Playing the blame game

Massive flooding in western Washington linked to man-made causes 3

I-5 flooded in Washington

I-5 flooded in Chehalis, Wash.

After digging itself out of "Snowmageddon" over the holidays, western Washington was hit with heavy rainfall this week, causing massive flooding. Roads, including major arteries like I-5 (pictured above), are closed and entire neighborhoods evacuated.

Sure, Seattle’s known for its rain, but this is ridiculous! So who’s responsible? Well, us, it turns out.

Scientists say a man-made triple whammy of logging, development, and climate change are to blame. And we shouldn’t be surprised ...

A year ago (almost to the day), University of Washington geologist David Montgomery issued a warning to state legislators about the flooding that ravaged the region in 2007:

"It appears to me that the flooding and landslide problems (from)
this December storm stem from the combination of an unusually large
storm and decades of risky behavior both in upland forestry practices
and downstream floodplain development.


"The combination put people at risk and will do so again under the present system."

Silly scientist! What does he know?

Sarah van Schagen is Grist’s Seattle editor.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Delay And Deny's avatar

    Delay And Deny Posted 2:05 pm
    09 Jan 2009

    W. WA not place to live

    People are mistaken in thinking that soddy, rain washed Western Washington is a place to live.
    I say, go East, young couple...to Moses Lake or the interior.  Plenty of space there...and check out those rainfall numbers on the interior...yep, it's a Paradise waiting to bloom!

    ...if there are self made Purgatories, then we all have to live in them.


    --"This Side of Paradise", TOS
  2. abbeyroad Posted 11:32 am
    14 Jan 2009

    Western Washington > Eastern WashingtonI cannot let this stand - Western Washington is not only a place to live, it is a great place to live, and my home. Contrary to popular belief, Seattle (and, by extension, Western Washington) is not the rainiest city in the world. New York and many other cities receive more rain. And one nice side effect of the rain that we do receive is our luscious greenness - not to be found east of the mountains! In Western Washington, paradise has bloomed.
  3. delpadre Posted 2:35 pm
    14 Jan 2009

    Maybe I'm arguing just to argue...... but while many (if not most) cities in the Northeast may receive a greater total annual precipitation than Seattle, it does precipitate more frequently (more days) in Seattle. Therefore, while it may rain/snow more in total in Boston than it does in Seattle, there are far fewer rainy/snowy days in Boston. So I suppose the definition of "rainiest" is key in that argument.
    Also, the Seattle area, in relation to much of Western WA, has less annual precipitation due to the rain shadow effect (Olympic Mountains to the west). For example, to the south of the Seattle area, on average Olympia receives 12.5 more inches of precipitation. A more dramatic example would be the coastal town of Westport, WA, which on average receives 36.3 more inches of precipitation than Seattle.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement