This ‘graph on the WSJ blog just about made me choke:
Of course, the obsession over what do to with developing countries—especially China—is one of President Bush’s biggest environmental legacies, Secretary Paulson said, continuing the administration’s week-long farewell tour. By relentlessly focusing on the role of developing-world emissions, President Bush "changed the debate," Sec. Paulson said.
Two points. First, the strategy of delaying U.S. action on climate change by recourse to fear-mongering about China and India is not a Bush invention. Conservatives (and, er, Democrats) have been pulling that crap since the ‘90s. That was the basis for the Senate rejecting Kyoto via the Byrd-Hagel Resolution.
Second, it is true that Bush has kept this delaying tactic at the center of the national debate. What is truly mystifying is why a Bush administration official who purports to be concerned about climate change would boast about it.
Comments
View as Flat
prohb Posted 5:53 pm
14 Jan 2009
Permalink
archigeek Posted 3:23 am
15 Jan 2009
The mellotron is your friend.
Permalink
Pompey Road Posted 3:51 am
15 Jan 2009
The economy will dominate the next administrations total attention and will require all our borrowed treasury funds to keep the economy from falling into total collapse. The billions already allocated to the Markets without any over sight will further erode the worlds confidence in our ability to take a leadership role on any issue. There has been no positive effect on the lending institutions to free up the capital needed for anything much less carbon capture or sequestering. All the new alternative technology advances will need capital to bring them into fruition. The hyper inflation headed our way at some point caused by the trillions of borrowed dollars and directed to self serving banking and market institutions without any oversight will buy us nothing but the image of an incompetent hollowed out ex super power with no credibility on any issue. Especially the environment that we are the major polluter of and the major reason no one will have the capital necessary to address global warming or anything else.
We will not come out of this as the major market in the world. We will not come out of this as the country with the leadership role concerning fixing the environment. We have played the obstructionist to long. I look to Europe and the European Union countries to find the economic and environmental model that will insure both economic growth and environmental standards that compliment each other. It will be hard for anyone to take us serious anymore because we are still controlled by a corporate lobby that will hang on to tradition and sell it to our governmental officials. What money we borrow for the economic recovery will be corporate lobby influenced to sustain the status quo.
The eons of time and nature was good to us down here. It was not until we become civilized that destroying our habitat become fathomable or fashionable.
Permalink