Discovery News tells us that a biofuel crisis is looming. Lester Brown is concerned that two billion (about a third of the way across this window) desperately poor people may soon find their food in our gas tanks:
"I was looking at USDA grain estimates and two numbers jumped out at me," he said. World grain demand is projected to grow by 20 million tons this year. Some 14 million tons of that demand is expected to be for biofuels for cars in the United States. That leaves just six million tons to satisfy the food needs of many countries that import U.S. grain -- at a time when grain stocks are at a 34-year low and climate change and water shortages are making it harder than ever to grow grain.
Unexpectedly, Mat Hartwig, spokesman for the Renewable Fuels Association in Washington, D.C. disagrees:
In the fuel versus food debate it's not an either or situation. We can do both. Even individual kernels of corn can be used in both food and fuel, Hartwig explained. Corn can be processed to extract the sugars for making ethanol, leaving behind a high-protein "distiller's grain" that can then be used for animal feed, he said.
Hold on, my bullshitometer is going nuts. He's trying to convince us that the portion of a corn kernel that goes into your gas tank won't be missed.
But it takes 56 pounds of corn kernels to produce 2.8 gallons of ethanol and 17 pounds of distiller's grain. 56-17=39 pounds of corn lost that cannot feed people (or the cows that people eat). In other words, about 70 percent of a bushel of corn is lost to the food chain when you use it to make ethanol. That is what math is for. So the next time a biofuel profit taker feeds you a similar line of bull, call him on it.
Comments
View as Flat
ffletcher Posted 6:18 am
16 Jul 2006
Therefore, food is more likely to substain market positon in a price war with non-potable etanol.
Permalink
atreyger Posted 8:26 am
16 Jul 2006
It's unfair to compare corn the commodity: shitty, barely-food, with food the food: a nutritious, tasty, yet spoilable product. I am more concerned about the ramped up production of corn as a result of this biofuel development. I believe that American farmers should grow far less corn and begin growing other crops.
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 1:53 pm
16 Jul 2006
Biofuels are driving food prices up. How will the competition for cropland affect the poor? Time will tell. This is just the beginning.
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Help acquire and protect ecological hotspots, give to a conservation organization: http://www.saveourbiodiversity.com
Permalink
ffletcher Posted 3:45 pm
16 Jul 2006
For those people whom the concept of getting packed into a 650 square foot apartment in a city holds little appeal the concept of operating a vegatable farm in rurual america might be attractive. It may even be a theme for a new kind of residential development where people move to these rurual areas, live with other like minded people and grow real vegetables that people can eat which they collectively harvest, process, and get to market.
Crazy idea, probably too romantic to be sound, but it does have a human scale to it that has an appeal. It may be possible to have a four to five month growing season in the North and maybe as long as seven in the South if one plans it right.
Permalink
ffletcher Posted 4:37 pm
16 Jul 2006
Permalink
bookerly Posted 8:20 pm
16 Jul 2006
Dear FFletcher, good luck with your new glasses, my eyes are the same age.
But, really "packed" into a 650 square foot apartment? That would be a huge apartment!! No??
patrick
Permalink
ffletcher Posted 4:39 am
17 Jul 2006
If a person could make the farming thing work there is a potential for a whole new class of residential/agriculture life style development.
Permalink