ACES and eights: dead planet's hand

American Clean Energy Security Act strengthens U.S. ability to sabotage international climate talks 1

The world is not going to turn its back on coal.
U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu

The Waxman-Markey American Clean Energy Security Act (ACES) won’t cut emissions. It won’t serve as a platform we can improve later anymore than the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) served as a foot in the door to improve our democracy when it promoted voter purges and Diebold electronic voting machines. But one last argument is left to supporters: we need to support ACES in order to improve America’s negotiating position in Copenhagen.

This bill would improve the U.S. negotiating position, since our international  friends and allies tend to grade us on a special needs curve.  The problem is that our government would use this increased leverage to weaken rather than strengthen any climate deal.  The current U.S. position is to support more coal, and oppose  strong emissions reductions in the next ten years.  The U.S. helped weaken the last climate change treaty by pushing  to include carbon trading and offsets in Kyoto. Does it really make sense for environmentalists to support a bill that won’t reduce emissions, that does not provide an infrastructure for future emissions reduction in order to let our government do the same thing a second time?


References

Gar Lipow; “Waxman-Markey bill would do more for climate without cap-and-trade provision - Should be called Jekyll-Hyde”;; Grist Magazine; 21-May-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/AcesNoC-T>

Gar Lipow; “Offsets are still counterfeit carbon credits - Clapping louder”; Grist Magazine; 1-Jun-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/OffFalse>

Gar Lipow; “Pissing the earth away”; Grist Magazine; 9-Jun-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/GristPiss>

Gar Lipow; “American Climate Energy Security bill still makes things worse. ACES is not playing with a full deck.”; Grist Magazine; 3-Jul-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/AcesNoDeck>

George Monbiot; “Why do we allow the US to act like a failed state on climate change? The Waxman-Markey climate bill is the best we will get from America until the corruption of public life is addressed.”; The Guardian - Environment - George Monbiot’s Blog; 26-Jun-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/GradeCurve>

West Coast Climate Equity;“Steven Chu Backpedals on Coal-fired Power”; West Coast Climate Equity Global Climate Change Information; 14-Jan-2009;  <http://tinyurl.com/ChuCoal>   

Siobhan Hughes; “Energy Secretary Backs Clean-Coal Investment”;  Wall Street Journal;  7-Apr-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/wsjChuCoal

Jeff Biggers;“Coalfield residents respond to Obama’s announcement on mountaintop removal - Kinder, Gentler Blasting, Leveling of Mountains, Filling of Streams”; Grist Magazine; 11-Jun-2009;  <http://tinyurl.com/kindMTR>

Mark Stevenson;“US nixes 40 percent cuts at climate change talks”; The Associated Press; 23-Jun-2009; <http://tinyurl.com/NoGHGcuts>

Gar Lipow, a long time environmental activist and journalist with a strong technical background has spent years immersed in the subject of efficiency and renewable energy. He has written extensively on the economics of solving the global warming, and why pricing externalities (though important) cannot be the main driver of such solutions.

His on-line reference book compiling information on technology available today, “No Hair Shirt Solutions to Global Warming”, is available at http://www.nohairshirts.com.

His articles on the economics and politics of solving the climate crisis have been published in Z magazine and a number of small journals.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. LaurieWilliams Posted 1:51 pm
    26 Sep 2009

    Please consider our 10-min YouTube video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLHCvYj0kzk&feature=related
    (The Huge Mistake - Climate Change Solutions 2009). Based on more than 20 years each as public-sector environmental enforcement attorneys, my husband and I explain the flaws of the climate legislation currently being considered by Congress and why it would lock in climate degradation. We also explain the alternative. There is a real, effective and affordable solution to climate change, just no powerful monied interests to push for it. Find out how you can make a difference.
    Thank you for your consideration.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement