Dear Umbra,
Do you recommend building straw bale homes? And/or can you insulate an existing home with straw bales on the outside of the home and then finish it using siding, wood, or stucco? I wonder why this renewable, economical, and easily available resource is underused and undervalued ... am I missing something? What do you think?
Leni E.
Hollywood, Fla.
Dearest Leni,
Anyone who has seen a straw-bale home will not be making any of the traditional jokes about the Three Little Pigs. The plastered walls are filled with solid bales of straw at least 14 inches wide, and the houses sit heavily, though beautifully, on the landscape. They are not going to blow down with a simple huff and puff.
Not just for pigs anymore.
I have several happy friends with straw-bale homes, so I'm biased in favor of this system. Straw bale seems not only ecologically sound and cheaper than traditional construction, but fun to build (if you, like me, love plastering). So yes, I'm in favor of straw bale, but I'm no expert. If you are considering building with straw bale, it's vital to find local knowledge, first as to whether your climate would be a good choice for straw bale, and second to confirm local building codes. Modern straw-bale construction is not yet covered by most building codes.
There are two general ways to build a straw-bale home. One is to build a fairly typical post and beam frame, but instead of then adding studs, insulation, and sheetrock, one piles straw bales between the timbers. The wood holds up the roof, the straw fills the wall. In load-bearing straw bale, the bales themselves hold up the roof. In both cases, the bales are plastered inside and out with any of various plasters, ranging from local earth to Portland cement.
Straw is a cheap, renewable agricultural waste product -- leftover stalks from grains and seeds such as wheat or rice -- that has been used in building construction for centuries. Just to mention a few straw-y considerations, bales used in construction should be dry, sterile, and densely packed, and design of the house should keep water off the walls. The roof should have a long overhang, bottom bales should be a certain distance from the ground, and all exterior finish work should be watertight. If the house is well designed, moisture within the walls won't become a problem.
Dense straw is a good insulator, with an R value around 2.4 per inch -- putting an 18-inch-wide bale in the R-40s (fiberglass batts of insulation generally range from the teens through 30s). It also has high thermal mass, meaning it is slow to release and absorb heat, keeps buildings at a lovely consistent temperature, and is a good choice for passive solar homes.
I did find a little information on retrofitting an existing home with straw bales. It sounds complicated. The exterior walls will basically become at least 14 inches fatter, which means extending the roofline or building a new roof, maybe extending the foundation, dealing with how doors will open, building new window openings, negotiating the boundary between old and new walls, and other considerations. Basically, you can do it, but it may not be the most economical or even commonsensical approach to insulating your home.
In sum: Yay for straw. The internet is filled with informative, enthusiastic straw experts (one is The Last Straw). Go unto them, find a local group, and get any further questions more than answered.
Balefully,
Umbra
Comments
View as Flat
PermieWriter Posted 4:58 am
22 Oct 2008
Permalink
RichardinKRV Posted 5:23 am
22 Oct 2008
California has a straw bale building code.
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
SECTION 18944.30-18944.34
Guidelines for Straw Bale Structures
http://www.strawbuilding.org/tech/code/cahnscode.html
Permalink
sje333 Posted 5:53 am
22 Oct 2008
Permalink
Delay And Deny Posted 7:31 am
22 Oct 2008
I've seen central washington land advertised for $29,000 for 40 acres!
http://www.liveatgrandview.com/
A straw house would be exactly right for me to homestead there and get away from light rail loving libs in seattle.
Permalink
sustainablejohn Posted 10:37 am
22 Oct 2008
Permalink
PermieWriter Posted 4:08 pm
22 Oct 2008
Permalink
redambrosia99 Posted 2:04 am
23 Oct 2008
Anyway, in order to get their house approved by the building code folks they had to jump through all kinds of hoops. At first they wouldn't let them build it. But they were persistent and eventually they got to talk with the director and he approved it.
The point being, building codes are only a problem if you let them be. If you're polite and persistent, and share your excitement over your unusual house, you may just change the building codes.
Permalink
BlackBear Posted 2:14 am
23 Oct 2008
Permalink
slsessions Posted 3:30 am
23 Oct 2008
Permalink
jtellerelsberg Posted 9:26 am
23 Oct 2008
Though I am also a big fan of straw bale construction [and a conflict of interest alert: I work for Chelsea Green Publishing, publishers of books on straw bale construction (among other topics)], I'd hesitate to refer to straw merely as a "waste" product. Failure to return at least some decent quantity of straw to the soil from whence it grew would result in reduced organic matter and poorer soils--and so force growers to rely more heavily on artificial fertilizers and irrigation. At the current rate of straw bale construction I'm sure it's not an issue, but if there were a large increase in the number of straw bale buildings, we could face a serious trade-off issue between "eco" buildings and healthy soils.
Permalink
fuentesdesign Posted 4:25 am
25 Oct 2008
http://www.dcat.net/about_dcat/current/ASTM_E119.pdf
and more on our website on codes
http://www.fuentesdesign.com/buildings/projects/why_straw ...
Permalink