Photo: World Resources Institute
Al Gore's Alliance for Climate Protection plans to spend more than $300 million over the next three years on a marketing campaign aimed at getting Americans to address climate change. With ads developed by the Martin Agency (the folks behind the Geico cavemen and chatty gecko) and partnerships with grassroots groups, the campaign focus will be on the how-to aspect of cutting greenhouse gases. "Right now, we have incredible numbers of people in the U.S. who say global warming is an important problem that needs to be fixed," says the Martin Agency's Mike Hughes. "But most people think there's nothing they can do about it -- or that someone should do something about it, but that someone isn't them." Yep, that sounds like most of the people we know. The alliance also hopes to persuade consumer-product manufacturers to use packaging and advertising to "amplify the message" about curbing global warming. Says Alliance CEO Cathy Zoi, "We have to mainstream this. It has to become easy and normal."
source: USA Today, Plenty Magazine
Obama headed to Copenhagen, sets the bar for success
‘Copenhagen Diagnosis’ offers a grim update to the IPCC’s climate science
Comments
View as Flat
Tasermons Partner Posted 5:08 am
24 Mar 2008
Permalink
kaibosworth Posted 12:16 pm
24 Mar 2008
In an open ended gallup poll this month asking Americans what the most important problem facing our country was, none responded with global warming, and only 2 percent said energy and 1 percent environment/pollution. Where are the "incredible numbers" that Al Gore speaks of?
Any marketing campaign that focuses on the minor solutions to global warming will ultimately fail, especially when many of Gore's solutions are going to cost us. Global warming is inextricably linked to many of the issues that Americans care about (economy, jobs, oil, the war, etc.), but it's not being framed that way. And needless to say, Gore's little demand-side solutions are NOT going to reduce America's carbon emissions significantly, especially if they're using packaging (let me guess - plastic) and commercials. Furthermore, it will not create the positive atmosphere for the massive investment and social and policy shifts we need to build a climate positive America.
For all that Gore has done for the climate movement, it's time for him to take a back seat and give up the hopeless, elitist, survivalist mantra he's been sporting lately. It's time for a different environmentalism - holistic, practical, economic, sustainable, and just.
Permalink
Syjel Posted 12:44 pm
24 Mar 2008
There exists scads of polling data showing that the vast majority of Americans are concerned about climate change and want the government to do something about it. Kaibosworth is very right that the issue fails to register in open-ended polls, but that doesn't mean that Americans don't care. It just means that there is a greater sense of immediacy for most people about issues like the Iraq War, health care, and the economy. The goal of the ad campaign is literally to get climate change on that open-ended polling map, because until that happens, we're not going to make any major political progress.
The Alliance is having these top-dollar commercials made not just to get people to conserve energy, but to drive home the connection between turning on the lights and emitting greenhouse gases. In other words, they're trying to make climate change more relevant to people's daily lives. If the public is thinking about it, they're more likely to mention it to a pollster.
Here's an example that they've been testing in some areas: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op-DyH4gyLU.
Permalink
meacassidy Posted 6:24 am
25 Mar 2008
Also needed with a individual empowerment program is a national legislative policy reformation to put us on the right path. The up front cost of some of the better technologies are deal breakers for many. This is where a national and legislative/policy drive has to be part of the equation and not policies that simply rearrange deck chairs on the Titanic.
Permalink