... sets out to become the Saudi Arabia of solar energy.
Algeria ... 4
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
Jon Rynn Posted 6:35 am
13 Aug 2007
"This is really a big change now because with all this talking about the limitations of conventional resources," oil-producing countries "feel obliged to do something," he said.
What were they doing to "torpedo renewable energies"?
Permalink
sunflower Posted 6:52 am
13 Aug 2007
$425MM capital cost for 150 MW, 83% gas, is not remotely cost effective. Solar at $15/bbl by 2020 obscures that cost is available today. Southern Spain climate could compete with Algeria climate.
My alarm bells rang when I read that Saudi Arabia suppresses solar energy, "Until now, all the oil-producing countries under the lead of Saudi Arabia did everything to torpedo renewable energies,". Absolutely not true. Not there, true here under Bush.
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 7:02 am
13 Aug 2007
grist.org
Permalink
sunflower Posted 7:34 am
13 Aug 2007
The biographer of the King sent me the message that President Clinton told the King that "solar energy would not be supported as long as oil was plentiful and cheap." The suppression of solar energy was and is a US policy, not a Saudi policy.
Their prophecy was that solar and nuclear renaissance will occur after peak oil.
Permalink