Can you spell c-o-a-l?

The dirty secret behind D.C.‘s high-tech Virginia suburbs 7

There's a chance the presidential election will come down to who wins the state of Virginia. And the key to winning Virginia comes down to who does well in the D.C. suburbs of northern Virginia. This area is an economic powerhouse where no fewer than one in three Virginia voters live. Just mention the words "northern Virginia" across the mid-Atlantic region and the hyphenated adjectives come back at you: Fast-growing, high-tech, well-educated, high-income.

No wonder the presidential candidates can't seem to stay away from the area. Despite perennial traffic congestion, "NoVa" has that certain gleam of 21st century life, from the glitzy high-rises of Rosslyn to the corporate campuses around the Dulles airport to the performing arts stage at a place called Wolf Trap. Fairfax County alone, the heart of the region, has a higher percentage of high-tech workers than Silicon Valley.

So, as the election approaches, here's the surprising question for every Northern Virginia voter: Why is this high-tech region, so dedicated to a "knowledge-based" economy, utterly dependent on an energy system as old as the Confederate States of America? Northern Virginia gets the lion's share of its electric power not from wind turbines or solar farms, but from coal. A shocking 1,180,400 tons of raw coal each year, nearly half of the area's total load. And it's not "clean coal" or "high-tech" coal. Just black, sooty, rip-it-from-the-ground-and-set-it-on-fire coal.

You'd think it would be different. You'd think Northern Virginia would be a leader in developing clean, sustainable energy at a level equal to its high-tech, high-education status.

You'd think. But two roadblocks stand in the way: Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine (D) and mega-utility Dominion Power. Both Kaine and Dominion are implacably wedded to coal. Forever, apparently. No matter what the economic and ecological cost. Indeed, while the equally high-tech suburbs of Denver build new wind-turbine factories and the outer-D.C. suburb of Frederick County, Maryland, is expanding a major solar-panel plant (owned by British Petroleum), Dominion Power just broke ground on a new coal-fired power plant it says is necessary because of rising energy demand throughout Virginia. Where is demand rising fastest, according to Dominion? Northern Virginia. And the threat is explicit, Dominion says. Unless the new 585-megawatt plant, using mountaintop-removal coal and totally lacking any equipment to capture global-warming pollution, is built, there will be rolling blackouts and brownouts across Virginia soon.

Did you know that, Northern Virginia? Did you know Dominion is building a massive coal-burning energy complex essentially in your name? In addition to emitting more than 5 million tons of greenhouse gases annually, the coal plant in southwest Virginia will dump 5.4 pounds of mercury into local streams and lakes annually.

But perhaps the biggest tragedy is Gov. Kaine's argument that the plant will actually create jobs. The state's own official analysis, performed by the State Corporation Commission, concluded otherwise. It determined that the high price tag of the plant -- a whopping $1.8 billion -- would actually raise ratepayers' rates so much as to cause the entire Virginia economy to shrink by 1,400 jobs. The plant would hurt, not help, working families in the state.

If you want jobs, look at what Xcel power is doing in Colorado. Until recently, Xcel was a coal-at-all-costs company like Dominion. But the firm has now seen the truth: In a world of rapid global warming and rising fossil-fuel costs, the future lies in wind and solar. As you read this, Xcel is preparing to voluntarily shut down two old coal plants. It is simultaneously investing heavily in wind power and solar; construction of two new turbine manufacturing plants near Denver was just announced, creating 1,350 new jobs in the state. Doesn't that sound like an approach more befitting of Virginia's high-tech corridor?

Ironically, Gov. Kaine was just in Denver for the Democratic convention. Did the Governor tour the new Xcel wind-turbine factory sites? Did he meet with company officials to see how they do it? No. Instead, he was a guest of honor at a fancy convention party thrown by, yep, Dominion Power. The same company building the coal plant in Virginia. The same company that's given Kaine nearly a quarter million dollars in campaign contributions since 2001. Hmmm.

The truth is this: Virginia doesn't need more power in the future. Virginia uses too much power in the present. The state is one of the most energy inefficient states in America, ranking 32nd in terms of utility and state government investment in efficiency programs. Its people use more electricity every day than 75 percent of the rest of America. Surely we could do much, much better.

Just switching to high-efficiency light bulbs will save energy equal to half of what the proposed new coal plant will create. Installing "Smart Meters" in homes and offering rebates for high-efficiency refrigerators would save several times more power, making the new coal plant and the alleged threats of blackouts utterly impossible. And consumers will save money not lose jobs in the process. Then add a couple of large offshore wind farms along the Virginia coast, and suddenly Virginia is a clean energy leader, not laggard.

If it's true that Obama and McCain are listening to the wishes of Northern Virginia voters more than ever, then it's time for the wealthiest, best-educated, and most high-tech people in this region to finally speak with a loud voice: Coal was for yesterday. Clean energy is for today. It's time to choose.

Mike Tidwell is executive director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network and the author, most recently, of The Ravaging Tide: Strange Weather, Future Katrinas, and the Coming Death of America’s Coastal Cities.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Borzio Posted 2:42 pm
    20 Oct 2008

    Natural variationHere is something interesting. From 2006 to 2007 we had a very large drop in Arctic sea ice coverage. For the current date, that difference is shown here.
    http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu...
    This change had the warmers calling for the end of the world "even sooner than expected".
    Now we have had another change in the opposite direction. Again taking the same day (today) in 2007 and comparing it to 2008 we have:
    http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu...
    So going from 2006 to 2008 we have hardly any change at all:
    http://igloo.atmos.uiuc.edu...
    Now while the drop from 2006 to 2007 was trumpeted all over the left wing media and the ecological media, the recovery from 2007 to 2008 is not mentioned at all. No agenda there, right?
  2. dirthippy Posted 9:16 pm
    20 Oct 2008

    Dominion Wind PowerI live in Frederick, Md. While I am usually not on the side of the power companies because I am a dirty hippy at heart, I have to disagree with Mike on this one. Yes, the mid-Atlantic area is polluted, you shouldn't eat the fish from the rivers, and we are quite overcrowded. However, Dominion has been making efforts to add more wind power to its quiver. They have built bunches of wind turbines on Mount Storm, W.Va., adjacent to their power plant. They are also partnering with BP to build more wind turbines in Virginia. You can read more about their new agreement at http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS163478+21 ...
    You can read more about their plans for the power from Mt. Storm on the Dominion website at http://www.poweringvirginia.com/wind.jsp.
    I know that most of our power still comes from dirty coal, but at least they are working toward wind power, even if it is for their own bottom line.
  3. stinkycheese Posted 11:58 pm
    20 Oct 2008

    Re: natural variationBorzio, this article talks about mercury poisoning and job loss and energy inefficiency in Virginia. I assume that you agree that these are all bad things. Global warming is mentioned only in passing and is not the salient point of the article. If you're going to complain about the ecological left wing media again, then you could at least answer the concerns voiced in this article along with your canned anti-AGW argument (and non-functioning links) which confuses weather with climate.
  4. TheGreenMiles Posted 12:51 am
    21 Oct 2008

    And the trolls come out to playWow, the first two comments are from a global warming denier and a power company apologist. Mike must be doing something right!

    Join the discussion on global warming, recycling, and organic beer at The Green Miles!
  5. amazingdrx Posted 1:15 am
    21 Oct 2008

    OffshoreYes Virginia, there is plenty of fuel-free, clean energy offshore.  
    The gulf stream underwater, a steady source, wind and wave above the water.  Put those high tech industrial workers on the job, they'll make a whole new revenue source for your region.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
  6. evabella Posted 1:50 am
    21 Oct 2008

    So, NoVa voters:How will you get this message across?
  7. rwhiten1 Posted 4:40 am
    21 Oct 2008

    That solar plant in Frederick...."the outer-D.C. suburb of Frederick County, Maryland, is expanding a major solar-panel plant (owned by British Petroleum)"
    A class mate of mine in my MBA program works for BP Solar and indicated, a few months back, that BP had pulled the plug on that plant in Frederick to open it somewhere else (I think China, but not certain).
    It may be they have changed their mind and decided to reopen it, but I don't think so.  I will check with my class mate.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement