As the economy tailspins, President Franklin D. Roosevelt has replaced Abraham Lincoln as the favored Great President of commentators, against whom Obama is most often measured (or illuminated).
President Obama still expresses his “affinity” with Lincoln and, as we are learning about this smart and subtle man, he makes the point with small, deft gestures. Seafood stew was served for lunch on Inauguration Day, just as it was for President Lincoln.
So which is he, another Lincoln or an FDR? And which crisis—the looming secession of the southern states in 1862 or the Great Depression of 1932—is the better model for our own terrible straits?
In his First Inaugural Address, President Roosevelt made no mention of international threats. Fascism was no concern yet to America, and the primary task of the “loyal army willing to sacrifice,” in which FDR called Americans to enlist, would be “putting our own national house in order.”
Jefferson Davis was inaugurated as the President of the Confederacy just two weeks before President Lincoln took the oath of office, and Lincoln began his inaugural speech by earnestly promising that he had no intention, “directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery…” But the die had been cast and the only choice was to submit slavery to the test of arms or allow the Secession.
Although it is comforting to think so, climate cataclysm is not an Axis powers-like threat that will emerge after the immediate economic meltdown has been massaged, allowing Obama to address crises in succession, as FDR faced the Great Depression and then the Second World War. Climate must be addressed now. Obama cannot afford the luxury of the four years Lincoln was allowed to arrive at the truth of the matter.
“The specter of a warming planet” President Obama addressed in his Inaugural Address can be stopped by one measure alone: an immediate halt to burning coal and the quick phase-out of oil. Cutting off fossil fuel is as far outside our imagination as the notion of ending slavery was for President Lincoln and the nation in 1862. Obama’s emphasis on energy efficiency and renewables ducks the central issue, just as Lincoln’s narrow parsing of slavery, considered only in terms of new states entering the Union, begged the fundamental question of whether slavery should exist anywhere.
The world’s coal and oil companies have issued their own declaration of secession from the common good. Without apology, they announce their intention to ignore climate cataclysm in the interest of huge profit and disdain any notion that alternative energy will impinge upon their business.
Peabody Energy advises investors that “Coal is the fastest-growing fuel in the world, and Peabody is the world’s largest coal company…” Exxon-Mobil reports to its shareholders that “oil, gas and coal will be indispensable to meet the demand for reliable, affordable energy for the foreseeable future.”
To weather this crisis, on which the fate of the world hangs, President Obama must be another President Lincoln, but a Lincoln in his second term. In his Second Inaugural Address, Lincoln said of slaveholders and abolitionists that “the prayers of both could not be answered.”
So too, President Obama must state without delay that humanity cannot continue a way of life based on fossil fuels, under the misbegotten belief that they are cheap and without moral cost. This too is an illusion cast by a “peculiar and powerful interest” as pernicious and deadly as slavery.
Comments
View as Flat
Ken Ward Posted 9:10 am
12 Feb 2009
Ken Ward
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
//
var l=new Array();
var output = '';
l[0]='>';l[1]='a';l[2]='/';l[3]='';l[24]='\"';l[25]=' 103';l[26]=' 114';l[27]=' 111';l[28]=' 46';l[29]=' 115';l[30]=' 101';l[31]=' 110';l[32]=' 105';l[33]=' 108';l[34]=' 116';l[35]=' 104';l[36]=' 103';l[37]=' 105';l[38]=' 114';l[39]=' 98';l[40]=' 64';l[41]=' 110';l[42]=' 101';l[43]=' 107';l[44]=':';l[45]='o';l[46]='t';l[47]='l';l[48]='i';l[49]='a';l[50]='m';l[51]='\"';l[52]='=';l[53]='f';l[54]='e';l[55]='r';l[56]='h';l[57]='a ';l[58]='
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 9:16 am
12 Feb 2009
grist.org
Permalink
Pompey Road Posted 10:30 am
12 Feb 2009
"The prayers of both could not be answered"
The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
Permalink
hapa Posted 10:41 am
12 Feb 2009
Permalink
Pompey Road Posted 11:57 am
12 Feb 2009
That is if I believed in hell of course!
I am not a communist but I do believe that religion is the opiate for the masses.
That whole region is like a millstone around the neck of the world. We need to get off oil just for this reason if no other. We should never have to interject ourselves into the affairs of that region for oil or anything else.
The 7th Century mentality that pervades that region is not condusive to a stable energy policy.
We can squander our national treasury if we had any on oil wars for the next 50 years. Or we can take advantage of the new push for alternative evergy sources we don't have to choose sides for.
The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
Permalink
crotach Posted 10:53 pm
12 Feb 2009
Permalink
jeffgreen11 Posted 11:09 pm
12 Feb 2009
oil rich countrys are increasing their own oil usage, possible decreasing oil exports in the future.
sending our dollars overseas
global warming anyone?
one less thing to fight about in the future. (national security)
Permalink
Pompey Road Posted 11:57 pm
12 Feb 2009
The first round, the Economic Recovery Plan was easy, he is leading up to the second round of trying to stabilize the markets and free up the lending/credit market. The truth about how much debt has been hidden from us because there is no transparency in banking or the markets will be unveiled when Geithner attempts to secure the funding necessary to get all the toxic debt off the books. This will be the bomb that reintroduces panic back into the markets at a level we have not experienced since 29. The funding needed for the cash infusion to the banks to free up lending will be miniscule when viewed beside the money needed to keep the institutions solvent.
Nothing to fear but fear itself won't cover it this time. He knows he is going to have to try to keep society from falling apart once the full truth about the depth of this crisis comes out.
The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
Permalink
Pompey Road Posted 7:37 am
13 Feb 2009
The word energy in the last sentence was misspelled and as I was correctly reminded,
I should have used the terms renewable or sustainable energy sources! Humans have no alternatives if we are to survive.
The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
Permalink
hapa Posted 1:00 pm
13 Feb 2009
our choice.
Permalink