The first step toward recovery

Obama lays out his economic stimulus plan 3

Barack Obama. Photo: David Katz/Obama for America via Flickr

Barack Obama.

On Thursday, President-elect Barack Obama called for doubling production of alternative energy in the United States over the next three years as part of his “American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.” In a speech officially rolling out the plan, he also set a goal of retrofitting more than 75 percent of federal buildings and 2 million homes to make them more energy-efficient.

“In the process, we will put Americans to work in new jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced—jobs building solar panels and wind turbines; constructing fuel-efficient cars and buildings; and developing the new energy technologies that will lead to even more jobs, more savings, and a cleaner, safer planet in the bargain,” he said. (He did not say, nor is it entirely clear, why jobs manufacturing turbines and cars can’t be outsourced.)

Obama also pledged to make major investments in infrastructure, including not just road and bridge repairs but construction of a new, national “smart grid” that “will save us money, protect our power sources from blackout or attack, and deliver clean, alternative forms of energy to every corner of our nation.”

A draft of the full plan [PDF] circulating on Capitol Hill outlines more specifics, including a call for a federal renewable-energy standard of 25 percent by 2025 and an extension of the production tax credit for renewable energy.

The draft includes $50 billion in loan guarantees to help the auto industry “retool, develop new battery technologies, and produce the next generation of fuel-efficient cars here in America.” This figure is double what Congress allotted last year, and the Obama plan calls for speedier dispersion of the funding as well.

The plan also calls for the creation of an Advanced Manufacturing Fund that would be used to support promising new manufacturing strategies. There’s no dollar figure on the fund, but the plan says it would be based on a peer-review process and similar to Michigan’s 21st Century Jobs Fund.  It calls for a doubling of the Manufacturing Extension Partnership, which works with manufacturers to improve efficiency and spur new technologies, but whose funding has been cut in recent years.

The plan also reasserts Obama’s campaign promise of investing $150 billion over the next 10 years in clean energy programs, and called for funding for the commercialization of plug-in hybrids, “low emissions coal plants,” and a new electricity grid. There’s also a call for clean-energy job training programs, though there’s no specific figure attached to that, either.

Notably absent from the draft of the plan is any specific mention of funding for public transportation.

In his speech, Obama predicted that his plan would “save or create at least 3 million jobs over the next few years,” the majority of them in the private sector. “It’s a plan that recognizes both the paradox and the promise of this moment—the fact that there are millions of Americans trying to find work, even as, all around the country, there is so much work to be done,” said Obama. “That’s why we’ll invest in priorities like energy and education, health care and a new infrastructure, that are necessary to keep us strong and competitive in the 21st century.”

Obama pledged that the package would be “free from earmarks and pet projects.” In total, the plan is expected to cost between $675 billion and $775 billion over the next two years.

The president-elect emphasized that swift passage of a plan is necessary. “For every day we wait or point fingers or drag our feet, more Americans will lose their jobs. More families will lose their savings. More dreams will be deferred and denied,” he said. “And our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse.”

UPDATE: Environmentalists are giving a big thumbs-up to Obama’s plan—get the story.

Kate Sheppard is Grist’s political reporter.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. stopgreenpath Posted 6:11 am
    08 Jan 2009

    another Big Energy Boondoggletoo bad nobody was able to show Obama how the BEST way to prop up property values, rapidly scale renewable energy, reduce GHGs, create local jobs, and build an income stream for the middle class is a nationwide renewable energy loan and feed in tariff program so that ALL OF US could install PV and microwind on our properties and be paid for power we produce and do not consume.
    it's cheaper, MUCH better for the environment, democratic, and a GREAT investment for all of us who lost 40% of our nut last year.  not to mention that it's proven to work fantastically (40 nations already out ahead of us on this), and has also proven to be the most effective incentive for energy conservation.
    but no.  Big Energy is gonna get millions of acres of functioning ecosystem that is owned by us, and not only be allowed, but be encouraged to permanently destroy it to re-entrench their monopolies.  and the worst part?  WE have to pay for it, not Big Energy!!!  So we are literally, digging our own environmental and economic graves by being forced to pay for monopolistic energy infrastructure that is harmful to us and the planet.
    meet the new boss (Big Renewables).  same as the old boss (Big Fossils).  and what's even worse?  it's being greenwashed by sellouts calling themselves "environmentalists."  the planet and ratepayers are still stuck at the bottom of their pyramid scheme, totally exploited for private profits.  disgusting.

    the greenest energy is that which you needn't ever produce.
  2. GreyFlcn Posted 9:53 am
    08 Jan 2009

    re: stopgreenpathWould you please quit with that bullshit.
    Net Metered Solar Panels need a Grid just as much as anything else does.
    Whining and moaning and saying how they magically DON'T is just dishonest, and annoying.
    _
    Either give us a REAL solution, or shut up.

    -David Ahlport
  3. MikeH Posted 6:48 am
    09 Jan 2009

    Totally AgreeWhile I'm all for a nationwide net metering law, thinking it will solve our energy problems shows a tenuous grip on reality at best.  Wind power is vastly more economical at utility scales, and planting a wind turbine in a wheat field or pasture hardly qualifies as "destroying the wilderness".  Likewise, photovoltaics are not even in the same efficiency league as thermal solar, which doesn't scale down to household installations very well, at least for electricity production.  Finally, tens of millions of Americans live in urban settings.  Where is someone who lives in an apartment in Manhattan supposed to install their solar panels?
    This vitroilic rant against the best energy plan we've ever had seems both misplaced and counterproductive.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement