The Rocky Mountain Institute's Amory Lovins appeared on PBS's Charlie Rose Show on Tuesday. He was, as usual, brilliant and absurdly quotable. The guy's a human pull-quote generator. Charlie Rose is kind of dippy though. Here's the full video:
Amory Lovins on Charlie Rose
Damn he’s smart 12
Read More About
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
jjwfmme Posted 5:27 am
01 Dec 2006
Permalink
sunflower Posted 5:43 am
01 Dec 2006
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 3:08 am
02 Dec 2006
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Help acquire and protect ecological hotspots, give to a conservation organization: http://www.saveourbiodiversity.com
Permalink
jscorse Posted 11:29 am
02 Dec 2006
//
var l=new Array();
var output = '';
l[0]='>';l[1]='a';l[2]='/';l[3]='';l[26]='\"';l[27]=' 117';l[28]=' 100';l[29]=' 101';l[30]=' 46';l[31]=' 115';l[32]=' 105';l[33]=' 105';l[34]=' 109';l[35]=' 64';l[36]=' 101';l[37]=' 115';l[38]=' 114';l[39]=' 111';l[40]=' 99';l[41]=' 115';l[42]=' 46';l[43]=' 110';l[44]=' 111';l[45]=' 115';l[46]=' 97';l[47]=' 106';l[48]=':';l[49]='o';l[50]='t';l[51]='l';l[52]='i';l[53]='a';l[54]='m';l[55]='\"';l[56]='=';l[57]='f';l[58]='e';l[59]='r';l[60]='h';l[61]='a ';l[62]='
Permalink
jhutson Posted 2:31 pm
02 Dec 2006
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 5:23 am
03 Dec 2006
Sunflower, I also am stumped by "global weirding." That is what is printed in the transcript, in quotation marks, so presumably that is what Amory Lovins actually said. Or, that is what the transcriber thought he said. And I am not sure the context makes the meaning clear. Perhaps Jason will remember to ask him about it, when he sees him on Thursday.
Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!
Permalink
Jones Posted 5:51 am
03 Dec 2006
"Global Warming" is so 1998. Get into the 21st century.
Permalink
jscorse Posted 6:11 am
03 Dec 2006
J.S.
htt://voicesofreason.info
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 7:12 am
03 Dec 2006
Actually, I did indeed suspect that "global weirding" had to do with anomalous and extreme weather patterns, over against the simpler idea of temperatures everywhere in every circumstance rising.
Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 7:52 am
03 Dec 2006
But journalism contains many genres. There are many ways to conduct an interview, and those various styles get different results, and all of those results can be useful. Tim Rennert, Jim Lehrer, George Stephanopoulos, Wolf Blitzer, Mike Wallace, Geraldo Rivera, Oprah Winfrey, and everybody in the White House press corps, just to name some examples, all have unique and personal ways of asking questions and eliciting responses. Is it fair to make oneself a Procrustes of journalism, and force them all to fit the same quantifiable standard of acceptability?
Charlie Rose obviously is well-loved. The PBS folks have been running him for many years now, no?, which must count for something. While he was ill and hospitalized and off the show this past year, a great number of fans showed their support for him, and a number of guest hosts gladly stepped in.
Rose should not be underestimated. In this respect at least he is like George W. Bush: it is easy to underestimate his intelligence. (Yes, I think that W. is in some ways clever and adroit. That is not meant as a compliment, because however far his cleverness goes, it is not accompanied by intellectual curiosity, or by moral wisdom.) In fact, for Rose to do his job well, as for any interviewer, he needs to prepare with a good deal of research, and a lot of reading. And I believe he has done his job well for many years.
Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!
Permalink
sunflower Posted 8:12 am
03 Dec 2006
I would also like to hear his response concerning this global phenomenon and his use of his new term.
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 4:20 am
29 Jun 2008
I'd vote for that.
Compare and contrast to the Cheney secret energy meeting, that is still held as a state secret.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005 ...
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink