Bush: all the bailout, none of the social benefits 13

I see that Bush is delightful as always:

Complaining about what it termed partisan "gridlock" in Congress, the White House late Friday called on lawmakers to let U.S. auto makers get quick access to a $25 billion federal loan program, by dropping a requirement that the money be spent on converting to fuel-efficient vehicles.

David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. stevenearlsalmony Posted 6:34 pm
    15 Nov 2008

    Billions in bonuses ................... and bailouts for the "wonder boys" on Wall Street.
    Precisely what have these self-proclaimed Masters of the Universe been doing for billion dollar year-end paydays?
    Yesterday we found out.
    In recent years "the brightest and best" have perfected the rule-making governing the manipulation of 'free' markets and the institutionalization of fraudulent financial instruments and business models.
    What still mystifies me is this: What have these heirs of Ozymandias done in 2008 to merit this self-enrichment?  More manipulation and more fraud for more ill-gotten gains, I suppose.
    Steven Earl Salmony

    AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,

    established 2001

    http://sustaianbilityscience.org/content.html?contentid=1 ...
  2. Sean Casten's avatar

    Sean Casten Posted 11:10 pm
    15 Nov 2008

    T.S. ElliottThe Hollow Men ended with the famous line that the world would "not with a bang, but with a whimper", that seems appropriate for this last bit of flailing Bush nonsense.  But the first stanza may be a more appropriate epitaph for this administration:
    We are the hollow men

    We are the stuffed men

    Leaning together

    Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!

    Our dried voices, when

    We whisper together

    Are quiet and meaningless

    As wind in dry grass

    Or rats' feet over broken glass

    In our dry cellar
    Shape without form, shade without colour,

    Paralysed force, gesture without motion;
    Those who have crossed

    With direct eyes, to death's other Kingdom

    Remember us--if at all--not as lost

    Violent souls, but only

    As the hollow men

    The stuffed men.

  3. ekologkonsult Posted 11:34 pm
    15 Nov 2008

    GamblingThe GM is acting like an addicted gambler.
    Give me more money, I promise they will buy our next gasoline guzzling monster. Just give me one more chance, please.
    And if the US would do this, it would be impossible to complain if Europe felt itself forced to subsidize Airbus
    http://theorchidblog.blogspot.com



    "I have nothing to declare, but my genius." O.Wilde
  4. caniscandida Posted 1:28 am
    16 Nov 2008

    Remorse is Memory awakeOr this, by Emily Dickinson:
    <<

    Remorse -- is Memory -- awake --

    Her Parties all astir --

    A Presence of Departed Acts --

    At window -- and at Door --
    Its Past -- set down before the Soul

    And lighted with a Match --

    Perusal -- to facilitate --

    And help Belief to stretch --
    Remorse is cureless -- the Disease

    Not even God -- can heal --

    For 'tis His institution -- and

    The Adequate of Hell --

    >>

    Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.
  5. Wolverine Posted 1:48 am
    16 Nov 2008

    No Bailout!Period.  Let them die, they more than deserve to.  The auto industry, considering all aspects of it, is one of the most -- if not the most -- environmentally destructive industries on the planet.  Instead of stealing our money and giving it to this totally evil industry, spend it on retraining the workers to participate in building, running, and maintaining a decent public transportation system, which the U.S. sorely lacks.
  6. Bob Wallace Posted 3:24 am
    16 Nov 2008

    Let them die?The auto industry might deserve to die, but can we afford to let them die?
    The spillover of lost jobs both within and without the industry would wreck the upper Midwest.  
    We need to be creating more jobs, not getting rid of more jobs.  It's recession time.  Best to not make it depression time.
    We can't create a new public transportation industry quickly enough to keep money flowing to all the non-auto people in the area.
    I don't think we have any choice but to keep the Big Three running at the time and, perhaps, along with the bailout loans get an agreement to produce more efficient cars.  (But I think the market will  take care of the efficiency thing.)
  7. stevenearlsalmony Posted 5:32 am
    16 Nov 2008

    If we can identify.......................those who are responsible for the economic mess in which we find ourselves, please, pray tell me, why are we paying them billions of dollars now?
  8. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 5:46 am
    16 Nov 2008

    Poor Doing Better than Ever

    One reason the Republicans were defeated is that, like Bush, they represented real social change.   Rich Libs have been hammered by their hedge funds and oil stocks going south.
    Now, the poor are coming on strong with more buying power than ever, thanks to Bush policies:
    Prices May Have Tumbled as Economy Sank: U.S. Economy Preview
    By Bob Willis
    Nov. 16 (Bloomberg) -- The cost of living in the U.S. probably fell in October by the most in almost sixty years, while manufacturing and homebuilding sank deeper into a recession, economists said before reports this week.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a ...

  9. Bob Wallace Posted 7:18 am
    16 Nov 2008

    Right about one thing...Republicans brought about great social change.
    They moved a vast amount of wealth from the middle class to the very wealthy.
    And they failed to regulate the financial markets which allowed the huge derivities market bubble which just burst.
    But those were just a couple of things that got them kicked out.
    Add in lying us into war, fielding an amazing number of corrupt legislators, pissing on the environment, maligning Hispanics, not attending to infrastructure needs, ....
    BTW, don't think you understand economics well enough to realize that prices are falling largely because people can't afford to buy.  It's what happens when we head into a deep recession....
  10. Wolverine Posted 9:20 am
    16 Nov 2008

    Letting The Auto Industry DieBob,
    You obviously don't get the enormity of the lack of public transit in this country.  The plan I suggested would provide far more jobs than the auto industry ever could, and it would be good for the environment instead of bad for it.  As to whether we can afford to let the industry die, that's not an environmental issue.  From an environmental perspective, we can't afford to let it continue.
  11. Sean Casten's avatar

    Sean Casten Posted 9:27 am
    16 Nov 2008

    When all else fails...There's the money hole.
  12. Bob Wallace Posted 10:28 am
    16 Nov 2008

    Public transit...We need both better public transportation systems and more efficient private transportation.
    We don't have time, I fear, to convert Detroit to the production of public transportation at this critical point in time.  We've got a short term crisis which, if we don't fix, could drive our unemployment to levels that would be very hard to tolerate.
    Short term we might have to prop up Detroit as they transition from ICE to hybrid drive for most of their vehicles.  That's doable now.  Detroit has already started the process.
    Large scale public transportation projects are something that we can deal with a little further down the line.  
    Here in California we took a big step earlier in the month to start high speed rail.  But it will be a long time before that project creates a significant number of jobs.
     
  13. sindark's avatar

    sindark Posted 12:52 am
    17 Nov 2008

    Making the best of the bailoutPerhaps the best way this situation can be turned somewhat positive is to mandate tougher efficiency standards for vehicles, as partial public recompense for the funds. The biggest gains can be made in improving the least fuel efficient vehicles. According to calculations posted on Gristmill, improving the fuel efficiency of dire vehicles like the Hummer H3 (15 mpg), Yukon Denali (14 mpg), and Chevy Trailblazer (13 mpg) is a more promising initial strategy than trying to push the efficiency of cars like Honda Civics (29 mpg) upward.
    This strategy is likely to be politically problematic. For one thing, it impinges on the flawed notion that people have a right to drive whatever they want and can afford. For another, the production of highly inefficient, high-margin vehicles is concentrated in North America. Nonetheless, if this is to be a one-off rehabilitation, rather than a temporary reprieve from systemic problems, the North American auto industry needs to shed much of its past philosophy and approach. It is remarkable that no automobile assembled in North America meets China's fuel-efficiency standard. Along with the structural financial problems in the industry, that is a situation that will need to change.

    a sibilant intake of breath

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement