Interior Secretary Ken Salazar on Wednesday reversed the Bush administration’s move to open up tens of thousands of acres in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming to oil-shale development, the latest in a series of energy policy overhauls out of his department.
Salazar—who as a senator was the most vocal opponent of the Bush administration’s drive to open the region to shale development—announced that the DOI is withdrawing the leases on federal land that were made available on Jan. 14, at least for now.
“We are not taking it off the table for the possibility of development, but we are going to be thoughtful and deliberative,” Salazar in a call with reporters. He didn’t say when new leases would be offered, and his department is seeking comment on new lease terms.
And the enviros rejoiced.
“The Bush administration pushed these regulations through in its waning days in an effort to fast-track this destructive and unproven energy source,” said Lawson LeGate, director of Sierra Club’s hunter and angler program in a statement. “We are encouraged to see Secretary Salazar bringing science and public review back into this process. Before we rush to develop this unproven energy source, we need to know more about how it will impact our water, wildlife, and economy.”
John McCain’s troubles are the world’s troubles
Skeptics claim global warming is fake after top scientists’ emails hacked at CRU
Cast your vote for the best climate journalism
Comments
View as Flat
Pompey Road Posted 12:13 pm
25 Feb 2009
Stop Mountain Top Removal in the southern appalachian mountains. I don't want anything near to this done in the West either.
The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
Permalink
Ted Clayton Posted 1:28 am
26 Feb 2009
It's too early in the game to go after oil-shale ... but well-logs, otoh, are always valuable & desired, at any stage of the game.
The Alberta tar sands are the focus right now ... but making it look like the U.S. is about to horn in their action (by opening up our own greasy-dirt enterprise) could have also been partly 'for their benefit'.
Permalink
tmullins Posted 5:38 am
26 Feb 2009
Hannity shut the fuck up !
Permalink