Obama poised to grant emissions waiver

Move would allow California and 13 other states to set tougher tailpipe standards 10

Muckraker: Grist on Politics

President Barack Obama on Monday will direct federal regulators to move quickly on a waiver request from California and 13 other states that want to set higher fuel-economy standards for vehicles, according to a New York Times report citing two administration sources.

The Bush administration denied California’s request for a waiver in December 2007, despite evidence that the majority of the Environmental Protection Agency’s scientists supported the petition. Bush’s EPA head argued that it would result in an unenforceable patchwork of laws around the country.

Obama had promised to reverse the Bush decision during last year’s campaign, and on Jan. 21, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Air Resources Board Chair Mary Nichols sent letters to the new administration asking them to follow through. In her confirmation hearing, new EPA administrator Lisa Jackson indicated that she would reconsider their request.

The New York Times also reports that Obama will direct the Department of Transportation to begin drafting new national automobile fuel-economy regulations in compliance with the December 2007 energy bill. He is also planning to call on federal agencies to begin making government buildings more energy efficient, according to the Times.

The Washington Post also has the story, reporting that White House officials “privately trumpeted [the emissions move] to supporters as ‘the first environment and energy actions taken by the President, helping our country move toward greater energy independence.’”

While the Times says Obama’s decision will result in quick approval for California emissions waiver, the Post‘s story has a more conditional tone, saying only that the president has ordered the EPA “to reexamine two policies that could force automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars which yield fewer greenhouse gas emissions.”

UPDATE: Senate Environment and Public Works Chair Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) issued this statement Sunday night praising the move: “As Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, I will be working with the new EPA Administrator to ensure that the California waiver moves forward as fast as possible. When the waiver is signed, it will be a signal to Detroit that a huge market awaits them if they do the right thing and produce the cleanest, most efficient vehicles possible.”

UPDATE: And this from Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope: “This action deserves the loudest applause. President Obama is making good on campaign promises and sending yet another clear signal that global warming and a clean energy economy are top priorities for his administration. By beginning this process and directing EPA to review the Bush administration’s lack of action, President Obama is turning the Federal Government into a force for positive change instead of a roadblock.”

Kate Sheppard covers energy and environmental politics for Mother Jones. She was previously the political reporter for Grist and a writing fellow at The American Prospect. You can find her work here and follow her on Twitter.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. David Roberts's avatar

    David Roberts Posted 11:08 am
    25 Jan 2009

    GoodnessMary Nichols says jump, Obama says how high.

    grist.org
  2. GreenMom Posted 1:08 pm
    25 Jan 2009

    Well, honestly, DavidYou've got to admit, this one's a no-brainer.  
  3. Sam Wells Posted 2:12 pm
    25 Jan 2009

    No-Brainer ReduxGreenmom that was funny as heck because the previous administration had ... no ... brains.

    Onward through the fog
  4. GreenMom Posted 2:33 pm
    25 Jan 2009

    Hey Sam Wells..I know... I'm a fed.  I had to work for them.  They sucked.
    It's a new day.
    http://takeourplanetback.dipdive.com/#/%7E/videoplayer/0/ ...
  5. Pompey Road Posted 12:40 am
    26 Jan 2009

    The former Big 3:

    The Big Three will cry and scream but this is a good thing if they will get on board. If not Japanese auto workers will.

    The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
  6. amazingdrx's avatar

    amazingdrx Posted 12:58 am
    26 Jan 2009

    YikesI was avoiding this article because the title sounded ominous,but this is indeed great news!
    Now get our there and terminate gas guzzling ahhnoldt.  A Californian initiative could push mileage standards up very quickly and set a mark for the rest of the states.
    The eventual standard that eliminates 90% of oil use sits up over 100 mpg, a figure already reached by several plugin hybrid models.
    Arnold could end up being the next "...president of the united states who was never president of the united states" (to quote >"Firesign Theater's" take on Ben Franklin), and a progressive republican hero like Teddy Roosevelt or "Fighting Bob".


    In 1957, a Senate committee selected La Follette as one of their five greatest Senate predecessors. A 1982 survey of historians that asked them to rank the "ten greatest Senators in the nation's history" based on "accomplishments in office" and "long range impact on American history," placed La Follette first, tied with Henry Clay.[1]


    If the GOP takes a new direction, set by people like the governator, they could make a comeback, yikes.  But that's ok, we could use a challenge, a progressive challenge to keep our team honest.

    http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
  7. cheflovesbeer Posted 2:04 am
    26 Jan 2009

    Talking PointsThe car industry is already complaining about too many regulations. They will say it is many different state laws and regulations. How can we possibly build cars for each state. There is a CA standard and a federal standard. CA and 13 other states want a emission waver.  The states currently involved in the lawsuit are CA(11.95%), NY(6.31%), PA(4.06%), NJ(2.84%), WA(2.52%), AZ(2.07%), MA(2.11%), MD(1.84%), OR(1.23%), CT(1.15%), NM(0.64%), ME(0.43%), RI(0.35%), VT(0.20%). They make up 37.7% of US population.
    Also, there are several other states thinking about joining. The car companies should just bite the bullet and make cars to the CA standard. It will be cheaper then making two cars and suing the federal government to not make the lower emission cars. No one is asking for cars with higher emissions.

    I am sure you all can make a smoother presentation than I can.
  8. davedenali Posted 2:46 am
    26 Jan 2009

    re talking pointsRE: The car industry is already complaining about too many regulations. They will say it is many different state laws and regulations. How can we possibly build cars for each state

    ---
    Many people were (happily)aware of that problem. Many would also note that the largest car manufacturer in the world is now Toyota and that Honda has done relatively well with a fuel-efficient offering.  And when GM's CEO dismisses global climate disruption as BS, it's hard to feel much sympathy for companies being forced to be environmentally responsible.  Things they should have done years ago on their own.
  9. Pompey Road Posted 5:21 am
    26 Jan 2009

    Reality Check:I think if you look at what Mr. Obama is doing as opposed to what he is saying you will learn a lot about his methodology handling most all issues. He said he is kicking the California request back to the EPA for review and will decide according to their recommendation. In other words he will let the science and EPA make the decision instead of  just making an executive order out of hand.  At least this is what his press secretary said today. This would still be a refreshing decision making process compared to the brain freeze we had to endure the last 8 years.



    The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
  10. josullivan58 Posted 5:43 am
    26 Jan 2009

    Obama issending it to the EPA because this is the normal process. According to the Clean Air Act the head of the EPA is the person who grants the waver.
    I am happy to see this return to the rule of law, and I expect the waver to be quickly granted.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement