In the last 20 years, the United States has essentially dismantled its industrial base, moving production of consumer goods south to Mexico and east to Asia.
This has not only dramatically lowered the cost of goods, fueling a consumer boom; it has also helped make our economy less energy-intensive, and lowered our exposure to industrial waste.
But net gains for the environment and worker health have been imaginary. We've merely shifted the burdens of industrial production onto other lands and other people -- most recently, China.
I think this is the most important political-ecological story of our time -- made even more urgent by the specter of climate change (since for the climate, greenhouse-gas emissions from Huizhou, China, are just as damaging as those from Pittsburgh, Penn.). And I don't know of any other publication covering it with more rigor than the Wall Street Journal.
It has been running great articles on how U.S. demand for cheap goods is triggering a surge in consumption of Chinese coal. And on Tuesday, it ran a great piece on how U.S. industry responded to the well-documented hazards of cadmium-battery manufacturing by simply moving production to China, creating a nightmare for workers there.
Here is the Journal:
Once widely manufactured in the West, [cadmium] batteries are now largely made in China, where the industry is sickening workers and poisoning the soil and water.
Europe has banned most cadmium batteries. Not so the U.S., where they're "still widely used in toys, power tools, cordless phones and other gadgets." The article is worth reading in its entirety.
Chuck Norris on Copenhagen
‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science
Obama administration may (finally) offer greenhouse-gas targets
Comments
View as Flat
Jon Rynn Posted 3:22 am
16 Jan 2008
And I also remember you mentioning that you hadn't quite decided what to think about the relocalization debate on Grist -- any more thoughts?
Permalink
Tom Philpott Posted 4:03 am
16 Jan 2008
Victual Reality
Permalink
Jon Rynn Posted 4:14 am
16 Jan 2008
Permalink
Tom Philpott Posted 11:57 pm
16 Jan 2008
From today's NYT, "Blue-Collar Jobs Disappear, Taking Families' Way of Life Along," by Erik Eckholm:
Slammed by the continued decline in the automobile and steel businesses, Ohio never recovered from the recession of 2001-2, and blue-collar families who had made it partway up the economic ladder find themselves slipping back, with chaotic effects on families and dreams.
Throughout the state, the percentage of families living below the poverty line -- just over $20,000 for a family of four last year -- rose slightly from 14 percent in 2005 to 16 percent in 2007, one study found. But equally striking is the rise in younger working families struggling above that line. The numbers are more dismal in the southeastern Appalachian part of the state, where 32 percent of families lived below the poverty line in 2007, according to the study, and 56 percent lived with incomes less than $40,000 for a family of four.
...
One consequence is an upending of the traditional pattern, in which middle-aged children take in an elderly parent. As $15-an-hour factory jobs are replaced by $7- or $8-an-hour retail jobs, more men in their 30s and 40s are moving in with their parents or grandparents, said Cheryl Thiessen, the director of Jackson/Vinton Community Action, which runs medical, fuel and other aid programs in Jackson and Vinton Counties.
...
"A lot of major employers have left, and the town is drying up," Ms. Thiessen said of Jackson. "We're starting to lose small shops, too -- Hallmark, the jewelry and shoe stores, the movie theater and most of the grocery stores."
Shari Joos, 45, a married mother of four boys in nearby Wellston, said, "If you don't work at Wal-Mart, the only job you can get around here is in fast food."
Between her husband's factory job and her intermittent work, they made $30,000 a year in the best of times, Mrs. Joos said. Since last fall, when her husband was laid off by the Merillat cabinet factory, which downsized to one shift a day from three, keeping anywhere near that income required Mrs. Joos to take a second job. She works at a school cafeteria each weekday from 9:30 a.m. to 1 p.m and then drives to Wal-Mart, where she relaxes in her car before starting her 2-to-10 p.m. shift at the deli counter.
Victual Reality
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 12:33 am
17 Jan 2008
Make them here and force other nations to compete. Like what happened with CFLs.
If the US market for incandescent light bulbs dissappears, China will switch to CFLs, shuttering their incandescent bulb plants. Forcing them to actually use CFLs domestically.
They have a dynamite plugin hybrid to feature during the Olympics. What is missing in that picture is that no plugin hybrids were ever manufactured here. The invention was ignored here and went straight to China for mass production.
Relocalization in the sphere of renewable transportation would best be facilitated by conversion of used vehicles with locals feeding off the old technology. Recycling electric motors and used vehicles..into plugin hybrids.
That will get the attention of larger businesses. Change from the top down, originating in the corporate boardroom and congressional gym, where lobbyists meet legislators, is not happening.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
Jon Rynn Posted 12:53 am
17 Jan 2008
The problem, I suppose, is that such a program would have to involve 1) some sort of change in trade policies -- at the very least, fair trade for environmental and labor standards, and 2) some kind of real industrial policy, a la Japan or Korea (or even China), and those go too far against the reigning ideologies. Even Edwards jets around to all the Davos-type meetings around the world, so he can't see out of the conventional wisdom either.
The decline of manufacturing has been going on for decades, but accelerated when the Carter/Reagan interest rate boosts made the dollar much more expensive, almost killing export industries. Since then, the development of container cargo and communications, and the opening up of China, has led to the slow bleed that we see most poignantly in Ohio -- and Michigan as well, on which see Jeffrey ST. Clair's piece here
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 1:26 am
17 Jan 2008
Even if they eventually try to play catchup, they will simply have the parts made in China and mexico, and the cars assembled in the south. Eliminating any reliability from their products.
Bought a chinese made, mexican assembled appliance lately? Did it keep running past the three month waranty date? You were lucky then.
Good luck driving the product of US automakers from the same outsourced mode.
Get ready for a really GREAT depression. No one can turn this around, except american consumers. And we are all losing our jobs. Sorry, it's too late. The bushwackin' worked. Voting for a shaved chimp once was bad enough, but twice?
The shame everyone who voted for bush ought to feel. Where is it? Why do you all hate our country, our freedom, and our troops?
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
Jon Rynn Posted 1:37 am
17 Jan 2008
I'm afraid I agree that we could be heading toward a depression, or what may be worse, because of the decline of manufacturing, a permanent decline in the standard of living, a latinamericanization of the US, in the late Richard Barnet's phrase, that is, a highly skewed income distribution, big farms and resource extraction industries, a lower-middle class (by world standards) standard of living, unless we turn around the manufacturing sector. There are still a lot of highly-trained workers in Michigan, it would be a good place to start.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 1:51 am
17 Jan 2008
All those british comedies about their decline. That's where we are headed. But at least they have pensions and the dole.
None of that left here in a few years. Latinamericanization maybe closer to the result.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink
Jon Rynn Posted 2:13 am
17 Jan 2008
But UK's decline was fairly slow and steady -- I just hope the US doesn't go in one big crunch, it could get very ugly, politically and economically.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:32 pm
17 Jan 2008
It's the hobo way. Woody Guthrie would be proud.
We'll always have tourism, like the UK, if we can preserve our natural wonders. Other than that we can just make everything we need right here. It'll be like Siberia, but warmer.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog
Permalink