What it means for the U.S. to lead again

International mercury pact shows that India and China will follow our lead 3

The news that the Obama administration is on board with an international pact to significantly decrease mercury use is fantastic for those of us committed to switching from dirty coal power to clean, renewable energy sources.

This is a bold step for the U.S.—one that is a long-time coming for coal-fired power plants. Coal plants are one of the largest sources of man-made mercury pollution in the U.S.

Mercury pollution causes brain damage and other developmental problems in unborn children and infants, and it has been linked to a greater risk of coronary heart disease in men. A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study found that 8 percent of women had mercury blood levels exceeding the level deemed safe for unborn children by the Environmental Protection Agency. Our mercury regulations should be strict to protect public health and the environment.

Yet it was this quote from the Washington Post article on the international mercury treaty that stuck out to my colleagues and me: “Once the administration said it was reversing the course set by President George W. Bush, China, India and other nations also agreed to endorse the goal of a mandatory treaty.

For too long we’ve heard the regulation nay-sayers use the excuse that whatever restrictions and regulations we introduce will only hurt the U.S. economically because China and India will not do the same. This mercury treaty shows the reality: If the U.S. acts first, then China and India will follow.

This bodes well for carbon legislation. The U.S. must act first on carbon regulation. China and India will follow our lead.

Bruce Nilles is the director of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign, the largest component of Sierra Club’s new Climate Recovery Partnerships. The Beyond Coal Campaign is working to reduce America’s over reliance on coal, slash coal’s contribution to global warming and other pollution woes, end destructive mining, and secure massive investments in clean energy alternatives.

Bruce joined the Sierra Club in 2002. He previously worked as a staff attorney for Earthjustice’s San Francisco office, and during the Clinton Administration as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division in Washington D.C. He received his J.D. and B.S. degrees from the University of Wisconsin.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. ids's avatar

    ids Posted 11:08 am
    26 Feb 2009

    YesIt's good for Illinois coal, the Illinois Sierra Club also endorsed Blagojevich for his strong stand against dirty power over mercury, because Illinois coal is lower in mercury when burned, though much dirtier.  So without any other treaties, more exports for Ill!  Thanks from the ill state, sorry to choke the rest of the world, better luck next time
  2. Pompey Road Posted 12:05 pm
    26 Feb 2009

    Dirty coal:You must not watch much TV, everybody always uses the word clean in front of coal now.
    Funny for centuries it was dirty and no big deal, it was coal. You called it what it was! Now corporate media introduce new terms and words into the language on a regular basis.
    Outsourcing, legacy cost, clean coal. Dickens would not have been able to write in this era. Its hard to picture a street urchin without the coal black on his face. A chimney sweep has to wear white now and coal stoves don't bellow black smoke.

    The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
  3. amazingdrx Posted 10:07 pm
    26 Feb 2009

    Good one BruceThis is a great example for foreign policy of the climate related variety.
    So why do China and India want to follow?  I think iot is similar to the way regulation works inside national boundaries.  When regulation imposes the same basic environmental restrictions on all business operators, the honest businesses thrive.  With no regulation or industry self regulation the worst polluters have a competitive advantage.
    The truth is that the best businesses value the ecosystem around them.  And so do the best nations.  It becomes a competition to lead in clean green energy use and manufacturing.  Let the games begin, with real regulation and real fair free trade.  And worker safety health and pay issues as important as profit.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement