A thought out of season

Noise, signal, and the presidential election 2

Say David is right and the 2008 presidential election comes down to Obama vs. McCain. That means we're looking at historic, though frankly probably inadequate, climate-change legislation.

On foreign policy, McCain has been an abysmal apologist for the Iraq debacle. That doesn't bode well. But Obama, to prove he's not a weak-kneed liberal, might be goaded into taking crudely aggressive stances -- just as Bill Clinton seemed to take a poke at Iraq every time Monica-gate took a turn for the worse.

On farm and food policy, they look like a wash. At least McCain has dared speak bluntly now and again on the fraud that is corn-based ethanol (although he has cravenly reversed that position). Obama hails from a Big Ag state, loves ethanol, and once even (according to Ken Sliverstein in the November 2006 Harper's, unavailable online) hitched a ride on the Archer Daniels Midland corporate jet.

I'm wondering, given the viable options on the table, if all the machinations leading up to the 2008 election might be more noise than signal.

Rather than obsessing over who's up and who's down, we might more usefully spend our time thinking real hard about how to thwart odious long-term trends playing out before our eyes: like, say, the rise in consumption of noxious fuel sources like coal, nuclear, and tar sands in response to high oil prices.

Grist food editor Tom Philpott farms and cooks at Maverick Farms, a sustainable-agriculture nonprofit and small farm in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. Follow my Twitter feed; contact me at tphilpott[at]grist[dot]org.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Greta Posted 7:45 am
    06 Jan 2008

    You Get a Do-OverOkay, Tom, I must call foul on this one.  
    You know good and well that Grist readers/bloggers are perfectly capable of obsessing about more than one subject at a time.
    Your argument is a bit akin to "there are children starving in Africa, so don't fret over your broken leg".
    I appreciate the opinions of others (who I respect) regarding the presidential candidates.  The reason that the discussions are worthy of the bandwidth is that primaries and caucuses seem to matter.  Good candidates drop out of the race because of those showings.  So, I welcome the impressions and links from others to help me make an informed decision come primary and/or general election day.
    [That being said, I live in Florida and have no idea who I will be allowed to even consider in the primaries.]
    So, Tom, I believe that you owe Grist.com and few more 1s and 0s. (No hard feelings.)

    www.NoPunProductions.com ~ AmericaTheGreen.org
  2. dwafree Posted 4:18 am
    07 Jan 2008

    What about Edwards?Say David is wrong and the Iowa straw poll and the current media spin have not yet determined the candidates.  What do you think of Edwards?

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement