Department of bad jokes

CAFOs: ‘Above the Law’ like Steven Seagal? 4

seagallYou looking at me, punk? Okay, okay. I’ve got a good one for you. Ready?

Q: Why are CAFOs just like B-movie action “star” Steven Seagal?

A: Because despite being Under Siege, Marked for Death and On Deadly Ground, they remain Hard to Kill and, even worse, Above the Law.

The ultimate example of this has got to be the Excel Diary CAFO in Minnesota. El Dragón from Fair Food Fight has the details:

Fair Food Fight reported on Excel Dairy back in 2008, when the dairy became the first CAFO in Minnesota to be declared a public health hazard—so noxious and obnxious is Excel, that even the Minnesota Milk Producers Association hung them out to dry.)

A year later, it’s only gotten worse. So far in 2009, the dairy has wracked up over 100 fines (the dairy was issued over 500 last year, so that’s an improvement), emissions of hydrogen sulfide have exceeded the state maximum, several evacuations have taken place, and, in June and July, Excel was ordered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to empty two of its three manure lagoons. Luckily, there have been no cattle on the operation this year, giving the land and the neighbors a bit of a rest.

Bafflingly, Pollution Control officials could have put a stop to all this back in April but didn’t. At an emotional MPCA Board meeting April 2009 to discuss whether or not to issue a new permit to Excel, owner/operator Rick Milner told the board that he wouldn’t or couldn’t comply with any conditions requiring him to clean up his own mess.

...Despite Milner’s efforts to give MPCA every reason to deny him, the permit was issued anyway, and Milner has plans to move 1500 heads back onto the dairy in January and resume bolstering his manure lagoons in 2010. Furthermore, according to MinnPost’s Ron Way, the state could have evoked its “superfund” law to clean up the mess and bill the dairy. But didn’t.

El Dragón wonders who in the state can act to shut this guy down. Even the Minnesota’s Department of Health can’t do much more than beg the state’s pollution control board to do its job. The Minnesota Post article linked above does a great job tracing the failings of the state’s system of environmental enforcement against the ag sector. But this isn’t just about Minnesota—this phenomenon is replicated in states across the country, from Iowa to North Carolina.

What fascinates me is the fact that public health risks are pushed so far down the list—the system can’t seem to take them into account. I guess it helps when you’ve depopulated rural counties through consolidation, stripped municipal governments of development authority over their own land and effectively captured state regulatory agencies so that when a CAFO does move in to a populated area, residents are all but powerless to stop them. And then, you leave it up to a single pollution control board as the only real choke point—creating a small target at which industry groups and captured ag departments can focus all their fire. In this case, it sounds like the state attorney general is getting involved and perhaps there will be a happy ending here.

Still, the system remains rigged to let these CAFO get built and operate with zero regard for the consequences. But you know how it is in this country, keep that retail price nice and low and you can get away with just about anything.

Tom is a media and technology professional who thinks that wrecking the planet is a bad idea. He twitters madly and blogs here and at Beyond Green about food policy, alternative energy, climate science and politics as well as the multiple and various effects of living on a warming planet.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. El Dragón's avatar

    El Dragón Posted 7:55 am
    21 Oct 2009

    In that April meeting, Milner apparently said he doesn't have the money to make the reparations that the Pollution Control agency wants him to make. So it's hard to figure what the State gets out of Excel Dairy -- not taxes, anyway, if he has no revenue. Not jobs, since that operation is all but shut down. All Minnesota gets is the (correct) perception that they're completely ill-equipped to deal with a public health hazard.

    There's something in this story that doesn't add up.

    It would be a total joke if people's lives weren't being wrecked. Check out the YouTube videos made by families waging a stink-war with Excel Dairy:

    http://www.fairfoodfight.com/blog/el-dragón/dairy-dairy-quite-contrary
  2. foodprovider's avatar

    foodprovider Posted 8:57 am
    21 Oct 2009

    As the dairies get bigger, so will the challenges. The disposal of wastes is one of the biggest issues facing animal agriculture today. This would be a great opportunity to explore the usage of a manure digester to 1) capture mathane gas to create energy. 2) reduce to amount of wastes needing to be applied to the fields as crop nutrients, and 3) recycle the sand bedding for reuse.

    Unfortunately the costs are in most cases higher than the benefits. It would take a minimum of somewhere near 1000 animal units to become feasible.
    1. mskellyann's avatar

      mskellyann Posted 9:57 am
      22 Oct 2009

      Which is why you'd need a coop. Here in Vermont, a cooperative approach is making "cow power" a viable option.

      And here's hoping that dairy farm sizes are on the decline, and the number of family farms increases instead.
      1. foodprovider's avatar

        foodprovider Posted 2:39 pm
        22 Oct 2009

        Yes there is strength in numbers. As long as the co-op has the best intrest of it's patron in mind and not the profitability of the co-op in mind.

        Unfortunately, I don't foresee the shrinking of the farm sizes. Not enough labor, too high of overhead costs, not to mention the rules and regulations that add alot of the cost. That puts a smaller operation behind the 8-ball right away. They not only worry about where and how much 1000 cows crap, but also how much and where 50 cows crap. If you are forced to build a manure system for 50, the cost per cow will drive it out of business.

        Not sure what is better, 1 well run 1000 cow dairy, or 20 - 50 cow dairies that may be run by people that don't have the management skills of the 1000 cow operation. It is a problem, it needs a GOOD solution.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement