Why buying cheap energy certificates worsens climate change 16 Posted 12 hours, 36 minutes ago
Do diesel-based farmers dream of electric tractors? 6 Posted 7 hours, 27 minutes ago
Copenhagen climate summit (part 1): the expectations 0 Posted 11 hours, 8 minutes ago
Which is more painful, Giuliani's line that we can deal with global warming through energy independence or Romney's line that it's not "American warming" but "global warming"? (A question for the Mittster: if, as you say, tackling this problem is going to enrich our economy, our environment, and our national security, why on earth would we wait for China to act? Seems like we'd want to get right on that, no?)
(Thanks LL!)
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Franken win means another likely Senate vote for climate action
Los Angeles rejects solar plan, still likes solar power
Comments
View as Flat
Jim Manzi Posted 12:20 am
13 Dec 2007
Permalink
Rita Pluto Posted 1:58 am
13 Dec 2007
"I believe, I believe global-"
"-serious? yes-"
"-and i believe climate change is real-"
"-let's have a chance to talk"
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 3:28 am
13 Dec 2007
The only one who possibly is motivated to do something constructive, were he to take over in the White House, is John McCain. But who knows?, maybe he is just pandering to independent voters in New Hampshire.
In their post-mortem conversation with Wolf Blitzer yesterday evening, Jack Cafferty commented that the moderator was terrible -- and that is plenty evident in this snippet -- ; and Jeffrey Toobin said that the inclusion of the bizarre Alan Keyes, and indulging him in his vanity campaign, was a waste of everyone's time.
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink