“On Darwin’s Birthday, Only 4 in 10 Believe in Evolution”
Why buying cheap energy certificates worsens climate change 21 Posted 1 day ago
Do diesel-based farmers dream of electric tractors? 8 Posted 19 hours, 5 minutes ago
Copenhagen climate summit (part 1): the expectations 1 Posted 22 hours, 46 minutes ago
David Roberts is staff writer for Grist. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/drgrist.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
JMG Posted 10:24 am
11 Feb 2009
We're going to screw around with cap-and-trade schemes to enrich a different set of bastards who come from the same mold as as the last set (and from many of the same Ivy League schools) and we're going to pour as much money down the drain as possible in a vain attempt to keep carburbia going, even as we turn the currency into toilet paper and the atmosphere into a thick, warm blanket.
So I'm pulling back on climate activism and am instead going to concentrate on growing as much food as I can on my 0.2 acre city lot (probably can put half of that under vegetables and fruit and nut trees). I spent today working on my sheet composting -- manure, then cardboard, then mulch.
So I'm not going to argue with the creationists, the biofuelish, the climate change deniers or any combination of the above any more --- it just wastes my time.
I did find something encouraging recently that the foodies on Grist should know about --
SPIN gardening and SPIN farming (SPIN = Small Plot INtensive). It's great stuff. First hopeful thing I've seen since Obama started showing that he's just going to give us a higher class of disappointment.
http://www.spingardening.com/
http://www.spinfarming.com/
The 5% Project
Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay.
Permalink
biodiversivist Posted 11:19 am
11 Feb 2009
In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
Permalink
wesrolley Posted 1:23 pm
11 Feb 2009
While she could not get it published, it is still a source of ideas.
Wes Rolley
CoChair - EcoAction Committee
Green Party US
Permalink
Easterbunny Posted 11:28 pm
11 Feb 2009
Another thought: the question used in the poll is part of the problem. Scientific theories are not things to "believe in". I was asked at a conference dinner recently whether I believed in global warming. It struck me that the question itself was just so wrong. Anyone who phrases the question in this way is unable to distinguish between science and religion. I patiently explained that it's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of whether you understand the evidence. Naturally, the person asking the question had no idea what I was talking about.
Permalink
Baby Boomer Posted 11:49 pm
11 Feb 2009
Permalink
Colin Wright Posted 2:14 am
12 Feb 2009
This belongs on some Christian site -- not Grist. No proselytzing for your company, product or religion, please!
Permalink
David Roberts Posted 2:41 am
12 Feb 2009
grist.org
Permalink
Colin Wright Posted 3:35 am
12 Feb 2009
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 3:48 am
12 Feb 2009
Diverse faithbased fundamentalist groups from the Saudis to the Amish are beginning to believe in solar power. Will they start calling it a gift from Allah? Maybe.
Anyway you look at it, belief in "big savings" will be justified with a lot of different explanations. If evolution saved people money, it would be universal gospel in no time at all.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
GreyFlcn Posted 4:27 am
12 Feb 2009
As such, we should set our sights on how to finance low carbon infrastructure.
(Which oddly, is more of a Nordhaus approach, except "Deploy Now" rather than "wait for the perfect technology". Also oddly, may use some of the same financing strategies as Nuclear.)
-David Ahlport
Permalink