It's Happening in Ottawa

Grains become fuel at the world’s first cellulosic ethanol demo plant 2

Our plant supplants your plant: a real-life cellulosic ethanol refinery.
Photo: Iogen


Sometimes it seems virtually anything can be made into fuel. As though, if we had the right technology, we could throw together old T-shirts, bumper stickers, and pine cones to make a magical elixir to run the millions of cars on North America's highways.

That's not an entirely far-fetched scenario. The days of filling up our cars on dead dinosaur goo are likely coming to an end. Instead, we'll be using fuel made from plants and plant waste. (Don't hold your breath for the bumper stickers.)

The great white hope in today's biofuels world is cellulosic ethanol, and the one pre-commercial demonstration plant currently producing it lies in the great white north. It's run by Iogen Corporation, a Canadian biotech firm that has been around since the 1970s, manufacturing enzyme products for the pulp and paper, textile, and animal-feed industries.

At its cellulose demonstration plant in Ottawa, Canada, Iogen converts wheat, oat, and barley straw into 3 million liters of ethanol per year (about 793,000 gallons). The plant -- which began operating in 2004 and has drawn investments from Royal Dutch Shell and Goldman Sachs -- was designed to pinpoint any problems with Iogen's processes before construction begins on a commercial-scale plant.

Grist talked shop with Iogen's staff recently to find out what goes on at the plant and when and where the company plans to begin producing on a commercial scale -- then put together this winsome guide to the world's favorite fantasy fuel.

What's the difference between cellulosic ethanol and regular ethanol?
Think of it as the difference between single-grain and multigrain bread. Regular ethanol is made from whole grains like corn or wheat, and this is where cellulosic ethanol has the advantage. It can be made from a much wider range of material -- most often from leftover agricultural and forestry waste, such as cereal straws, corn stalks, sawdust, and paper pulp -- and the feedstocks can be combined.

Most of the regular ethanol sold in the United States is made from corn, but, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, corn can supply only about 10 percent of the country's needs. By contrast, there is enough plant biomass for cellulosic ethanol production in the United States to displace 40 percent of the country's current gasoline consumption.

How does Iogen make cellulosic ethanol?
The wheat, oat, and barley straw is first pretreated. Iogen's patented enzyme -- an active protein made from a fungus -- breaks the cellulose down into sugars, which are then fermented and purified into ethanol. The enzymes are nontoxic and biodegradable.

One of the big side benefits is that the plants used to create cellulosic ethanol contain lignin, a compound that is separated out in the process and can then be burned to create energy. Iogen uses the lignin in a combined heat and power plant that generates the energy needed to run the demonstration facility.

Does it cost more than regular gasoline or regular ethanol?
At the moment, yes, but it's an unfair comparison because cellulosic ethanol hasn't yet been manufactured on an industrial scale. Tax subsidies to the oil industry distort the true cost of gasoline, but when those distortions are removed, cellulosic ethanol is one of the lowest-cost ways to reduce gasoline usage and is cost-competitive with regular ethanol.

The future looks refine from here.

Photo: Iogen

Since the corn-based ethanol industry has been around for years, it is more cost-effective. This is in part due to the $0.55 per gallon tax exemption it receives, an exemption that, although due to expire in 2007, is likely to be renewed.

A June 2006 U.S. Senate hearing was told that the current cost of producing cellulosic ethanol is $2.25 per gallon, which is not competitive when distribution costs are added. The DOE is asking for more research funding, however, and has a target to cut the cost of production in half by 2012.

What are the environmental benefits? Both regular and cellulosic ethanol are clean-burning fuels with a high percentage of oxygen (35 percent). More oxygen encourages a more complete combustion of the fuel, which in turn reduces emissions.

Using life-cycle analysis, which looks at all of the associated costs and benefits, the DOE's Argonne National Laboratories determined that using cellulosic ethanol as both a transportation fuel and as a fuel to generate electricity cuts greenhouse-gas emissions by between 80 and 90 percent. Corn-based ethanol cuts emissions by only 20 to 30 percent.

Can my car run on cellulosic ethanol?
Yes. No modifications need to be made because all standard automobiles manufactured in North America must be made to operate on E10 (a blend of 10 percent ethanol and 90 percent gasoline).

Some car companies make what are known as "flex-fuel" cars that can run on a much higher percentage of ethanol-blended gasoline, as high as 95 percent ethanol to five percent gasoline, and there are currently about 4 million flex-fuel vehicles in the United States. In addition, as hydrogen fuel-cell cars emerge onto the North American market, Iogen says that cellulosic ethanol could be used to produce onboard hydrogen.

Does cellulosic ethanol damage a car's engine?
Just the opposite is true. Vehicles can actually run better because ethanol-blended fuel removes deposits and cleans out fuel lines.

What does Iogen do with the cellulosic ethanol it produces?
As of July 2006, Iogen has been upgrading its research and development plant and, as such, is not currently producing cellulosic ethanol. It has fuel in storage for its own fleet of 13 vehicles, and has supplied cellulosic ethanol to the fleet vehicles of two Canadian government departments in Ottawa (Agriculture Canada and Natural Resources Canada). Iogen also supplied the fuel for the leaders' cars during the G8 summit in Scotland in July 2005 and at the Convention of the Parties (COP11) in Montreal in December 2005.

When can we expect to see the first commercial plant built? Iogen plans to license its technology and expects that its first commercial plant will have the capacity to produce 20 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per year using corn stalks and cereal straws as the feedstock. The company has its eye on three potential sites -- north central Saskatchewan, east central Alberta, and southeast Idaho -- but no decision has yet been made.

So what's the holdup?
Because a cellulosic ethanol bio-refinery involves new and unproven technology, normal project financing is not available without a third-party guarantee, Iogen says. Risk sharing, in the form of government grants and loan guarantees, will be critical to commercialization.

Iogen says that government support is the only missing link; the company says it needs some fairly hefty federal support to share the risk of its first plant. The U.S. government has legislation to support production of cellulosic ethanol; Canada doesn't, but the company believes it could move quickly if the government decided to step in.

Sharon Boddy is a freelance writer living in Ottawa.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Biodiversivist's avatar

    Biodiversivist Posted 5:54 am
    13 Dec 2006

    I hope cellulosic becomes competitiveas soon as possible and crushes its competition--ethanol made from cane sugar grown on razed rain forests and corn grown as we grow it today--thus ending the accelerating environmental destruction taking place in the meantime.
    Although apparently highly effective, the argument being put forth by power brokers that you must accept environmentally destructive means of producing ethanol in order to get to cellulosic, is pure bullshit. To ice the cake, if cellulosic fails to compete, then what?
    In general, it would be nice if cellulosic ethanol didn't have to compete against subsidized crops as people make choices about what to plant.
    Even he is worried about government crop subsidies that could keep cellulosic from being competitive. It is unlikely they will disappear just when he is ready to start producing.
    My hunch is that it will generally be cheaper to retrofit a corn ethanol plant than to build a new one from a greenfield site.
    A hunch is one notch up from a guess. As an engineer who has been around a while, I know how complicated retrofits can get. Tearing down a factory (or a house for a remodel) often costs less than retrofitting it. Location is also a big factor. Refineries now are located to take advantage of corn crops, corn storage facilities, and railroad lines. Unless our farmers are going to start growing switch grass instead of corn in their fields, then these refineries are not optimally located. On the other hand, if Midwest farmers do plant grass instead of corn because it is more profitable, well, I guess we can all learn to eat grass. It is a moot argument in any case. We don't need to build refineries unless or until cellulosic technology gets cost competitive. We can build them then.
    We need to do more to develop new crops and cropping systems.
    The above statement should be a big hint to all of us. Not only is the chemistry not there yet, but he seems quite concerned about the other problems as well. Like, what are we going to grow, where will we grow it, and how do you transport bulky sources of cellulose?
  2. billyx2 Posted 5:27 pm
    25 Dec 2007

    IogenHello all,

    This is my first posting. Any idea when Iogen, based in Ottawa, will go public? I'm expecting it some time in 2008.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Series Intro
A Grist special series on biofuels 28
How the world got addicted to oil, and where biofuels will take us 28
A lighthearted look at biofuels through time 28
The numbers behind ethanol, cellulosic ethanol, and biodiesel in the U.S. 28
All the resources you need to hop on the biofuels bandwagon 5
Find out which cars can run on ethanol and biodiesel 13
A look at the impacts of biofuels production, in the U.S. and the world 13
The what, where, and why of E85 ethanol 5
How cash and corporate pressure pushed ethanol to the fore 5
Using grease and other goodies, small biodiesel producers are making a big difference 3
An interview with Seattle biodiesel distributor Dan Freeman 3
Richard Branson chats about embracing ethanol and slashing airplane emissions 6
A handy biofuels glossary, and videos to boot 5
An interview with David Pimentel 18
Three perspectives on the biofuels debate 18
Silicon Valley investor Vinod Khosla chats about the promise of ethanol 12
To fulfill its environmental promises, biofuel policy needs a kick in the pants 18
Toward a community-owned, decentralized biofuel future 18
An interview with Greasecar founder Justin Carven 12
An environmental-justice advocate responds to the biofuels boom 12
Not quite, but cellulosic ethanol may be coming sooner than you think 12
Grains become fuel at the world's first cellulosic ethanol demo plant 2
Biofuel pioneer Lee Lynd points the way toward a "carbohydrate economy" 2
An interview with Missouri farmer and ethanol co-op member Brian Miles 3
Check out the latest entries in the celeb-biofuels biz 3
It's time for a real "food vs. fuel" debate 3
As its neighbors back biofuels, Central America gears up for business 0
A biodiesel entrepreneur in Argentina spreads seeds of wisdom 5
What Brazil can teach the U.S. about energy and ethanol 5
The strangest biofuel sources you've never heard of 5
The top 10 reasons to give a hoot about biofuels 6
How a grassroots biodiesel group can show the way for others 6
An interview with Mary Beth Stanek, General Motors energy director 6
What we've learned from the biofuels series 6
Advertisement