California's Proposition 2 -- deftly profiled by Carol Ness -- passed in a landslide on Tuesday.
The new law is simple and hardly earth-shaking; it requires that "calves raised for veal, egg-laying hens, and pregnant pigs be confined only in ways that allow these animals to lie down, stand up, fully extend their limbs and turn around freely."
In other words, you can still cage farm animals, but you have to give them minimal room to move around. And it doesn't go into effect until 2015.
Yet industrial-farming interests are squawking like hens about to lay a huge egg. That the industry finds such a commonsense requirement intolerable reveals just how dependent it is on imposing cramped conditions. The backlash against Prop. 2 also betrays a (very encouraging) fear that California's code will go nationwide.
The American Farm Bureau -- the "Voice of [Industrial] Agriculture" -- "expressed disappointment" about the passage of the measure, fretting that it would spell the end of the state's egg and pork industries.
The National Pork Producers went so far as to "decry" the measure, complaining bitterly that "animal-rights groups were successful in vilifying honest, hardworking farmers and ranchers who treat their animals humanely and provide them a safe, healthy environment in which to grow." Ha!
Comments
View as Flat
mueneeez Posted 1:25 pm
06 Nov 2008
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 4:34 pm
06 Nov 2008
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 12:50 am
07 Nov 2008
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 3:32 am
07 Nov 2008
My own more cynical interpretation is that the 63% majority did indeed feel they were doing something good by voting Yes for Proposition 2; but of them, probably a sizeable majority did not fully understand what they were voting for, and had not considered economic consequences.
As for Wolverine's interesting suggestion, is there in fact any scientific evidence that the eggs of happy-go-lucky chickens taste better than those of miserable, tortured chickens? And if so, is the determining factor really the emotional state of the mama chicken?
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Wolverine Posted 3:55 am
08 Nov 2008
How does one acquire scientific evidence for such a subjective conclusion? That's like asking if there is any scientific evidence that the Beatles made better music than the Rolling Stones.
My comment is based on the difference in taste between eggs in restaurants, which are the commercial kind, and the eggs we buy for home. It's similar to wild meat, such as salmon, tasting better and being more nutritious than domesticated meat.
Permalink
Storm Dragon Posted 4:49 am
08 Nov 2008
Let the jaguars return!
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 5:36 am
08 Nov 2008
In the case of salmon, there seems to be more than mere subjectivity going on. The great majority of piscivores, I believe it is fair to say, declare that there is a world of difference between the meat of wild salmon, and that of farmed salmon -- and they by far prefer the former. And it seems to be commonly accepted that the reason for the difference in taste is to be found in the different lifestyles and diets of the two kinds of fish, and NOT in their emotional health, however attractive that suggestion may be to some of us.
As for the role of connoisseurship in evaluating Early Music, the Beatles and the Stones are both supremely delightful bands; but their styles are so different that it is easily possible for a listener to prefer one to the other, without suggesting that that one is "better," and the other "worse."
Up there with the Beatles and the Stones, by the way, is Neil Young, whether with Crosby, Stills and Nash or solo. On the other hand, the most over-rated band in music history is the Doors; and probably the second most over-rated is the Who. IMHO : )
Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Annimal Posted 6:06 am
08 Nov 2008
Here's the whaler reply to meat eating.
They say whale meat is " sustainable" , free range , " animal-friendly , without hormones and antibiotics and carbon low and not destroying habitat.
http://annimal.bloggsida.se/diverse/reply-from-laila-from ...
As this is meant as a somewhat controversial debate article , you can also forward your message at my blog.
The Independent writes: Whale Steak OK for Greens in Norway "
http://annimal.bloggsida.se/diverse/whale-steak-ok-for-gr ...
There are anti whaling posts as well :
http://annimal.bloggsida.se/diverse/my-opinion-on-whales
Permalink
ScintillatingSkua Posted 9:19 am
08 Nov 2008
Prop 2 will take affect in 2015 so HOW THE $#$%^%^ can the factory prisons claim higher prices. They are fear-mongers who want to keep their Cadillacs at the expense of humane treatment of god's beautiful gifts to humanity. What price corruption.
Let me remind you that these practices are ILLEGAL in Europe and have been for as long as I have been in this industry. May Fac/Prison owners come back as pregnant sows in their own wretched Factories.
Bio-Organic Sheep Ranch Farmer who made a fine living caring for her "products" as nature intended.
Permalink
Annimal Posted 9:57 am
08 Nov 2008
I love your PASSION FOR ANIMALS. THANKS!!!!
Permalink
ScintillatingSkua Posted 2:16 pm
08 Nov 2008
... 12 pages showing our air, water, and land absolutely abused by these righteous filth- mongers. They make $ hand over fist. They hide everything and want to hold onto the status quo even when it is unethical, immoral, dishonest. What kind of country have we become to befoul our natural resources in the name of big $ and uphold inhumane treatment to innocent beings. Let's dethrone these savages and give the small honest hard-working farmer our business - not prison/torturer/polluter/slayer of kind animals. Behind bars is where they belong.
Bio-Organic Sheep Ranch Farmer who made a fine living caring for her "products" as nature intended.
Permalink
Melony76 Posted 3:34 am
10 Nov 2008
Permalink
vaderkit Posted 5:33 am
13 Nov 2008
The answer to the overwhelming factory farming tradegy is for each one of us to walk our talk and turn to a VEGAN diet.
One by one we can change our country.
This will enhance tha air we breath, curb our over-dependence on oil, heal our soil, feed so many more people and put humanity back on a more sustainable, health, and blanced track.
Change your diet and change our world!!!!
Permalink
Emily H Posted 7:39 am
13 Nov 2008
Permalink