More sunlight on USDA

NYT weighs in on Vilsack pick 3

Again, I’m heartened to see media attention alight on the USDA, which until not long ago interested big-ag lobbyists, large-scale grain and cotton farmers, anti-hunger activists, and few others. The latest evidence: The New York Times editorial page has seen fit to comment on Obama’s choice of Tom Vilsack as USDA chief.

"The department he will inherit, while responsible for extraordinary gains in research and productivity, has long favored the biggest farmers," the editorial states. "That has produced a sterile landscape of factory farms, broken towns and endless miles of row crops like corn and soybeans."

It adds: "He’ll need it to move this country’s broken agricultural policy in a new direction." One aspect of that: "He also must take an impartial look at corn ethanol."

Whatever we may think of our incoming USDA chief, he is operating in a new paradigm: one in which people outside of the usual circle, including those within major-media forums, are watching, and demanding real change.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. justlou Posted 12:20 am
    21 Dec 2008

    LaLa LandThe NYTimes is in LaLaLand if they believe any corn state politician is going to give corn ethanol an impartial look.  If for no other reason than to preserve what jobs corn ethanol has created, corn ethanol has its roots firmly established in the Midwest, in Congress, in Detroit, and in the new administration.  
  2. biodiversivist's avatar

    biodiversivist Posted 6:35 am
    21 Dec 2008

    We are a country of warring special interestsWhat we need are science based federal environmental limits on wish lists.
    A hypothetical politician from a State where the citizens want to make slavery legal again can't get very far because slavery is a federal offense (at least, I think it is).
    All things being equal, if the science shows the existence of corn ethanol to be more environmentally damaging than its absence, no politician, Obama or otherwise, would be forced to destroy the planet to keep his job by lining his constituent's pockets with funds stolen from fellow countrymen.
    If the EPA and USDA don't end the corn ethanol debacle based on the latest science, it may be time to take to the streets. Obama may very well attempt to cherry pick or even ignore science as Bush did. We can't sit around this time and let another president get away with that, even if we did vote for him.

    In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world
  3. justlou Posted 11:55 pm
    21 Dec 2008

    BioDYou are not going to find many enviros who are that fired up to make corn ethanol their last stand.  The science against coal is much more solid and widely known but how many groups have taken to the streets to get rid of it?  
    Despite all the hype about the science stars in the new DC pack, Obama will be concentrating more on resuscitating the unsustainable.  If anything, I expect corn ethanol to be receiving a hefty bailout along with a new PR shine.  
    Obama is vacationing in Hawaii right now.  Do you think he is that concerned about global warming? Not enough to alter his own footprint evidently.  

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement