During a June 25, 2008, appearance on CNBC's Kudlow & Company, Sarah Palin said, "Sen. McCain is wrong" on the issue of oil drilling. She said, "I think he's going to evolve into eventually supporting ANWR opening also ... I'd like the opportunity to change his mind about ANWR." She was also asked about the possibility of being chosen as McCain's running mate and said, "it's really probably out of the realm of possibility to be tapped for that position, so I don't even have to worry about it."
Read the transcript of the interview below the fold.
Hat tip: Environmental Capital.
CNBC's Larry Kudlow: Sen. McCain says it's too pristine to drill, Sen. Obama says that drilling won't work, what is your response to this? How do you fight back?
Palin: Well, it will work and Sen. McCain is wrong on that issue. He's right on a whole lot of issues though, thank goodness, and he's understanding and evolving with his position on OCS [Outer Continential Shelf drilling], so that's encouraging. I think he's going to evolve into eventually supporting ANWR opening also. Obama is way off-base on all that. Those politicians who don't understand that we need more domestic supply of energy flown into our hungry markets, you know they're living in lala land and we're in a world of hurt if their agenda continues to be to lock up these safe, secure, domestic supplies of energy.
Kudlow: Tell me about the world of hurt, in your judgment. The criticism of ANWR is -- this is what you hear from people in both political parties -- there's not enough to matter, it will take too long, and it won't impact the price of oil internationally or gas at the pump. How do you respond to that?
Palin: Well, it will impact, in a positive sense, the price of fuel eventually; we've got to start somewhere. Again, we've got domestic supply sitting there underground the reserves are ready to be tapped, and nowhere more than Alaska, Alaskans would be impacted by development in ANWR and here in Alaska our constituents, the people who live here, want it drilled. That tells me that we have confidence in the safety and the responsibility that we'll see there with the development of ANWR. Remember too, Larry, we're talking about a sliver of the coastal plain of Alaska being explored and drilled for oil. It's about the footprint of a 2,000-acre plot of land that's smaller than the footprint of LAX, for instance. So it's not so grandiose an acreage that it is out of the realm of possibility for others to start understanding why it is that we can do this safely, we could have a small footprint, and not adversely impact the land, the wildlife, that's part of Alaska.
Kudlow: What have we got up there in ANWR? Just a bunch of big fat blue flies? People say nobody goes up there. Humanoids don't populate it. It's just the blue flies. I mean I want to keep the blue flies healthy; maybe you can tell us about that.
Palin: We want to keep the blue flies healthy also. It's a small portion of land up there. Alaskans understand that while we have these reserves underground ready to be tapped, we want to invite safe, responsible development. We want those who can safely develop, we want them to compete for the right to tap these resources and start feeding these hungry markets.
Kudlow: How long will it take? Sen. Obama says this and a lot of Democrats say this, some Republicans. How long will it take, Governor, to start lifting out of ANWR?
Palin: It's going to take at least five years. And there are other areas of Alaska too that have the reserves that need to be tapped, certainly offshore, there's trillions of cubic feet of natural gas and billions of barrels of oil there too that need to be tapped. We also have a natural gas pipeline that is underway now, a process to get that constructed, where we can build infrastructure and allow known reserves of natural gas up on our north slope, it's already there, it's already proven, to be tapped and flow through our natural gas pipeline. Our legislature is dealing with that issue right now, getting ready to license a company to build that gas line, again to feed these hungry markets.
Kudlow: So now you've got another case where both candidates seem to be off course. Sen. Obama wants a windfall profits tax on oil companies and Sen. McCain talks about obscene profits, which I regard as the near cousin to the windfall profits tax. What's your response to these criticisms?
Palin: Well, we just went through a process of making sure that the oil and gas resources that Alaskans own are properly taxed. We just increased a tax on profits of oil companies up here because an earlier version of Alaska's tax formula had been corrupted by some politicians who are now in prison for the corruption, but we had to revisit the way that we were going to tax profits on oil companies, we just got through that. It wasn't an obscene amount of tax placed upon them; in fact, it's driven more desire to explore and to develop with independent companies coming into Alaska. On a national level they're going to have to deal with that, but we've just dealt with it on Alaska's level, and we have a healthy valuation of our and gas reserves, and we're driving healthy revenue for our state off that.
Kudlow: Well, is "profits" a dirty word in energy or other businesses?
Palin: Well, no of course not, and low taxes we know spur the economy. I'm a Republican, I am for low taxes. We have to make sure that an appropriate value is placed on oil and gas resources, and that the people who own these resources are able to benefit from the development of them. But, no, "profit" is not a dirty word.
Kudlow: Why don't we just liberate and decontrol and deregulate the whole bloody energy business whether it's oil, gas, shale, nuclear, coal, natural gas, as well as wind and solar? Why don't we just decontrol, deregulate, go for an America First energy policy. Get independent of Saudi Arabia. America first, create all these millions of high paying jobs, why isn't anybody talking about that in this race? That's the natural Reaganesque thing to do, isn't it?
Palin: Yeah, absolutely. You're hitting the nail right on the head. That's what so many of us normal Americans are asking, same thing, why aren't our candidates talking like that? Where we can secure American and we could be more independent when we talk about energy sources if we could drill domestically. Here we sent [Energy] Secretary Bodman overseas the other day, and our President had to visit the Saudis to ask them to ramp up development. That's nonsense, not when you know that we have the supplies here. You have the supplies in your sister state called Alaska where we're ready, willing, and we're able to pump these supplies of energy, flow them into hungry markets across the U.S. We want it to happen, it's Congress holding us back.
Kudlow: I've got some sound from Sen. John McCain. Please take a listen:
[Questioner: Would you consider Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for a vice presidential running mate?
Sen. McCain: Could I say that this meeting is adjourned? We're still going through the process, but the Governor of Alaska is a wonderful person and very popular in her state and a very honest and straightforward one, and I think has a future in our party.]
Kudlow: Governor, you probably heard Sen. McCain waltz his way through that one. If he asked you to be his vice president, would you accept in light of your disagreement, apparently, over ANWR drilling?
Palin: I'd like the opportunity to change his mind about ANWR, I'll tell you that. But, Larry I'm going to give you the same answer that any other potential VP gives you and that is I really enjoy my job here in Alaska as Governor. I believe that there's a lot that Alaska could be and should be doing to contribute to the rest of the U.S. and I think I can do that in my job here in Alaska. I know that the other potential VPs are saying the same thing that they like where they are today. I also have to say though that it's really probably out of the realm of possibility to be tapped for that position, so I don't even have to worry about it.
Kudlow: Well, OK, you've got a lot of work to do drilling up there to help to rest of America, but let me ask one final question: In your judgment, Is it time for the Republican Party to put a woman on the ticket?
Palin: We're overdue for that, absolutely. I would love to see that happen.
Comments
View as Flat
hapa Posted 7:10 am
29 Aug 2008
"but think about the good press for alaska!"
"oh! right! i'll call him back right now!"
"and have those ANWR talking points ready."
"hey, someone's forgetting about a certain bullet-list tattoo...?"
Permalink
Tasermons Partner Posted 2:45 pm
29 Aug 2008
Permalink
LGT Posted 3:08 pm
29 Aug 2008
http://feww.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/hilarious-polar-bear ...
Permalink
trock Posted 9:44 pm
29 Aug 2008
Those who think that offshore drilling can be used as a bargaining chip for concessions in other areas are wrong. Offshore and ANWR drilling has no value because Republican want Democrats to be against offshore and ANWR drilling. So they will bargain so that Democrats keep the offshore oil drilling ban and keep bashing them over the head with it.
It doesn't matter that the rate of oil from these places will be to slow to have a price effect. Most people won't follow along with the logic. Most people will say lets at least have whatever oil we can from there. Some Republicans have said on TV interviews that if we keep the ban in place it will be 6 and 7 dollar gasoline and if we lift the ban we can get it down to 2 dollars. No matter how ridiculous that is, that's what the majority of people will remember.
You can't come to people with what they think is a very stupid idea, this ban on offshore and ANWR drilling and then convince them with your very smart ideas. Most people think the ban is stupid.
I agree this ban is stupid. It was always stupid. It doesn't actually get you anything. The only way that a ban on offshore and ANWR drilling could last indefinitely is if worldwide oil usage would drop so much that the world would never need the oil. And that's the only thing that we can work for.
I'm for all the energy avoidance, energy efficiency and energy renewables (nondepleatables and nonexhaustables) that we can implement, but in a political world we have to be smarter than we are stupid.
The only thing to do is lift the ANWR and offshore oil drilling bans.
Permalink
vakibs Posted 9:32 pm
01 Sep 2008
This is a dangerous person out there, McCain is an angel in comparison to her.
Democrats should NOT lose this election.
Let's think in terms of eco-dollars.
Permalink
vakibs Posted 10:08 pm
01 Sep 2008
This is what Bob Herbert of New York Times says about her. His essay is a must read for all the people working for the Obama-Biden ticket.
Let's ignore Sarah Palin. In some battles, distractions can be very costly.
Let's think in terms of eco-dollars.
Permalink
314159265 Posted 11:07 pm
01 Sep 2008
wrrrrrrrrrrrrr... To ROTFL or not to ROTFL...
O.K. with Reagan, Quayle, GWB, etc. you are used to ridicu-lousity in politics, but, wrrrrrrrr... don't you see the declaration of mental bancruptcy?
O.K. Poland or Chechoslovakia got similar idiot politicos, but, wrrrrrrrrrrr...
U.S. of Alzheimer???
Mars J. Pictor Florifulgurator, Western Bavarian Forest.
Permalink