A compulsive ... nontruth-teller
John McCain avoids using the word ‘mandatory’ when discussing cap-and-trade 8
Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
Related Stories
Add a Comment
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Threaded
odograph Posted 11:15 am
14 Feb 2008
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 1:45 am
15 Feb 2008
Therefore, in November we may need to put not only a Democrat in the White House, but also a 60-plus majority in the Senate.
Unless of course it is Obama who wins the White House, in which case we do not have to worry, he will be able to get everybody to act postpartisanly regardless of what their irrelevant old parties are.
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
Delay And Deny Posted 2:14 am
15 Feb 2008
The bottom line is that until the mass hysteria whipped up by Al Gore dies down, Moderates will have to make up lukewarm support for some fallacious policy.
Maybe by 2009 things will get back to normal once it's discovered that GW is totally naturogenic.
Permalink
Biodiversivist Posted 2:41 am
15 Feb 2008
More on the subject from the one of the wisest men to ever walk the face of this planet:
http://www.twainquotes.com/Lies.html
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
odograph Posted 8:06 am
15 Feb 2008
In his annual "state of the industry" speech yesterday to Wall Street, Thomas Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute, the utility industry's lobby, stressed the need for any emissions cap to be, as he put it, "realistic."
Among other things, in deciding under a cap how to distribute emission "allowances" to utilities, the government should put an "upper limit on the price" of those allowances, he said. In other words, even if the government requires utilities to pay for some of their emission allowances rather than handing them all out for free, the government should make sure those permits don't get too expensive.
How do you like those apples?
A cap and trade that makes sure everyone can keep on consuming that energy!
Permalink
dayla2000 Posted 7:17 pm
17 Feb 2008
For a sampling of McCain vs. McCain, watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioy90nF2anI
Permalink
caniscandida Posted 8:25 pm
17 Feb 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/opinion/17kristof.html.
I agree with Kristof, that McCain's opinions on just about everything important are objectionable. And I might add that by many accounts, McCain seems to have been a really obnoxious punk back in school, several decades ago. But I also agree with Kristof, sort of, that McCain's inward dedication to telling the truth will make itself manifest, somehow, eventually.
And probably that is a deeply felt authority issue with him, going back to his youthful punkishness. When he tries to pander, for example by suppressing "mandatory," he will not get away with it, and he knows it, and he will be his own worst accuser.
Chickens are our cousins! So are fish! So are other sentient animals! Let us learn to be kind.
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 8:01 am
02 Sep 2008
Party Platform, McCain Differ on Immigration, Climate
McCain has said addressing climate change would be a top priority if he's elected. He backs mandatory limits on greenhouse-gas emissions and a cap-and-trade system to help bring that about.
http://news.yahoo.com/story//bloomberg/20080827/pl_bloomb ...
_
Smell like BS, huh?
-David Ahlport
Permalink