" so often that people no longer pay attention.
Even wealthy Republicans are starting to understand that we need foreign workers if we're going to get our crops picked and our meat processed.
What issues that concern working people are left for the Republicans to exploit?
Well, there is the fear of Islam taking over the world. They're pushing that one at the moment.
Permalink
Masked Goddess Posted 1:55 am
09 Jul 2008
And yeah Burnett, its easy to have courage once you left the job instead of standing up and doing the right thing while you had it. Coward.
Permalink
PermieWriter Posted 3:06 am
09 Jul 2008
These folks have been gradually disillusioned and are coming out of a powerfully persuasive environment. If they're to be joined by more of their former colleagues, those who are still in the Bush fold need to see that they'll be welcomed by the other side (i.e. us).
Eat what you grow, grow what you eat
Permalink
christophersj Posted 3:17 am
09 Jul 2008
By the way, this story is DEAD today. WTF????
Permalink
GreenEngineer Posted 3:22 am
09 Jul 2008
Also, for anyone who is actively trying to make positive change from within the system (as opposed to standing on the sidelines, slinging mud and insults), there is a constant tension between the compromises required to remain within the system, and the potential to do good by remaining within the system. It's a tough decision, and it's one that must be revisited frequently, and the "right" answer is never obvious.
I don't know the details, but I don't get the impression that Burnett is a Scott McClellan, i.e. a disillusions former believer. Instead, he seems like someone who was trying to do the right thing and make change from within the system, and eventually got fed up and left. He may not have gone public while still employed by the EPA (very possibly because it might have opened him up to prosecution), but he did refuse, on principle, to honor the White House's (absurd) request for truthiness while still employed by the government.
As far as I can tell, this guy is a hero.
Permalink
Masked Goddess Posted 4:14 am
09 Jul 2008
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 6:11 am
09 Jul 2008
That said, it's good that these people come forward at some point. Or it's at least not as bad as not coming forward at all.
Permalink
christophersj Posted 7:57 am
09 Jul 2008
http://web.mac.com/cjohnsonla
Permalink
guade00 Posted 3:55 pm
09 Jul 2008
Do we really want this White House and this EPA to create sure-to-be-cozy-to-industry rules on greenhouse gas emissions anyway?
Permalink
PermieWriter Posted 3:14 am
10 Jul 2008
Eat what you grow, grow what you eat
Permalink
christophersj Posted 3:51 am
10 Jul 2008
My suspicion is that you do not believe in the ability to right the whole situation, is that right? I do. Many of us do. You sound like you have given up.
Permalink
usandthem Posted 2:55 am
19 Jul 2008
Why not ask why!?
Permalink