For at least 170 years, Isle de Jean Charles—a narrow ridge of land lying between Bayou Terrebonne and Bayou Pointe-aux-Chene in southeastern Louisiana’s Terrebonne Parish—has been home to members of the Biloxi-Chitimacha tribe, native people related to the Choctaw and part of a larger confederation of Muskogees.
But the tribe’s history is about to take a dramatic turn due to climate change.
Albert
Naquin, chief of the Isle de Jean Charles Band of Biloxi-Chitimacha,
recently announced that the group plans to leave its ancestral island
homeland and build a new community behind levees on higher ground. He told the Associated Press the decision came because the community was flooded five times in the
past six years. About 25 families now live on the island, a number
that’s fallen in recent years due to the constant flooding associated
with global warming.
The state-recognized tribe hopes to use
about $12 million in federal aid to build 60 homes in Bourg, a
community about 10 miles inland, according to the AP. Officials with
Terrebonne Parish and the state of Louisiana still have to approve the
relocation plan.
The plight of the Biloxi-Chitimacha people of
Isle de Jean Charles illustrates the suffering already being
experienced worldwide due to climate disruption.
A recent report funded by the United Nations and the World Bank titled “In Search of Shelter: Mapping the Effects of Climate Change on Human Migration and Displacement” warned that there could be as many as 250 million people displaced by
2050 unless “aggressive measures” were taken to halt global warming.
In
fact, as the report pointed out, climate-related displacement is
already underway. Environmental change is part of the complex mix of
factors behind the world’s biggest internal displacement problem in
Sudan, where 4.9 million people have fled their homes. In low-lying
Bangladesh, more than 5 million people live in areas vulnerable to
cyclones and storm surges, and growing numbers are already coping with
the danger through temporary migration to urban areas. And in the
Mekong Delta of Southeast Asia, farmers are being driven off their land
by intensified flooding.
Small island states are especially
vulnerable to sea-level rise. This past spring marked the beginning of
what’s believed to be the world’s first evacuation of an entire people
as a result of global warming, with the first of the 2,600 people of the Carteret Islands leaving their vanishing coral atoll for the nearby island of Bougainville, part of Papua New Guinea.
The Solomon Times reported that on April 29, 2009, the fathers of the first five Carteret Island
families relocated to land donated by the Catholic Church, “bringing
their sons to support them in the work leading up to the time when
their wives and children will eventually join them.”
A matter of time before communities no longer exist
Land loss has long been a problem facing Louisiana, which has seen 1,900 square miles of land vanish since the 1930s and which continues to lose as many as 40 square miles each year to the
Gulf of Mexico. With every bit of land swallowed by the sea, the loss
rate speeds up, since the coastal wetlands and barrier islands act as
storm buffers. If action is not taken to slow the current loss rate,
the Louisiana shoreline is expected to move inland as much as 33 miles
by the year 2040.
Factors behind Louisiana’s escalating loss of
coastal land include natural subsidence as well as the construction of
flood-protection levees, which block the natural deposition of
land-building sediment. Meanwhile, the dredging of access canals by the
state’s offshore oil industry lets in salt water that in turn kills
marsh vegetation, further worsening erosion. At the same time, human-made
global warming is increasing sea levels through thermal expansion of
water and melting continental ice sheets.
A federal government report released earlier this year examining regional impacts of climate change noted that coastal inundation would increase as sea levels rise—which it called “one of the most certain and most costly consequences of a warming climate.”
The
cost of shoring up Louisiana’s coastline to better withstand storms
would be considerable. In 2002, the Committee on the Future of Coastal
Louisiana estimated that a comprehensive program to restore the state’s
coastal wetlands to a sustainable level would cost $14 billion—and
that calculation was done before hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which
together wiped out 217 square miles of coastal land in 2005. But of
course, that cost has to be weighed against the cost of displacement
and destruction in the state’s coastal parishes, which are home to more than 2 million people—47 percent of the state’s population.
Katrina
and Rita were especially hard on the Biloxi-Chitimacha of Isle de Jean
Charles, with the community’s one church relocated after Rita and its
fire station since closed. Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in 2008 also dealt
devastating blows to the community.
The tribe had hoped to get some protection from the Army Corps of Engineers’ $900 million Morganza to the Gulf of Mexico Hurricane Protection Project—a controversial plan known by its environmentalist critics as the “Great Wall of Louisiana.” The project was designed to protect communities in Terrebonne and
neighboring Lafourche parishes from coastal erosion, but the final
design for the project did not include Isle de Jean Charles because the
agencies involved decided the costs involved outweighed the benefits of
protecting so few families.
Naquin reportedly considered suing the federal government for excluding his community from the levee plans but worried about how
that would impact his tribe’s pending application for federal
recognition.
Meanwhile, the Biloxi-Chitimacha are not the only
indigenous people of Louisiana to face the loss of their ancestral
homelands to rising seas. In the 2007 Institute for Southern Studies
report “Blueprint for Gulf Renewal,” Chief Brenda Dardar-Robichaux of Louisiana’s United Houma Nation
described attending a conference on coastal land loss and watching a
researcher draw a line across a map of the state showing the area most
at risk of being submerged—which included most of the Houma lands,
some of which are already being lost to floods.
“It’s just a
matter of time before some of our communities no longer exist,”
Dardar-Robichaux said at the time. And as Houma historian Michael T.
Mayheart Dardar has noted, “If settlements are abandoned and
populations allowed to disperse, with them goes the cultural integrity
of our people.”
Though it’s rarely noted in most media coverage
of human-made climate disruption, the displacement of entire peoples due
to a warming climate and rising seas has implications under human
rights agreements such as the United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, a set of U.S.-endorsed standards that govern the treatment of people
uprooted by natural and human-made disasters. As Guiding Principle 9 says:
States are under a particular obligation to protect against the displacement of indigenous peoples, minorities, peasants, pastoralists and other groups with a special dependency on and attachment to their lands.
The situation facing the Biloxi-Chitimacha of Isle de Jean Charles raises the question: Is the United States really doing all it can to protect against climate-related displacement? It’s something leaders need to think about as they craft federal climate legislation and prepare for the International Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen this December.
(This story originally appeared at Facing South.)
Comments
View as Flat
Live Climate Posted 4:51 pm
07 Oct 2009
Permalink
Tasermons Partner Posted 8:25 pm
07 Oct 2009
In this particular instance, nearly all the blame is probably on destruction of wetland habitat/swampland and subsidence. In Louisiana, this is due to oil and gas drilling, levee systems and dikes that divert river and bayou sediments, and the clearing of areas to make way for boat - passable waterways and shipping areas.
Still caused by humans, just not global warming as the main culprit.
Permalink
Clifford Wells Posted 8:27 pm
07 Oct 2009
So that's out, climate change didn't do a darn thing to those Indians. Subsidence, erosion, and the sheer stupidity of the US Army Corps of Engineers are largely to blame. Let's be fair, the Corps is much better these cays than way back when.
If you want to talk about the effect of climate change, I can BS with you, but best to talk with a real native American Indian. The animals seem to move differently, the birds, the fish, and the critters. Migrations seem confused. And even the common grasses and shrubs seems to be growing differently, with invasive plants coming in.
Well I don't know because I haven't talked to a real Indian in about 4 years. But that's what I think would might hear. Some of my biologist friends and naturalists are watching it. Climate change is happening ... just not how you think it is.
Permalink
HaraBara Posted 10:16 pm
07 Oct 2009
Permalink
Sue Sturgis Posted 1:48 pm
08 Oct 2009
Permalink
heathersr Posted 2:31 pm
09 Oct 2009
Permalink