Geoengineering, adaptation, and mitigation, part 2

White roofs are the trillion-dollar solution 7

Part 1 introduced urban heat island mitigation (UHIM).  It discussed how lighter colored (or reflective) roofs and pavement, plus urban trees, can save energy, cut CO2 emissions, cool a city, and reduce smog.

But a global “cool roofs” strategy can achieve far bigger benefits—the equivalent of several trillion dollars worth of CO2 reductions—since it can increase the albedo (reflectivity) of the planet, thereby directly reducing the absorption of incoming solar radiation and hence planetary warming.  The strategy proposed below “is equivalent to taking the world’s approximately 600 million cars off the road for 18 years.

cool-roofs.jpg

(100 m2 (~1000 ft2) of a white roof, replacing a dark roof, offsets the emission of 10 tonnes of CO2.)

This is technically geoengineering, although I’d call it geoengineering-light or geo-reverse-engineering, since we are mostly undoing the albedo decrease caused by all the dark roofs and dark pavement we have covered the planet with.

A forthcoming article in Climatic Change, “Global Cooling: Increasing World-wide Urban Albedos to Offset CO2,” [PDF] provides the detailed calculations.  A two-page non-technical summary, “White Roofs Cool the World, Directly Offset CO2 and Delay Global Warming,” [PDF] has been written by two of the country’s leading UHIM experts:  Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Hashem Akbari and California Energy Commissioner Arthur Rosenfeld (coauthors with me on “Paint the Town White—and Green”).  I have reprinted it below:

As the threat of global warming becomes widely recognized, scientists have proposed using geoengineering (manipulation of the Earth’s environment) to quickly respond to this threat. Most proposed geoengineering techniques are novel and unproven. Two simple technologies that have been around for thousands of years, cool roofs and cool pavements, should be the first geoengineering techniques used to combat global warming.


Increasing the solar reflectance of urban surfaces reduces their solar heat gain, lowers their temperatures, and avoids transferring heat back into the atmosphere. This process of “negative radiative forcing” counters global warming. In a recent study to be published in journal Climatic Change [PDF], Akbari, Menon and Rosenfeld have calculated the CO2 offset, or equivalent reduction in CO2 emission, achieved by increasing the solar reflectance of urban surfaces.


Most existing flat roofs are dark and reflect only 10 to 20% of sunlight. Resurfacing the roof with a white material that has a long-term solar reflectance of 0.60 or more increases its solar reflectance by at least 0.40. Akbari et al. estimate that so retrofitting 100 m2 (1000 ft2) of roof offsets 10 tonnes of CO2 emission. (For comparison purposes, we point out that a typical US house emits about 10 tonnes of CO2 per year.) Emitted CO2 is currently traded in Europe at about $25/tonne, making this 10-tonne offset worth $250.


It is fairly easy to persuade (or to require) the owners of buildings to select white materials for flat roofs, and in California this has been required since 2005. However, the demand for white sloped roofs is limited in North America, so California compromises by requiring only “cool colored” surfaces for sloped roofs. (This rule takes effect in July 2009, see “California tightens building standards yet again.”)


Use of cool-colored surfaces increases solar reflectance by about 0.20 and yields a CO2 offset of about five tonnes per 100 m2, or about half that achieved with white surfaces. The solar reflectance of pavement can be raised on average by about 0.15, offsetting about four tonnes of CO2 per 100 m2.


Over 50% of the world population now lives in urban areas, and by 2040 that fraction is expected to reach 70%. Pavements and roofs comprise over 60% of urban surfaces (roofs 20 to 25%, pavements about 40%). Akbari et al. estimate that permanently retrofitting urban roofs and pavements in the tropical and temperate regions of the world with solar-reflective materials would offset 44 billion tonnes of emitted CO2, worth $1.1 trillion at $25/tonne.

(Note that the price of CO2 will almost certainly need to exceed $100/tonne in the 2020s if we are going to catastrophic warming (see here).  So the full benefit of this strategy would likely exceeds $4 trillion.)

How can the reader visualize this one time offset of 44 billion tonnes of CO2? The average world car emits about 4 tonnes of CO2 each year. Permanently increasing the solar reflectance of urban roofs and pavements worldwide would offset 11 billion car-years of emission. This is equivalent to taking the world’s approximately 600 million cars off the road for 18 years.

cool2.jpg

If only roofs are changed from their current dark colors to white for flat roofs and cool colors for sloped roofs, we can offset 24 billion tonnes of CO2. If we take 20 years to implement just the cool roofs portion, it’s the equivalent of taking half of the cars in the world off the road for every year of the 20 year program (see table). The offset provided by cooling urban surfaces affords us a significant delay in climate change during which we can take further measures to improve energy efficiency and sustainability.


Akbari et al. propose an international campaign to use solar reflective materials when roofs and pavements are initially built or resurfaced in temperate and tropical regions. They point out that such an international “cool cities” program is a win, win, win proposition.


Cool roofs reduce cooling-energy use in air conditioned buildings and increase comfort in unconditioned buildings (win #1). Cool roofs and cool pavements mitigate summer urban heat islands, improving outdoor air quality and comfort (win #2). This latest research shows that cool roofs and cool pavements can cool the entire globe (win #3). Installing cool roofs and cool pavements in cities worldwide does not require delicate international negotiations about capping CO2 emission rates.

Part 3 will look at how cool roofs could fit into a green stimulus package.

This post was created for ClimateProgress.org, a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

Joseph Romm is the editor of Climate Progress and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. sindark's avatar

    sindark Posted 6:03 am
    07 Jan 2009

    Atmospheric compositionIt is worth mentioning that using white roofs to reflect light into space does nothing to mitigate ocean acidification.
    That being said, there do seem to be many good reasons to use 'cool roofs.'

    a sibilant intake of breath
  2. Gar Lipow's avatar

    Gar Lipow Posted 6:16 am
    07 Jan 2009

    Net effect may be a bit smaller but only a bitCool roofs add to heating bills unless they home is very well insulated. On the other hand they reduce cooling bills in homes with air conditioning, and we should insulate poor insulated homes in any case. Still probably should be accounted for.
  3. Ken Johnson's avatar

    Ken Johnson Posted 7:38 am
    07 Jan 2009

    Questions"...retrofitting 100 m2 (1000 ft2) of roof offsets 10 tonnes of CO2 emission." Is that 10 tonnes annually or over the life of the building? And is the offset primarily due to albedo-related cooling, or is it mainly from reduced CO2 emissions associated with air conditioning?

  4. stopgreenpath Posted 12:34 pm
    07 Jan 2009

    uh, solar panels will do a whole lot moresorry, but any roof that is "hot" enough to need a "cool roof" should be covered with PV panels.  if they are elevated a bit off the roof surface, they will actually create a shading effect which will cool the roof somewhat, as well as converting a decent amount of the light that hits the panels into electricity rather than heat.  not to mention they will generate masses of clean, green power right where it is used.
    keep in mind that 1.7 MILLION acres of carbon-absorbing SW desert is in the permitting cue - so far - for total and permanent destruction to provide (ahem) "renewable energy."  we can hardly waste millions of square meters of flat, baking rooftops right where power is needed, while this eco-terrorism proceeds in our deserts!
    cool roads, yes.  cool roofs, no.  we have more than an urban heat island crisis in this country - we have an energy crisis.  all these white roofs and roof gardens are missing the potential of PV.  
    sure, we need better policies, like feed in tariffs, to make these projects profitable, so THAT should be the focus of our advocacy, not on re-roofing buildings which then need to pull power (albeit somewhat less power) from a remote wilderness location.

    the greenest energy is that which you needn't ever produce.
  5. Tasermons Partner Posted 12:49 pm
    07 Jan 2009

    Cool can also be green...vegetated, that is......I'm with stopgreenpath on this one.
    White roofs are great if you're lookin' for a very quick and very cheap way to reduce energy costs, but long term, new construction can do much better.
    Solar panels are good, and the ultimate in cool roofs are green/vegetated roofs.  Vegetated roofs can reduce the temperature by 30 degress or more compared to conventional roof types.  Plus, they help insulate better in the winter months.
    Not to mention less water runoff, and the water that is runoff is cleaner.
    And the vegetation helps absorb GHGs and cleans the air, and can provide habitat for insects, birds, and small animals.
    Even some opportunities for urban agriculture, if ya wanna take it that far.
  6. Pangolin's avatar

    Pangolin Posted 6:47 am
    08 Jan 2009

    Lighten up people Your roofs I mean.
    In addition to whitening the roofs or covering them with solar panels roof replacements should be as light in weight as possible in climates where cooling costs exceed heating.
    That thermal mass up above your head absorbs heat all day long and transmits it down into your house. By reducing the mass the cooling load of the building after the sun goes down can be reduced considerably.
    Look at the weight of metal roofs vs tile or even asphalt and the weight reduction alone will add up to reduced cooling costs. A few mm of hot steel roofing is going to shed heat way faster than a few cm of hot ceramic.

    Put the Carbon Back
  7. dobermanmacleod Posted 8:58 pm
    12 Jan 2009

    How about white roads and parking lots too?I thought of starting a company that painted asphalt parking lots and roads white, but the idea is ahead of it's time.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement