CNN—or some overworked and over-it headline writer at CNN—calls it: “Cisco Goes—What Else?—Green.” Seriously, Cisco—that’s so 2008.
Annie Leonard misses the mark in her new video, “The Story of Cap-and-Trade” 9 Posted 5 hours, 20 minutes ago
Lomborg v. Monbiot: liveblogging the Munk debate on climate change 6 Posted 8 hours, 43 minutes ago
The localization of agriculture 1 Posted 5 hours, 14 minutes ago
Green is the new ... blah
CNN—or some overworked and over-it headline writer at CNN—calls it: “Cisco Goes—What Else?—Green.” Seriously, Cisco—that’s so 2008.
Katharine Wroth is a senior editor at Grist.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
Comments
View as Flat
amazingdrx Posted 10:56 pm
29 Jan 2009
Cisco's Chambers signalled the death of the old phone companies before the bushwacking began. It's finally happening, phone traffic is shifting to the internet. Pretty soon a shift to wireless broadband over the power grid might gobble up the cell phone business too?
This limited use of smart grid switching concentrates on internet devices, phones, servers, PCs and so forth, but it's just a few USB grid power relays away from controlling a million water heaters or freezers to smooth out power grid fluctuations due to wind and solar power variations.
It's all too complicated for popular media so far though. When producers say blah, over stories like this, the public won't hear about them. Until every other home has a distributed smart grid device controlling its power use and granting internet access over the power grid.
By that time the second internet boom will have turned bubble, and the smart money will have gone elsewhere. Tech media, oh please blah us and make our money smart, along with the power grid.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Backcut Posted 11:52 pm
29 Jan 2009
Don't get me wrong, as I do think we need an upgrade. The power companies want the government to buy their dilapidated distribution systems from them at the cost of trillions of pretty pennies.
If we're going to have a system, new or old, we need to have a backup plan for the inevitable massive failure.
Scenic pics at http://Lhfotoware.blogspot.com
Permalink
amazingdrx Posted 12:09 am
30 Jan 2009
The current widespread midwestern ice storm power outage is expected to be ended by mid-Feb. Is that particular centralized power grid model reliable?
With a smart grid neighborhood loops could be up and running already, stores and gas stations would have emergency backup power from cogeneration systems. Large buildings with cogeneration and farms with biogas and wind power would power up local grids. Solar panels would kick in to charge emergency backup batteries in homes.
Plugin hybrids would be used in auxillary generator and storage mode to get local grids going.
Meanwhile in central monopoly power grid land, customers wait for weeks while their pipes freeze and businesses go belly up.
Which system is more stable in troubled climatic times like this with ever more severe weather events happening ever more frequently? Is it worth 50 billion per year to get the smart grid going? Yep, even in lost business from storms alone.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin
Permalink
Backcut Posted 12:55 am
30 Jan 2009
Would a surge disable a solar panel? How would the electrical system of a car connected to the gris fare against that surge. The smart grid would hopefully have redundant safety systems to protect everything hooked up to it.
Scenic pics at http://Lhfotoware.blogspot.com
Permalink