Wal-Mart has been trying its hardest to distract its environmental critics. In a carefully orchestrated act of diversion, the company shows off its skylights and light bulb sales. In doing so, Wal-Mart has managed to draw attention away from the other, deeper environmental problems lying at the heart of the company's business model.
Wal-Mart's public relations efforts help hide the fact that despite all its talk, the company isn't any greener than it was in 2005 when it laid out a series of company-wide environmental initiatives. The fact remains that Wal-Mart's energy use is still rising. Until the company significantly reduces the amount of energy used to earn a dollar, its sustainability initiatives remain fundamentally flawed. Several aspects of the company's basic business model hinder this kind of comprehensive change:
Land consumption and pollution. With the average Wal-Mart Supercenter the size of a football stadium, and parking lots often three times that size, each Wal-Mart store consumes massive amounts of land and the parking lots contribute to water pollution. Multiply that by over 7,000 Wal-Mart stores worldwide, and plans to build hundreds more every year. Wal-Mart frequently chooses to build new stores rather than renovate old ones, multiplying its impact on local land resources.
Car culture. To shop at Wal-Mart stores, consumers must drive cars. Wal-Mart has contributed to a jump of more than 40 percent in the amount of vehicle-miles American households travel for shopping purposes since 1990. Studies also show that larger stores, such as Wal-Mart, pull customers from a larger geographic area, which results in increased traffic -- a 200,000 square-foot Supercenter, on average, generates over 10,000 car trips during a weekday, and even more on the weekend. Increased traffic results in increased carbon emissions.
Energy consumption. We applaud Wal-Mart's efforts to cut energy use in some stores, but the company has a long way to go. Every few years Wal-Mart opens a few greener stores and hundreds of its traditional, energy-draining stores. While Wal-Mart hopes to make its existing stores 20 percent more efficient by 2013, the energy used by the hundreds of new stores it opens every year will significantly offset any savings and its carbon footprint will only grow larger.
Sourcing. Think Wal-Mart buys local? Think again. The company imports the vast majority of its products from overseas -- at least 70 percent of its merchandise is from China alone. The effect of this phenomenon is multifaceted. The shipping required to get it across the world exponentially raises the carbon footprint of every product sold in a Wal-Mart store. Manufacturing overseas also means fewer environmental regulations at the point of production. Just last month, a Wal-Mart supplier in China was found to be illegally using protected Russian timber, and many Wal-Mart supplier factories have been cited for environment-related workplace violations. Asking domestic suppliers to make efforts to reduce their carbon footprints cannot possibly compensate for Wal-Mart's massive global carbon footprint.
Truck fleet and shipping. Wal-Mart not only relies on oil-consuming ocean tankers to ship its goods, but a veritable army of shipping trucks as well. Wal-Mart currently has 135 distribution centers in 38 states, which translates to approximately 120,000 daily truck trips -- equal to the approximate number of vehicles that use the Lincoln Tunnel on any given day in New York City. A typical Wal-Mart distribution center that makes 900 daily truck trips emits approximately (according to average emissions rates calculated by the U.S. EPA) 2.4 extra tons of particulate matter and 83 extra tons of nitrogen oxides that enter the atmosphere. In 2005, the company set a goal to increase its fleet efficiency by 25 percent in three years, but the company has not indicated any measurable progress toward that goal.
To fundamentally change its environmental policy, Wal-Mart must address each and every one of these areas and work to reduce the company's energy spent to revenue-produced ratio. Until now, the company has consistently ignored these deeper issues and focused instead on cosmetic changes and feel-good fixes. Until the company incorporates measurable reductions in each of these areas, its efforts are nothing more than gestures.
The good news is that Wal-Mart realizes that it can no longer afford to ignore its environmental critics. To push Wal-Mart toward fundamental changes in its environmental policy, it is critical that we continue to put pressure on the retailer as it talks about reform and not be distracted by its public relations campaigns. Declaring victory prematurely will only give Wal-Mart permission to evade its commitments. To help keep pressure on the retailer and make sure it keeps its environmental promises, join Wal-Mart Watch's environmental task force.
Green-biz pioneer Ray Anderson says sustainability literally pays for itself
Umbra’s top ten Climate Week moments
Umbra’s top ten Climate Week moments
Comments
View as Flat
GreyFlcn Posted 10:22 am
05 Feb 2008
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008/02/wal-mart-to-int.h ...
Permalink
kimberleywoelich Posted 12:40 pm
05 Feb 2008
Permalink
starsky Posted 7:09 am
06 Feb 2008
http://sattlerclothing.com/blog/2007/11/05/bill-clinton-t ...
http://www.sattlerclothing.com
Permalink
esekiel Posted 6:13 pm
06 Feb 2008
I know loads and loads of people keep going for the low, low prices, but you'd think they would be losing popularity by now since a lot of people know about how bad Wal-Mart is for our society.
How is there seemingly endless demand for more and more stores?!?!
Permalink
Simplify Posted 12:39 am
07 Feb 2008
Taking a few positive environmental steps (when it is beneficial to the company) while simultaneously causing great environmental devastation does not constitute a green business model.
Here is a recent example that shows just how shallow the company's commitment is to being green: Wal-mart is now trying to expand its operations into India. India is a vast land of small, independent bizarres and markets. Every street is a market. Each day, hawkers bring locally grown organic vegetables to peoples' doorsteps in carts that use no fossil fuel and generate no emissions. They also sell slippers, saris, plastic toys, children's clothes and a host of other consumer goods. This is an integral part of the Indian culture and provides employment to over 100 million people. Wal-mart is trying to put all of these people out of business and replace them with a first world energy intensive retail model. This will increase the carbon emissions from India's retail sector exponentially and destroy the livelihoods of tens of millions of people. Does this sound like a green company to you?
If they started using CFL bulbs in hell in order to free up more energy to do evil, would that make Satan an environmentalist? Would you shop there?
Permalink
javaearth Posted 1:30 am
07 Feb 2008
In the past when I use to go to Walmart, I noticed common themes in each store's consumer base - (regardless of location)
Many Latino's shop at walmart for the "low prices".
Many lower income families shop at Walmart for "low cost" foods.
Many senior citizen shop at Walmart to do their shopping and getting their med's at the "same place and time".
Many over consumers shop at Walmart for the "bulk items and cheap" goods.
Many small towns in America only have Walmart as their main goods provider
So whilst I do not agree with the Walmart ethics. I have found that majority of people really do not care about a companies ethics. Conumsers care more about their ability to over consum at lower rates.
Majority of people do not demand more ethics. Hence Walmart will still expand.
Permalink
earthologist Posted 5:20 am
07 Feb 2008
Cheers to the little guys~
Permalink
nycowboy Posted 1:41 am
08 Feb 2008
There are no, and have not been local stores, that sell the kind of products that Walmart has sold in the greater Albany, NY-area in the past thirty years. Big box stores like Ames, K-Mart, Woolsworths and Sears killed those stores decades ago.
Walmart just reflects a bigger and better version of K-Mart. They sell what K-Mart use to sell at a higher price. K-Mart isn't some wonderful local store either.
My hat's off to Walmart for their work greening up their stores. While they will never be a sustainable industry in the long-run, their practices are better then their competitors like K-Mart and Sears.
Permalink
luannrudolph Posted 7:00 am
08 Feb 2008
With that said, here in Green Bay, Wisconsin Wal-mart has single-handidly caused a land use nightmare. First, Brown County, which is where Green Bay is located, has just over 230,000 people in it. Most live in the Green Bay Metro area. To serve this population, Wal-Mart has put up three stores which are within about a 5 mile radius of each other. To me that is more than enough. But wait, it gets better...Wal-Mart has plans to put in at least 2 more stores if not 3. And even better, one of those stores is located less than 1 mile from one of their existing stores. And even better yet, all of those stores are located on the very fringes of the metro area, which only contributes to the major sprawl issue that we already have here. There is no Wal-Mart downtown where the high levels of poverty exist. If Wal-Mart must exist, shouldn't they be moving into areas where the people that need their "low prices" the most? Instead, they move into suburbia where people who don't have cars can't get to them because the bus system here is more than imperfect.
I would like to say that this is probably an isolated incident, but I am hard pressed to believe that. If Wal-Mart really wants to go green, maybe the should start by looking at their own development policies!
http://greenmadesimple.blogspot.com
Permalink