I'm sitting here at the venue for tomorrow afternoon's event: the Wadsworth Theater. It is ... large. I think around 1500 people are going to be sitting in here tomorrow, judging me for the poor quality of my shoes and my neglected fitness regime.
I hear from the organizers that press attention has gotten nuts. There will be many dozens of press folk in the press tent tomorrow, from lots of national media outlets.
If you watched the debate last night, you'll have a sense of exactly what we want our event not to be. Wolf Blitzer asked a cavalcade of inane, gimmicky questions designed to ... oh hell, what Matt said here.
Tomorrow, we'll be talking about substantive questions of politics and policy. We'll see how the media reacts.
Don't forget to watch the live webcast!
Comments
View as Flat
sunflower Posted 9:55 am
16 Nov 2007
Permalink
sunflower Posted 10:11 am
16 Nov 2007
Permalink
goofy gore Posted 9:45 pm
16 Nov 2007
Permalink
divineorder Posted 10:45 am
17 Nov 2007
What great work! Please pass it on.
Thanks for you blog.
PS commenter Goofy Gore must be off meds again...or drunk
Permalink
Marky48 Posted 2:14 pm
17 Nov 2007
Marky48
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 5:29 pm
17 Nov 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/opinion/18pubed.html?_r ...
He notes that the Times has up in its website the videos of all the debates, and/or transcripts. Will the Grist debate receive equal consideration?
Our interpretation of the Grist debate will partly depend on what we think of its less than total attendance. Does it matter that not all the candidates were present? If so, how much?
Also, Hoyt mentions that in most media, including the Times, it is the front runners who receive almost all the coverage, to the great frustration of many readers. One editor, for whose opinion on this he asked, said that Yes, on the one hand, the pro-front-runner-coverage bias is unfortunately firmly in place; on the other hand, the newspapers have to acquaint readers with reality, and help them understand that some candidates are much more likely to be elected than others.
Hoyt seems to think that the Times has been remiss in not giving as much front-page coverage to Edwards as it has to Clinton and Obama; and that the next bunch, presumably Biden, Dodd and Richardson, deserve more attention than they have received. But by implication, he apparently does not mind that Gravel and Kucinich are basically cut dead, as though it would be irresponsible for a serious newspaper to waste any of its space and the reader's time on them.
That is a great pity, especially since Dennis Kucinich is one of the most principled, enlightened and articulate public servants that we have. I am glad that he chose to participate in the Grist debate.
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
goofy gore Posted 11:54 pm
17 Nov 2007
Permalink
linkunlovr Posted 6:09 am
18 Nov 2007
They can't ridicule his views so they ridicule his looks! Last time that happened we got Lincoln. Not so bad.
Permalink