Hi Umbra!
I just recently became a stay-at-home mom. Life is bliss, except for the one-income household we now have (my husband brings home the tofu-bacon). Now that we have very limited funds I cannot afford to buy all organic food. Sometimes organic food is nearly double the price of conventional food ... yikes! I looked around and could not find a great website for foods you need to buy organic. I know that some conventional foods are not so pesticide-laden as others, but I'm not sure which. Could you please tell me this: if you could buy only some organic food, what should it be?
Tammi
Bailey, Colo.
Dearest Tammi,
Apologies for not explicitly providing this basic resource to dearest readers. I've mentioned the Environmental Working Group's produce shopping guide, but that doesn't help you search the Ask Umbra archives for "best organic foods." Sorry.
Basket case.
Photo: iStockphoto
The EWG guide is designed to answer the "which food" question for fresh fruits and vegetables. EWG looked at USDA food consumption data and USDA and FDA pesticide residue tests, and developed a pesticide residue ranking from worst to best for 44 types of produce. If you have specific concerns, you may wish to read more about EWG's methodologies -- for example, common habits of peeling and washing are incorporated into the tests.
The 12 fruits and vegetables with the highest amount of pesticide residues are peaches, apples, sweet bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, lettuce, imported grapes, pears, spinach, and potatoes. These are the ones to spend your money on. The 12 with the lowest residues are onions, avocado, frozen sweet corn, pineapples, mangoes, frozen sweet peas, asparagus, kiwi, bananas, cabbage, broccoli, and eggplant. When short of cash, go ahead on conventionally grown versions of these.
The shopping guide gets us started on produce, but how about the rest of our diet? Consumer Reports has an interesting series of articles about prioritizing among organic products. Their top priorities include the produce chosen by EWG. They also believe meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy should be an organic priority because of risks including mad cow and the antibiotics and hormones used in conventional animal husbandry. Their third top priority is baby food, for reasons of small bodies and potential concentrated residues in processed purees.
I agree with these personal health priorities, in part because they correlate with larger environmental concerns. A link between pesticide residue and pesticide application seems likely, and large-scale meat production benefits only the financial bottom line.
A prime offender?
Photo: iStockphoto
The rest of the Consumer Reports list is intriguing: They say if price is no object, go ahead and buy organic grains and processed foods. However, they argue, these foods lose many nutrients and "health value" during processing, hence do not offer enough added value in their organic form to always justify the price increase. To me, making that argument from a personal-health perspective does not exempt those who can afford to buy all organic from doing so based on environmental stewardship. CR also pooh-poohs organic seafood, because no U.S. certification exists, and organic cosmetic products, based in part on another report from EWG, because they apparently are often fraudulent. Egad.
The magazine does offer a series of tips on saving money while shopping organic, including comparison shopping, comparison shopping at the farmers' market, buying directly from livestock producers, and joining a Community Supported Agriculture program. OK -- wait -- it looks like I've never written about CSA, either. Could someone please send in a question for me to answer?
Let me just briefly add other cash-saving ideas, including forming a buying club with friends to deal directly with a food distributor, buying large bulk amounts at stores that offer a discount for so doing (my local co-op gives a 10 percent discount on 25-pound bags of rice, for example), and buying fewer animal products.
Correctively,
Umbra
Comments
View as Flat
Kathleen Posted 3:26 am
08 Aug 2007
Permalink
Ariana Posted 4:47 am
08 Aug 2007
What caught my attention was seeing bananas on the safe list. While the peel probably shields us eaters from all the nasties used to grow them, Pesticide Action Network North America tells us, "Pesticide use on plantation bananas is more than 20 times greater than average pesticide use on crops in industrialized countries, with corresponding levels of worker pesticide exposures and illness." (http://www.panna.org/resources/gpc/gpc_200404.14.1.06.dv. ...) Are we really only interested in protecting the meal in front of us?
I would be interested in finding lists that factor ecological and human rights concerns into the what-to-buy-organic equation. For me, those are the highest-priority reasons for shopping organic in the first place. And, like, shouldn't ecological impact trump personal health concerns from the Umbra Perspective, too?
Permalink
wayneluke Posted 5:59 am
08 Aug 2007
Talk to these small producers about their farming methods. Go to their farms and check up on things as well. Often times they will be pesticide and herbicide feed but not able to use the organic label due to costs. Their products will often be less expensive than those in local supermarkets or whole foods stores as well. They enable you to get more bang for your buck.
If you're worried about human rights, then look for fairtrade certified items. They are required to be low pesticide or organic items as well as providing a decent wage to the workers. You will find this most often found with things like chocolate, coffee and tea. Other products can be certified fairtrade as well though. It will be more expensive but you're money is feeding families not business profits.
Permalink
Christine Gardner Posted 7:09 am
08 Aug 2007
Permalink
akbeancounter Posted 11:01 am
08 Aug 2007
As for organic products, I personally don't bother. It may be slightly better for your health, but all that processing and shipping doesn't do anything for the environment.
--
Aaron
Permalink
wayneluke Posted 2:44 am
09 Aug 2007
Permalink
wendyoc Posted 3:49 am
09 Aug 2007
I've used a few other enviro-friendly detergents in the past and was frustrated b/c they never seemed to work very well.
Wintree cleaned way better than the other eco-friendly detergents that I've tried and was less-expensive too, which is an added bonus for me!
Permalink
amc89 Posted 4:47 am
09 Aug 2007
Permalink
Merlinever Posted 7:37 pm
12 Aug 2007
Permalink
OsoEco Posted 11:20 am
14 Aug 2007
You must think we're crazy, even I can't believe we only spend that much, but it's true! We're not minimalists, in fact we're obsessed with good food. What lowered our food bills from $600 or even $800(!) a month was cutting out the daily stops to the grocery store on the way home. We'd end up with a pantry full of food, yet would keep shopping b/c a meal ingredient was missing.
Before we put ourselves on a budget, we did something really creative and fun...we challenged ourselves for a month to use up everything in our pantry, fridge and freezer, only buying fresh veggies for that month. Friends loved the idea and would call each night to say "what are you having now?" and I'd update them on our current supply "well, we finished all the pasta and frozen food so we're down to brown rice and veggie broth". Don't get me wrong, some meals were down right boring.
Once we cleaned out/utilized our current food resources, we set a budget of $300 for food each month. How do we reach it? We meal plan, take leftovers to work for lunch and lowered the frequency of purchasing extraneous indulgences we don't need to be eating anyways (ice cream, soda, most snacks).
Instead of buying pints of local ice cream each week, I buy them every other week. It's taught us to slow down and enjoy our food (see http://www.slow food.com) leaving us more satisfied than before.
Good luck, and try to cut other expenses so you and your partner can model healthy living for you child. That's priceless.
Permalink