Transition talk: Labor of love

Obama announces Solis for Labor and LaHood for Transportation 6

Muckraker: Grist on Politics

Barack Obama announced four new members of his team in a press conference Friday afternoon, including Rep. Ray LaHood (R-Ill.) for secretary of transportation and Rep. Hilda Solis for secretary of labor.

Solis, Obama said, would be a leader in creating green-collar jobs. “We’re also going to have to train our workers to be prepared for these jobs of the future,” said Obama. “If we’re going to build a smart grid, for example ... We have a shortage right now of workers who could do all that work. We’re going to have to create a pipeline through the Department of Labor.”

In her brief remarks, Solis said she wanted to put Americans to work overhauling the nation’s energy infrastructure. “These are jobs that will supply good jobs for all working families,” said Solis.

LaHood, Obama said, would bring experience and bipartisanship to his work on the nation’s transportation infrastructure.

“Few understand our infrastructure challenge better than the outstanding public servant I am asking to lead the Department of Transportation,” said Obama. “As a congressman from Illinois, Ray served six years on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, leading efforts to modernize our aviation system by renewing our aging airports and ensuring that air traffic controllers were using cutting edge technology. Throughout his career, Ray has fought to improve mass transit and invest in our highways. But he has not only helped rebuild our landscape, he has helped beautify it by creating opportunities for bikers and runners to enjoy our great outdoors.

“When I began this appointment process, I said I was committed to finding the best person for the job, regardless of party,” Obama continued. “Ray’s appointment reflects that bipartisan spirit—a spirit we need to reclaim in this country to make progress for the American people.”

In his remarks, LaHood said, “President Obama and I share the same philosophy on infrastructure ... His agenda for transportation is my agenda for transportation. We have a task before us to rebuild America.” LaHood called for the United States to “continue to be a leader” and to make improvements in Amtrak, mass transit, and light rail.

Obama emphasized that both LaHood and Solis have important roles to play in his administration’s economic and energy policy.

“Our economy boomed in the 20th century when President Eisenhower remade the American landscape by building the interstate highway system. Now we need to remake our transportation system for the 21st century,” he said. “Doing so will not only help us meet our energy challenge by building more efficient cars, buses, and subways or make Americans safer by rebuilding our crumbling roads and bridges—it will create millions of new jobs in the process.”

Kate Sheppard is Grist’s political reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Dan Howitt Posted 4:43 am
    20 Dec 2008

    LaHood and Solis"Obama emphasized that both LaHood and Solis have important roles to play in his administration's economic and energy policy."
    Dan Howitt
  2. Dan Howitt Posted 4:45 am
    20 Dec 2008

    bipartisanshipLaHood, Obama said, would bring experience and bipartisanship to his work on the nation's transportation infrastructure.
    I think so as well.
    Dan Howitt
  3. ryskeeman Posted 8:34 am
    21 Dec 2008

    New Era?Transportation policy is enormously important. Specifically, what types of transportation policy shifts would you like to see enacted? Are we actually going to see a shift that will create movement towards making viable alternatives to personal automobile use and infrastructure? Furthermore, will these movements actually be very effective? Or rather are we going to see examples like Portland where a lot of energy, talk, and money has been used towards public transportation yet 94% of all trips are still made by the personal automobile? I heard talk of light rails and such but I would like to point out the success of Bus Rapid Transit systems that essentially grant an exclusive lane to buses and allow them to move  efficiently throughout the city. Think differently about buses! Most importantly, Bus Rapid Transit systems are wayyyyy cheaper than light rails. We need our public transportation money to go further and be more effective! Making an alternative form of transportation in our urban areas viable will also address traffic congestion and more money can be spent on public transportation and less on highways. Please make alternative transportation viable!
  4. Darrell Posted 4:54 pm
    21 Dec 2008

    BRT: you get what you pay forUnfortunately you get what you pay for with "wayyyy cheaper" BRT.
    Two examples from Los Angeles are the Wilshire "Rapid" buses that carry a lot of people but despite limited stops and some signal priority are slow in traffic -- and will be replaced with a subway -- and the Orange Line dedicated busway that is already out of capacity and takes 50% longer than a light rail line would have.
    See also details of Eugene, Oregon's BRT.
    BRT is an improvement over regular bus service, but falls short of light rail's speed, comfort, and capacity.
  5. ryskeeman Posted 12:53 am
    24 Dec 2008

    Cars, Light Rails, and Ariel Trams Oh My!Light Rails are great but I think that our discourse about public transportation does not begin and end with light rails.
    I think that it is dangerous to base our conceptions of a viable public transportation system solely on the shoulder of the light rail.  Let's face it. Light rails have their downsides and are not practical for a lot of situations. It is like going to a retail camera store and only having the salesperson show you the most expensive, best rated professional camera and being told the rest just isn't worth your time. Reluctantly, you realize that you can't afford that camera and the other cameras aren't worth your time and so you just don't take pictures of that new baby. What a shame.
    Bus Rapid Transit systems are going to be an integral part of the future urban world in developing countries. Curitiba, Brazil has a particularly effective BRT system that is worth a look.    
    All I'm saying is that bus systems have more potential than we are used to thinking. If we focus only on light rails we will find ourselves getting a handful of new light rails projects (did i mention they were "wayyy" expensive?) to be finished within 10 years and less money and political capital to try other alternatives. Why not use the road infrastructure that we already have? Don't get me wrong. Light rails are great. I just think that we should open our mind.
  6. Dan Howitt Posted 12:18 pm
    24 Dec 2008

    re: new era?I fully agree.  Thanks for the sharing.

    Dan Howitt

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement