Edible Media: Delectable food-politics books of '08, part I

Vandana Shiva’s powerful Soil Not Oil 3

Edible Media takes an occasional look at interesting or deplorable food journalism.

——-

In a recent essay in The Nation, the critic William Deresiewicz made a pungent observation about the U.S. cultural scene:

An iron law of American life decrees that the provinces of thought be limited in the collective consciousness to a single representative. Like a poor man’s Noah, we take one of each. One physicist: Stephen Hawking. One literary theorist: Harold Bloom. One radical social critic: Noam Chomsky. Before her death, we had one intellectual, Susan Sontag, and one only. (Now we’ve dispensed with the category altogether.) We are great anointers in this country, a habit that obviates the need for scrutiny. We don’t want to have to go into the ins and outs of a thing—weigh merits, examine histories, enter debates. We just want to put a face on it—the logic of celebrity culture—and move on.

For food politics, the Anointed One is Michael Pollan. The year opened with publication of Pollan’s In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. Half critical history of "nutritionism" half diet-advice book, Defense outperformed this year’s pack of food-politics books by a wide margin, both in critical and popular terms.

Yet intellectual life, like agriculture, needs biodiversity to thrive. Pollan is a formidable food-politics writer, but others exist, too. A number of worthy food-politics books emerged this year, and over the next week I’ll be posting reviews of the year’s top ten. Today’s is Vandana Shiva’s Soil Not Oil: Environmental Justice in an Age of Climate Crisis.

Soil Not OilIn Deresiewicz’s terms, Shiva is our Global South Environmental Activist. Fierce and uncompromising, she uses her outsider’s perspective to form withering critiques of the Western-led global economic order.

Yet it’s a mistake to box her in as an angry polemicist. Trained as a physicist, Shiva brings a holistic perspective to the debate around food and energy. She’s a kind of vintage scientist—a throwback to the age before the Enlightenment capriciously divided science from moral philosophy.

In our time, a kind of phony war is being waged—a corporate-led, philistine "war on science," countered by an equally corporate-led, reductionist science.

Shiva sweeps aside the wreckage of this false debate and cuts to the heart of the matter. Fittingly, her latest book, Soil Not Oil, is a kind of totalizing manifesto. She plucks the global south’s precarious situation with regard to food from the margin of the conversation and moves it to the center.

By the end of Soil Not Oil, you’ll see the fate of India’s smallholding farmers as a proxy not just for that huge nation’s prospects, but also for humanity’s fate in an era of rapid climate change and fossil-fuel scarcity.

One of my favorite chapters poses the question: "Sacred Cows or Sacred Cars." Shiva writes:

During the enclosure of the commons in Britain, Sir Thomas more wrote, "sheep eat men." He was referring to the diversion of land from providing for human needs and sustenance to providing wool as a raw material for factories and profits for the landlords and factory owners. The peasants were uprooted; a new poverty was created. Land that fed people was now to feed the factories.

From there, she details how fertile Indian land is now being swallowed for highways and car factories—even as climate change accelerates and food insecurity grows.

Here in the West, it is no longer fashionable among environmentalists to critique the car. It’s too ingrained in American culture; by attacking the car, we lose the public and relegate ourselves to the margins. Thus, rather than push mass transit, we dream of technologies (plug-in hybrids, the fantasia of ethanol) that can keep our little private pods motoring down the road.

I’m glad we have Shiva to question our dangerous devotions. This book needs to be read, not just by food fanatics but by environmentalists of all stripes.

Advertisement
Advertisement
  1. Sharon Astyk Posted 2:17 am
    30 Dec 2008

    Shiva Cannot Be EncapsulatedI'm glad to see this post, and this book being drawn to attention.  Shiva actually deserves credit not as our global south agrarian, but as our the closest thing to a world-level public intellectual we've really got.  In this book and really all of her books, she strips down to is fundamentally intellectual vacancy the widely and uncritically accepted notion of the tragedy of the commons, and undermines it as a basis for much public thought.  IMHO, the uncritical acceptance of Hardin has done more to inform a whole host of things about America in the last 20 years, than most ideas have - and Shiva offers (and reoffers, and reoffers until it penetrates) a scathing, articulate and powerful critique of a deeply wrongheaded and fundamentally destructive area of thought.
    Sharon

    Sharon, with dirt under her fingernails.
  2. Bart Anderson's avatar

    Bart Anderson Posted 5:55 am
    30 Dec 2008

    HardinSharon Astyk writes: "the uncritical acceptance of Hardin"
    Hear, hear!  
    What strikes me now is how bad the social science is in the essay. When I discussed the essay with an archaeologist friend, he just rolled his eyes.
    History and anthropology were not Hardin's fields, and he never did much research in them.  This did not stop him from making sweeping generalizations.
    The appeal of Hardin's essay is two-fold.  First, there is a tendency for commons to be degraded as he described. However, there are other social factors that operate in the opposite direction.  And the exact mechanism of degradation depends on the social system.  For example, peasant agriculture is different from globalized capitalism.
    People who want to make generalizations about societies should really get some basic background first.
    The second reason for Hardin's appeal is that it played to the prejudices against the Commons.  
    A recent critique (actually a summary of the critiques):

    The Myth of the Tragedy of the Commons

    Part II

    Bart


    Energy Bulletin
  3. Jon Rynn's avatar

    Jon Rynn Posted 6:34 am
    30 Dec 2008

    Particularly since indigenous peoplesare often good stewards of their ecosystems, as for instance the Menominee of Wisconsin with their forest.  Rainforest Action Network calls for indigenous peoples to be given property rights of rainforest areas as a solution to the problem of deforestation, and there is certainly plenty of data within Paul Hawken's "Blessed Unrest" to support the idea, where appropriate.

Add a Comment

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have an account, log in. If you don't have an account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Hello, Visitor!    Why not register?

Advertisement